Re: Paradox or no?
Nash_clown, I stand corrected. Thank you for your input.
I was mislead from a standpoint of an observer of action in our game. Let's say first opponent raises. Since as observer I know his range, I know that second player's distribution has now changed. This is true and obvious. If tight UTG raises, there are bound to be less Aces in hands of opponents. From here I made my conclusion. But when second player does actually get involved, distributions in both players' hands are equal.
-pix
|