[ZeroPointMachine]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think a logical conclusion of what you've done is that M isn't always M. An M of 8 on one site doesn't mean the same thing at all as an M of 8 at another site.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't understand. M takes into account your stack, the blinds, antes and number of players at the table. The method of calculation is consistent no matter what site you play on. The only difference is the values that you plug into the formula.

[ QUOTE ]
I think the data you've presented is a good starting point for creating some sort of 'M multiplier' to use at each site. Actually, I think to really get it right you need a different M multiplier for each level at each site, since what you really care about is the structure for the remainder of the tournament at any given time(particularly the next few levels), not the entire tournament.

[/ QUOTE ]
You lost me. Can you give an example?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think what he is getting at is that M does not take into account the accelerating blinds. In some structures/levels your M of 10 is going to become an M of 5 much quicker than others. Therefore your "relative M" may justify more aggressive moves than your actual M.