Re: Study: Did a 757 hit the Pentagon?
[ QUOTE ]
people who were more scared of the boxcutters than dying in a plane crash
[/ QUOTE ] Gee, you think maybe the people in the first three planes didn't know the hijackers intended to fly the planes into buildings? It seems like once the passengers knew what was up, they did try to save themselves (Oops! I forgot. That plane was shot down on your planet).
[ QUOTE ]
16-foot pre-collapse hole was caused by a 757
[/ QUOTE ] Seems to be conflicting information about that 16-foot hole. The 16 foot number seems only to be cited on wacko sites. Also, I'm not enough of an engineer to know exactly how big a hole a 757 flying into reinforced concrete would make. A 757 is has a lot of empty space. i don't find it at all unbelievable that it wouldld crush and fragment on impact. Not as unbelievable as the idea that our own military took it out with a missile, to be sure.
[ QUOTE ]
Larry Silverstein, the owner of the WTC, was lying when he said on video that "we pulled the building,"
[/ QUOTE ] So the guy you're accusing of insurance fraud a few sentences later is a credible source of information? BTW, I'm not sure what "pulled the building" means. Nor do I know what context he said that in, if in fact he said it.
[ QUOTE ]
fire on two floors could cause a 47 story building to collapse
[/ QUOTE ]
According to the "official" version, that fire involved several thousand gallons of diesel fuel, and the building was already severely damaged by falling debris from the towers. I find that more believable than mega-conspiracies.
[ QUOTE ]
Larry Silverstein took out a $2.2 billion insurance claim on the entire WTC complex just weeks before 9/11. He made $500 million off building 7 alone!
[/ QUOTE ] So he filed a claim before it happened? Oh, I get it, you don't know the difference between an insurance claim and an insurance policy. Gee, he insured his buildings. Guilty! Nobody insures their property unless they're planning to destroy it. I think if I owned those buildings, I might insure them too, and if they collapsed, I'd probably file a claim. He "made" 500 million? Wow that claims adjuster ought to be fired. Or did you not figure tha value of the loss in that equation? I bet not.
[ QUOTE ]
Also, the government had offices for the IRS, the EEOC, the US Secret Service, the SEC, and the CIA - all in building 7.
Sweet! Larry gets new buildings and the government agencies get new offices!
[/ QUOTE ]
Oh! It all makes sense now. The government hatched the whole 9/11 conspiracy so some government agencies could get new offices! How could I not see that? I guess they just knocked down the two main towers and fired a missile into the Pentagon as a diversion.
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I already showed you some evidence for building 7.
[/ QUOTE ]
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ha! OMG! You actually think that's evidence? That's even funnier than a donk capping the river when his 95 offsuit catches a counterfeited second pair with 4 to an open-ended straight flush on the board.
Hint: When I say "evidence" I mean something physical evidence supporting explosive demolition, or credible witnesses who say they participated in the conspiracy (preferably more than one), you know, something a little stronger than uneducated speculation on whether a huge fire could or could not have caused a building to collapse, and inuendo based on the fact that the owner of the building (shock!) insured that building. Do I think the government may be withholding some information about 9/11? Yes. Do I think they are doing that to cover up some insane conspiracy to create a fake terrorist attack? No way in hell. Not without some real eveidence to back it up. I put this stuff on the same level as the fake moon landing or chemtrails, and a step down form most of the JFK assassination conspiracy theories.
|