[kyleb]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So your definition of "best hitter" is whoever you want up with 2 outs and a runner on second?

Last time I checked, there are more situations than that for determining "best hitter."

[/ QUOTE ]

Did I say that was my definition of best hitter or did I say that's who I'd take in the scenario I replied to?


[/ QUOTE ]

No, but even if you would take the .300 BA guy in that specific situation, what's your point? That in that specific situation you want a guy who hits for less power, gets on base less, and makes contact more often?

Great. So, uh, is there a rush on the market for these kind of guys or what?