[BPA234]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm going to concur with Felicia and back Matt on this one. I'm a long-time lurker on 2+2 and a long-time reader of Matt's blog. It's not like Matt spends his day trolling 2+2 and ripping on people with ridiculous, made-up accusations. He really only ever mentions 2+2 on his blog when:

1)someone is playing the "recommended" 2+2 stats for short-handed holdem and Matt is talking about how to exploit that style

or

2)Someone here decides to rip on him and he thinks it would be funny to get a rise out of them. For instance, read all of this post.

And let's be honest - Matt may be guilty of a blunt style, but a lot of his criticism of 2+2 is both true and worth considering, espeically his objection to the way consensus tends to form here and dissenting opinions are mocked.

Just my $.02

matt

[/ QUOTE ]

Correct.