Re: First Post -- Anyone?
[ QUOTE ]
Radar writes:
In order for Mason and Piers to show that Arnold's argument is invalid, they have to show that one of the following items is mathematically wrong:
1. They have to show mathematically that fast play will not more frequently keep you in the green zone in fast tournaments than conservative play.
OR
2. They have to show that Arnold's math is wrong in Chapter 10 of The Poker Tournament Formula, where he shows the mathematical basis of the edge a big chip stack has over a small chip stack in a tournament.
OR
3. They have to show that you are not limited in your skill options when you sink below the green zone.
[/ QUOTE ]
That's a pretty clear stand to take.
So far, the answers have been rather muddled and evasive. It's rather disapointing given that this is a forum dedicated to improving your poker.
Anyone care to step up?
Best,
Zim
|