[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
“How can you ask to see my hand given you didn’t show me yours when you were required to show first?”
[/ QUOTE ]
I believe player A was required to show first or muck.
He mucked (eventually). Dealer should show player B's hand.
If player B gets his hand past the dealer into the muck
he won't have to show his hand.
[/ QUOTE ]
All this happened slow enough so that even a plodding thinker like me could have tossed the hand irretrievably into the muck as the pot was being pushed. But I was genuinely interested in what decision I would get, since when I worked the floor years ago I had to use the catch all "in the interest of fairness" justification when I ruled differently in
this related thread.
~ Rick