Re: Floor ruling - who\'s fault is this?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Three checks behind is not significant action.
If there had been a bet and three folds, maybe. But "check" "check" "check"...there's no harm in letting you bet (especially since it's a dealer error).
[/ QUOTE ]
Checking is action and if you don't think that there is harm in allowing a player to bet after three players behind him have checked you don't have a very firm grasp of the game.
[/ QUOTE ]
Three people folding to a bet and a raise is 'significant' action. Three people checking is almost the complete absence of action.
|