Only the first two citations were examples of her lying. Her footnotes show that she lied.
************************************************** ********
I have note seen her footnotes or the articles in question.
Nor has anyone on this forum posted these. Therefore I see no proof. I do see proof of anti-Coulter bias where opinions are called lies and minor errors are called lies.
http://www.townhall.com/opinion/colu...09/168702.html
E.g."I claim Evan Thomas' father was the Socialist Party presidential candidate Norman Thomas."
It was his GRANDfather not his father yet thousands of websites cite this as proof of her lies. Ann has since corrected this mistake. Labeling these minor glitches as lies shows the desperate tactics that Ann's detractors are willing to sink to.
They also show that she doesn't consider herself a satirist, but rather a political commentator.
************************************************** *
Being satirist and a political commentator are not mutually exclusive.