[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
My response commented on the poster's logic, not his opinion. But speaking of opinions, contrary to the hippy pc logic you seem to espouse, not everyone's opinion is equally valid, esp if it is based on flawed logic.
[/ QUOTE ]
Flawed logic?
Like conflating someone's actual statements (e.g., about software) with a different concept (e.g., books)? Or assuming from statements someone made that they were actually proposing an argument and then proceeding to attack the argument you imagined into existence using logical fallacies that you try to pass off as sound logic...
[/ QUOTE ]
The argument I was addressing was that an advantage that one person has that others may not have access to is unfair. I argue (though sarcasm) this is logically flawed and stupid. Saying that I was conflating books and software is itself a strawman (see link above) -- the poster's logic had already done that.