Re: another super weakly played sklansky hand
I'm sorry, but this thread has generated far too much useless discussion on a very insignificant hand that will just not come up very often in long term play. There is just not much useful strategic material here. Most good players dont include 9-5o in their overall strategy and probably this hand should have just been chopped. Who cares that DS was in the blind. He is a great poker writer and player, but this hand is stupid, and whether or not DS missed a value raise on the end is also stupid. I dont mean to sound patronizing, but I think this happens too often on here lately- too much clutter and effort put into something that isnt important. Am I wrong?
-J
|