[Big_Jim]

[ QUOTE ]
I don't see why I should have to explain the information I set forth clearly in my previous post to someone who has been using the forum long enough to make 5732 posts, but if it's possible to explain anything to you Jim I'll try my best.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't see why I should have to explain incredibly basic fundamentals to you, but I've tried my best, and apparently failed.

[ QUOTE ]
The poll may not be valuable in the field of strict scientific research, (I know since this was my field pre-poker) however it holds more weight than just one individual's opinion, can you understand why?

[/ QUOTE ]
Why do you feel the need to talk down to me like I'm an idiot? Your poll DIDN'T EVEN INCLUDE the option that I feel is by far most likely. Not also that NOBODY except for you is advocating a flop fold. Do you really think that you are this far ahead of the curve?

[ QUOTE ]
So you have position on someone who raised you on the flop. Does a non-bet on the turn now represent strength or weakness? Answers on a postcard please.

[/ QUOTE ]
I have not played against this opponent, so I don't know, but I'll figure it out quicker than you will, with your strategy.

[ QUOTE ]
If his calling your flop reraise 'for sure doesn't mean a weaker king' you have a clear course of action, one that merely calling doesn't give.

[/ QUOTE ]
A clear course of action may make things simpler, but it's not necessarily (and typically is NOT) the play that makes the most money.

[ QUOTE ]
However, if he doesn't call with a weaker king then why would he call an all-in with K9 as you suggest?

[/ QUOTE ]
My suggestion was for on the turn, when he is far more pot committed.

[ QUOTE ]
As far as the 'inept' comment I was referring to someone who can only fire one barrel of a bluff, not the poster who I was quoting.

[/ QUOTE ]
Fair enough, but this is CLEARLY an argument for calling on the flop.