Re: The Freakonomics of Tournaments: A Preview (74s UTG at final table
Hey man, I can understand while you are frustrated. I think you hit the nail on the head when you said
"I don't think I'm being taken seriously, because my math and logic isn't perfect."
I think this is a flaw on our part, that stems from Mason on down. It is a very mathy/logic type of place.
I am very interested in discussing your overall style in greater detail. I think there is some very important math behind it, I just dont think anyone is thinking about it in the right way.
Also,
I only made the Doyle Brunson comment, b/c I think your post came across as cocky, and that was part of the reason, the thread turned away from what I thought it should have been about (your style).
|