[PITTM]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wow, this is fantastic.

I don't know anybody from anywhere, and had no prior e-pinions formed regarding anybody in this debacle.

With that being said, here are the drawn conclusions from an impartial party:

1. Anacardo seems to be a nice enough guy who is probably pretty sensitive, and got caught up with a cyber-chick.

2. They absolutely did the nasty.

3. KittyKat loses interest and disappears.

4. Anacardo gets bummed and tries to fruitlessly contact someone who is ignoring him.

5. Getting obviously ignored is frustrating, and leads to continued attempts at contact.

6. KK plays the "stalker" card to try to make a clean break.

7. KK hooks up with yet another cyber-person, and starts backpedaling.

8. Cyber-guy #2 tries to diffuse, blinded by the chicky, and not wanting to accept that he's the next one up to bat.

Standard.

[/ QUOTE ]


oreopimp's reply:

[ QUOTE ]


nay we are not living together. we hooked up in vegas, I came with her to austin for a while, like 2 weeks or so, and then thats it. After I fly home Im pretty sure thats it. so we are just doing our thing enjoying the time.

but the list looks accurate except #7, needs to be switched. she backpedeled way before i got there, before she even met me outside of online chat. #8 is just gay and false, I dont play lame games with women or allow them to blind me to most things. The only reason I have my viewpoint is after talking with ppl and see how she has been since Ive been around, so eh, what am I supposed to do. Im open to either way though.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm assuming that this means #2 is in fact accurate

[/ QUOTE ]

bakkubakku, investigative reporter. take a bow my friend.

rj