[flyingmoose]

[ QUOTE ]
I watched the FT, where this hand occurred. I tallied nath's UTG raises from when it was 8-handed to when it was 5-handed. He played in the UTG position 11 times. He raised 6 times. Two of those times he had a good hand (AK, 88). He was called twice (in other words, he was called 33% of the time). Net outcome: negative 25k chips.

For those who argue that nath had the table running scared, he was called by a 33 and by an A9. Sounds like the table adjusted well to nath's playing style.

Sorry to bring up the facts. I know you defenders of Nath like to go with the "feel of the thing" and ignore the inconvenient facts.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was jogging but I tripped and fell over, scraping my knee in the process. Therefore jogging is bad for my health.