Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   STT Strategy (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   How much value lost by not having PAHUD? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=157253)

Cap_Of_Water 07-09-2006 01:04 AM

How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
I got a new computer, got my PT working and PAHUD, but then something corrupted a file and i had to get everything wiped and start over. i havent reloaded either programs yet because im thinking PT caused the corrupt file because i wasnt compacting the databases, but it could have been something else too... Now my question is, to people that use PAHUD, did it add ALOT to your game/results or is it just nice for certain situations?

sanmarcosrun1 07-09-2006 01:07 AM

Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
IMO anything that can make even the slightest +EV change in play is well worth it.

Jimmy James 07-09-2006 05:25 AM

Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
didnt add a ton to my game, but nice to know who folds to continuation bets, and who calls most of them. its also nice when u are 4+ tabling and u are able to see who the maniacs are right away.

madbeetz 07-09-2006 05:31 AM

Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
[ QUOTE ]
IMO anything that can make even the slightest +EV change in play is well worth it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree completely, but I am not sure what stats I should display, and how exactly they are to e deciphered(although I guess the more I use it, the more familiar I will become... Any pointers would be nice

AMT 07-09-2006 06:57 AM

Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
i believe its an advantage to have but not a necessity if you are an experienced multi tabler. i find it to be a good tool but some players dont like to use it at all.

AliasMrJones 07-09-2006 12:04 PM

Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
If you multi-table, it is certainly worth more than it costs.

Tickner 07-09-2006 12:12 PM

Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
[ QUOTE ]
IMO anything that can make even the slightest +EV change in play is well worth it.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the stats are used properly and you do in fact make a +EV change in play, and you do not mis-use the stats to make even greater -EV plays, then it is fine. Only get it if you know how to interpret relavent stats and use them properly.

By relavent stats I mean stats that have any significance. If you only have 50 hands on a player, his stats are useless. If you have 2000 hands on another player but 95% of them are from level 1, dont count on his stats on the bubble.

-Tickner

TravestyFund 07-09-2006 12:17 PM

Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
I dont use it, might start, prob not.

AliasMrJones 07-09-2006 12:19 PM

Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
[ QUOTE ]
If you only have 50 hands on a player, his stats are useless.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is untrue. I can usually get a decent minimal read on everyone at the table in about an orbitt and have a reasonable profile by 50 hands. Is it 100% accurate? No. Is it good enough to inform many decisions? Absolutely.

fallen 07-09-2006 01:39 PM

Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If you only have 50 hands on a player, his stats are useless.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is untrue. I can usually get a decent minimal read on everyone at the table in about an orbitt and have a reasonable profile by 50 hands. Is it 100% accurate? No. Is it good enough to inform many decisions? Absolutely.

[/ QUOTE ]
I would agree with this. You can usually get a good idea of how they play after an orbit or 2. I think it's just important not to base everything on the stats with such a small sample size. But PAHUD has definetly been +EV for me even with the generally small amount of data you get on opponents at the lower levels.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.