[stud7champ]

lets think outside of the box the two plus two books are basically the best in terms of theory particularly theory based on mathematics. The weakness of the two plus two books in the past was not enough examples and large gaps in the psychology of play, the more practical aspects. Put it another way. Let a mathematician who's interested in poker get All the two plus two books on HE then study it for a year and play for the next 5 years then put him against Greenstein of Phil. Who will you bet your house on?
OK Phil or Greenstein, its not just the books there's other factors out there that make a great player. Hopefully Barry addresses some of that.
Finally its not in poker players best interest to recommend the Greenstein book if it is a great book. why get your competitor to read up on your new learning's