[Matt R.]

[ QUOTE ]
Get a grasp of basic physics, then you can start telling me which of my opinions you find hilarious.

[/ QUOTE ]

What physics courses have you taken again? Oh, right...

[ QUOTE ]
BZZZZZZZZZT!

PV = nRT, ideal gas law. Temperature is proportional to both pressure and volume, so you can increase pressure and decrease volume and temperature is constant. If the gas were at higher temperature, then the temperature would equilibriate with the container. Second Law Of Thermodynamics, you remember him, he came up earlier.


[/ QUOTE ]

Now you're just being retarded. Of course when I'm comparing a canister under high pressure vs. one under low pressure I'm assuming equal volumes. Otherwise my statement is useless. You do know that when you put a gas under high pressure, its temperature increases right?

I really don't understand the points you are trying to make with the rest of your post -- they just don't make any sense in context of the question. First, you are denying that the molecules have a net motion AWAY from each other. Uhh, what? They're in the bottle/canister, and when they are released, they move away from each other. Thus they have a net movement AWAY from each other. Is this difficult or something?

[ QUOTE ]
What is responsible for the increased force is increased frequency of collision between the gas molecules and the container, due to increased gas density. The molecules are not travelling faster. As I said, having higher temperature matter next to lower temperature matter for extended periods is forbidden by the second law

[/ QUOTE ]

I have no idea what point you are trying to make with this. You say there is an increased force (which is electromagnetic), and yet you somehow conclude that it is not responsible at all for the diffusion of the molecules. I never said the molecules were traveling faster either -- just that their net direction is different (it is zero when they are crammed inside the bottle or canister).

And yes, I still find you hilarious.