Sklansky\'s and Mason\'s theory really flawed?
Very interesting quote. No one wants to comment? Sklansky, Mason, others? I liked both of those books' SH sections. My only complain is that they should have been longer and more thorough. Of course, HEPFAP was much more detailed of those.
Mason commented a little while ago Maroon's book - said it had a lot of flaws. I suppose Maroon didn't like it, but is HEPFAP really that flawed? Hard to believe, but at least he gives some examples of those claimed flaws. Discuss. I bet Maroon will show up if Mason or Sklansky comments, maybe otherwise too. Then we could ask him to specify more flaws. And Matros too.
Those two quite known poker authors just questioned the theory behind 2+2 limit books and teachings of the two main authors, so I don't think it should be passed with silence.
|