Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

I never post here, but there it is, my first post...

WTF is that?? Could it be collusion?? I realy don't understand. He would get a penality at the WSOP for that!


Full Tilt Poker Game #2910630924: Table Brookview (6 max) - $200/$400 - Pot Limit Omaha Hi - 22:14:44 ET - 2007/07/10

Seat 1: DaFool ($108,891.50)
Seat 2: bacina ($12,746)
Seat 3: John Juanda ($11,896)
Seat 4: Shahin83 ($69,371)
Seat 5: Sydney Dean ($7,600)
Seat 6: David Benyamine ($33,152)

Sydney Dean posts the small blind of $200
David Benyamine posts the big blind of $400
The button is in seat #4

DaFool folds
bacina folds
John Juanda folds
Shahin83 raises to $1,400
Sydney Dean folds
David Benyamine calls $1,000

*** FLOP *** [Kh 5s As]

David Benyamine checks
Shahin83 bets $2,400
David Benyamine calls $2,400
*** TURN *** [Kh 5s As] [4d]
David Benyamine checks
Shahin83 checks
*** RIVER *** [Kh 5s As 4d] [Qc]
David Benyamine bets $6,800
Shahin83 raises to $17,500
David Benyamine calls $10,700 <<---Ultimate nuts !!??!!

*** SHOW DOWN ***
Shahin83 shows [Ah 6c Ts Th] a pair of Aces
David Benyamine shows [Kd Tc 5d Jc] a straight, Ace high
David Benyamine wins the pot ($42,797) with a straight, Ace high
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot $42,800 | Rake $3
Board: [Kh 5s As 4d Qc]
Seat 1: DaFool didn't bet (folded)
Seat 2: bacina didn't bet (folded)
Seat 3: John Juanda didn't bet (folded)
Seat 4: Shahin83 (button) showed [Ah 6c Ts Th] and lost with a pair of Aces
Seat 5: Sydney Dean (small blind) folded before the Flop
Seat 6: David Benyamine (big blind) showed [Kd Tc 5d Jc] and won ($42,797) with a straight, Ace high
[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

or you know, a misclick.

Re: Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

benyamine is just a mongoloid

Re: Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

or maybe a simple misclick or misread

Re: Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

He clearly knew Shahin83 must have the nuts as well and didn't want to unnecessarily increase the rake.

Re: Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

"unnecessarily increase the rake. "

3 rd lvl at least

Re: Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

he knew shahin was bluffing but wanted to know what he had

Re: Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

[ QUOTE ]
he knew shahin was bluffing but wanted to know what he had

[/ QUOTE ]

cmon, your losing credibility.

Re: Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
he knew shahin was bluffing but wanted to know what he had

[/ QUOTE ]

cmon, your losing credibility.

[/ QUOTE ]
its really not that far off. It is very possible david did this to see his cards. If he raises, hes only going to get called by the same hand so what is the point, why not get some info

Re: Possible collusion on tilt with Benyamine ?
 

It's very common not to put in the third raise with broadway nuts in omaha.