Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

With Phil's record setting # of cashes and now bracelets does this cement him as the World's best No Limit player?

Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

...no.

You have to be a winning cash player too in order to even wince at that title.

Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

[ QUOTE ]
...no.

You have to be a winning cash player too in order to even wince at that title.

[/ QUOTE ]

No Limit is not even the favorite game of the cash gamers today.

Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

[ QUOTE ]
...no.

You have to be a winning cash player too in order to even wince at that title.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sooooo, hellmuth isnt a winning cash player? Hes not good enough?
He might be good enough to beat 1/2, maybe 2/4 and possibly 3/6 if he runs good. But then again....he might not be good enough he just wins tournaments. or are you trying to say he has to beat the highest stakes possible to be a winning cash player?

Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

[ QUOTE ]
With Phil's record setting # of cashes and now bracelets does this cement him as the World's best No Limit player?

[/ QUOTE ]

this is a gimmick account right????? lolololol

Phil is probably one of the top 3 NL tourney players against a weak field that is typified by the WSOP. Look at his results in top fields like the WPT championship, or any event with a top heavy field.

As a NL cash player Phil is a player that pros love to have at their tables, a tourney donk who thinks he can play the same way in a cash games as a tournament.

Cant believe I even wasted time to write this.

Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
With Phil's record setting # of cashes and now bracelets does this cement him as the World's best No Limit player?

[/ QUOTE ]

this is a gimmick account right????? lolololol

Phil is probably one of the top 3 NL tourney players against a weak field that is typified by the WSOP. Look at his results in top fields like the WPT championship, or any event with a top heavy field.

As a NL cash player Phil is a player that pros love to have at their tables, a tourney donk who thinks he can play the same way in a cash games as a tournament.

Cant believe I even wasted time to write this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just about every big name poker pro was in this event....isn't that good enough??

Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
...no.

You have to be a winning cash player too in order to even wince at that title.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sooooo, hellmuth isnt a winning cash player? Hes not good enough?
He might be good enough to beat 1/2, maybe 2/4 and possibly 3/6 if he runs good. But then again....he might not be good enough he just wins tournaments. or are you trying to say he has to beat the highest stakes possible to be a winning cash player?

[/ QUOTE ]

To be considered the best; I think you need to beat the highest stakes....or is that not right?

Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

lol am i getting leveled?

1. pro:amateur ratio
2. yes, no limit is more popular than limit now
3. you have an argument if you say he's the best no limit hold'em tournament player.

Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

Phil has done extremely well the last two years at the WPT Championship at Bellagio. Also, I'm pretty sure a few good players play in these WSOP events, but I can't be certain.

Re: Hellmuth\'s Place?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Look at his results in top fields like the WPT championship, or any event with a top heavy field.

[/ QUOTE ]

like the tournament of champions or the national heads-up championship????