![]() |
How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
I got a new computer, got my PT working and PAHUD, but then something corrupted a file and i had to get everything wiped and start over. i havent reloaded either programs yet because im thinking PT caused the corrupt file because i wasnt compacting the databases, but it could have been something else too... Now my question is, to people that use PAHUD, did it add ALOT to your game/results or is it just nice for certain situations?
|
Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
IMO anything that can make even the slightest +EV change in play is well worth it.
|
Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
didnt add a ton to my game, but nice to know who folds to continuation bets, and who calls most of them. its also nice when u are 4+ tabling and u are able to see who the maniacs are right away.
|
Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
[ QUOTE ]
IMO anything that can make even the slightest +EV change in play is well worth it. [/ QUOTE ] I agree completely, but I am not sure what stats I should display, and how exactly they are to e deciphered(although I guess the more I use it, the more familiar I will become... Any pointers would be nice |
Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
i believe its an advantage to have but not a necessity if you are an experienced multi tabler. i find it to be a good tool but some players dont like to use it at all.
|
Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
If you multi-table, it is certainly worth more than it costs.
|
Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
[ QUOTE ]
IMO anything that can make even the slightest +EV change in play is well worth it. [/ QUOTE ] If the stats are used properly and you do in fact make a +EV change in play, and you do not mis-use the stats to make even greater -EV plays, then it is fine. Only get it if you know how to interpret relavent stats and use them properly. By relavent stats I mean stats that have any significance. If you only have 50 hands on a player, his stats are useless. If you have 2000 hands on another player but 95% of them are from level 1, dont count on his stats on the bubble. -Tickner |
Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
I dont use it, might start, prob not.
|
Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
[ QUOTE ]
If you only have 50 hands on a player, his stats are useless. [/ QUOTE ] This is untrue. I can usually get a decent minimal read on everyone at the table in about an orbitt and have a reasonable profile by 50 hands. Is it 100% accurate? No. Is it good enough to inform many decisions? Absolutely. |
Re: How much value lost by not having PAHUD?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you only have 50 hands on a player, his stats are useless. [/ QUOTE ] This is untrue. I can usually get a decent minimal read on everyone at the table in about an orbitt and have a reasonable profile by 50 hands. Is it 100% accurate? No. Is it good enough to inform many decisions? Absolutely. [/ QUOTE ] I would agree with this. You can usually get a good idea of how they play after an orbit or 2. I think it's just important not to base everything on the stats with such a small sample size. But PAHUD has definetly been +EV for me even with the generally small amount of data you get on opponents at the lower levels. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:30 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.