NLCASH - limit vs rake
 

I have no idea how to check this out.
What do you think - on which level the rake is not that big part of the pots (so winrate also) so you can play it more profitable.
Somewhere I red that playing for ex. on NL50 is very hard because of that, you need to have higher winrate just to beat the rake.
What about higher levels?

,
Thanks

PS. Sorry for my english, it's not my native language [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: NLCASH - limit vs rake
 

I would say that you have to play at the very least $5 - 10 limit online. Even at these stakes the rake is very significant. Getting a rakeback deal is essential IMO.

Re: NLCASH - limit vs rake
 

I mean limit as level, the question is about HUNL cashgames [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Re: NLCASH - limit vs rake
 

It's commonly accepted that bellow NL$200 the rake is too high and you should stick to HU SNGs.

Unless you can find a megadonk in which case rake doesn't matter [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]