Re: how can this NOT be collusion?
[ QUOTE ]
This definitely looks like cheating to me (collusion or one guy on two accounts). It really makes me curious what hand A held if the hand that had to showdown was J high. I would think the extra $1200 would be worth it even if A had just ace high. I hope the site responds.
[/ QUOTE ]
well because B had been playing pretty normally, i wouldn't be surprised if A made a really big laydown. his play just strikes me as weird. he caps preflop. he bet-calls the flop. the turn is a deuce and he bet-3bets. the river is a blank and he bet-folds. the only hand that makes any sense to me is TT trying to induce a raise on the turn from a worse hand. but then why would he 3-bet?
maybe i'm underestimating how bad B is? i have him cold capping Q7s from the BB one hand so he's laggier than i thought. here is another though this conceivably makes sense
Hand #30428937-13235 at Owen Sound ($300/$600 Hold'em)
Powered by UltimateBet
Started at 02/Apr/06 04:16:58
A is at seat 2 with $23320.50.
B is at seat 3 with $41283.
C is at seat 4 with $35120.50.
The button is at seat 2.
B posts the small blind of $150.
C posts the big blind of $300.
A: -- --
B: -- --
C: -- --
Pre-flop:
A raises to $600. B calls. C
re-raises to $900. A calls. B calls.
Flop (board: Ah 8h 6h):
B checks. C bets $300. A
calls. B raises to $600. C re-raises
to $900. A calls. B calls.
Turn (board: Ah 8h 6h 6c):
B checks. C bets $600. A
raises to $1200. B re-raises to $1800.
C folds. A calls.
River (board: Ah 8h 6h 6c As):
B bets $600. A folds. B is
returned $600 (uncalled).
Hand #30428937-13235 Summary:
$1 is raked from a pot of $9600.
B wins $9599.
----------------------------------------------------------------
|