[Surf]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

let's seperate it into hands likely to 3bet and hands likely to call:
AK - 15 combo's
AQ - 15 combo's
AJ - 12 combo's

A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] - 1 combo
A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] - 1 combo
AA - 12 combo's
KK - 12 combo's
QQ - 12 combo's
JJ - 6 combo's
TT - 6 combo's
This range is a little better, but some hands can be discredited, as I'm not sure villian leads here with AK-AJ with high frequency. Irregardless, it now shows 3bet range of 50 > 42 combo's. This is my main argument to call here.

[/ QUOTE ]
JJ and TT are 3 combos each. 99 is a likely hand, at least as likely as AJo.

[/ QUOTE ]

Indeed. KQ? KQs? ATs? Can we expect an unknown to raise these?

Surf