A *good* NL luckometer?
 

Is there software that can gauge how lucky you are getting as far as all ins won lost, hit draws etc? I would pay good money for one and I imagine so would a lot of other people.

Re: A *good* NL luckometer?
 

Why?

Re: A *good* NL luckometer?
 

Why not?

Re: A *good* NL luckometer?
 

i've heard of one, can't remember the name though.

Re: A *good* NL luckometer?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Why?

[/ QUOTE ]

It would be a very valuable tool for people who suck at poker but just don't realize it yet.

Re: A *good* NL luckometer?
 

evtester.com

Re: A *good* NL luckometer?
 

[ QUOTE ]


It would be a very valuable tool for people who suck at poker but just don't realize it yet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then I'm fine with it if I don't have to use it.

Re: A *good* NL luckometer?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Is there software that can gauge how lucky you are getting as far as all ins won lost, hit draws etc? I would pay good money for one and I imagine so would a lot of other people.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've been thinking of this as an upgrade to PT for some time now. There's some very very good stats on PT, but no real 'fun' stats section to have a poke at. Sure, anyone who knows a little about databases can query this sort of stuff on their own, but given that pros can bandy around 'I've run bad for the last 300,000 hands' etc, having some sort of luck related measure would be good.

Kind of like a tilt-o-meter, bubble-meter. Could even have extra little icons to represent recent luck episodes.

Clearly over time the variance between the players luck factor decreases, but in the short term (and short term means something different to me than it does to Ivey), neato.

Re: A *good* NL luckometer?
 

pokergrader did something like this didn't it?

Re: A *good* NL luckometer?
 

[ QUOTE ]
pokergrader did something like this didn't it?

[/ QUOTE ]
IIRC it was discussed and they came to conclusion that it sucked. I can remember wrong though..