View Single Post
  #20  
Old 06-22-2006, 06:59 PM
DeuceKicker DeuceKicker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Daddy, I\'m hiccing up
Posts: 1,195
Default Re: Floor ruling - who\'s fault is this?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Checking is action and if you don't think that there is harm in allowing a player to bet after three players behind him have checked you don't have a very firm grasp of the game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Three people folding to a bet and a raise is 'significant' action. Three people checking is almost the complete absence of action.

[/ QUOTE ]

There is no difference in the 'amount of action' between a check, bet, or raise. For the person on the fence about whether they should bet (not talking about OP), three checks behind him is very significant information.

In the B&Ms I frequent, 3 people acting behind you is always considered significant action, and you will not be allowed to bet.
Reply With Quote