Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   STT Strategy (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   ($55s): 44 UTG, shorthanded (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=160370)

DevinLake 07-12-2006 09:12 PM

($55s): 44 UTG, shorthanded
 
Revisiting some simple situations. Anyone raising this? No one is especially loose.

PartyPoker $55 Speed Tournament, Big Blind is t100 (5 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com

Hero (t6140)
CO (t3795)
Button (t1898)
SB (t6247)
BB (t1920)

Preflop: Hero is in UTG with 4[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
Hero ????

lastchance 07-12-2006 09:21 PM

Re: ($55s): 44 UTG, shorthanded
 
I think this is a fold (maybe a limp). Who wants to play a big pot with 44 OOP?

FoldYourLife 07-12-2006 10:31 PM

Re: ($55s): 44 UTG, shorthanded
 
5-handed w/ your stack I like a standard raise to 275 or so.

TruFloridaGator 07-12-2006 10:53 PM

Re: ($55s): 44 UTG, shorthanded
 
I think raising and folding are both ok options.

Pudge714 07-12-2006 11:55 PM

Re: ($55s): 44 UTG, shorthanded
 
I raise to 250-300

player1 07-13-2006 12:59 PM

Re: ($55s): 44 UTG, shorthanded
 
typically, i would fold this in this position. however, if i haven't raised in a while, i'll put in a raise to 300.

Josh_sieg 07-13-2006 01:02 PM

Re: ($55s): 44 UTG, shorthanded
 
You're so deep, isn't a limp ok?

Also, then you could reraise if the button tries to get fresh.

DevinLake 07-13-2006 01:46 PM

Re: ($55s): 44 UTG, shorthanded
 
[ QUOTE ]
You're so deep, isn't a limp ok?


[/ QUOTE ]

Well, I'm deep but two out of my four opponents are not. So, the implied odds are not good.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:15 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.