never bluff a fish?
 

CO villain in this hand is a true to life honest to god manna from heaven loose passive unthinking fish.

SB is most likely not sophisticated enough to check and induce a bluff with a pair on that river.

Absolute Poker
Limit Holdem Ring game
Limit: $1/$2
6 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (6 players) Guruman is BB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
2 folds, CO calls, Button folds, SB calls, Guruman checks.

Flop: A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3SB, 3 players)
SB checks, Guruman checks, CO checks.

Turn: J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (1.5BB, 3 players)
SB checks, Guruman checks, CO checks.

River: 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (1.5BB, 3 players)
SB checks, <font color="#cc0000">Guruman bets</font>

my thoughts here - if this hand checks through I lose it for sure. If I bet it though, there are tons of better hands that look like they're begging to fold. I'd check this with a K or Q, but having cards so low seems to swing this one to a bluff for me.

Crazy or KrazyKool?

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

Crazy.

1.5 BB

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

[ QUOTE ]
(1.5BB, 3 players)

[/ QUOTE ]

But hey, depending on your opponents it just may work often enough to be profitable. Considering you will be looked up by any PP, a fresh 7, or sometimes K or Q high, seems unlikely.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Crazy.

1.5 BB

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. You need to fold both these guys 67% of the time, meaning each needs to fold on average sqrt(0.67) = a whopping 82% of the time to break even. Even if their fold % was above this you couldn't really make more than a fraction of a BB. In addition, these sort of flops aren't really conducive to people folding.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

fair enough, and I agree with the rationale. So, how big of a pot do you need to start bluffing with?

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

1 opponent too many. 1 street too late.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

[ QUOTE ]
fair enough, and I agree with the rationale. So, how big of a pot do you need to start bluffing with?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, it's sort of a catch-22 situation IMO, since if the pot were bigger there would have been some previous action that usually greatly increases the chance that someone's planning on going to showdown.

I guess as an academic exercise, if some pro-gambling philanthropist were to be walking by and threw some cash in the pot right when the river card was flipped, I'd be willing to try this bet with about 4.5BB in the pot. That means they each need to fold a little under half the time; I think the average player would probably fold a little more than this, but with the read on CO I need a little bit bigger pot.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

[ QUOTE ]
You need to fold both these guys 67% of the time, meaning each needs to fold on average sqrt(0.67) = a whopping 82% of the time to break even.

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean 40% of the time, right? Each needs to fold 63.25% of the time.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

Not on that board. Not on that street. Not with that hand. Not against a calling station.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You need to fold both these guys 67% of the time, meaning each needs to fold on average sqrt(0.67) = a whopping 82% of the time to break even.

[/ QUOTE ]

You mean 40% of the time, right? Each needs to fold 63.25% of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]
yeah this is right

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

grunch
are two players folding this often enough to make it worth it? Risking 1 bb to win 1.5 in this situation seems crazy to me.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

Good lord. You win this pot, then so what? It's TINY. Check through and go on to the next hand.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

[ QUOTE ]
CO villain in this hand is a true to life honest to god manna from heaven loose passive unthinking fish.

SB is most likely not sophisticated enough to check and induce a bluff with a pair on that river.

[/ QUOTE ]


So they'll call with K-hi, Q-hi and god knows what else.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

[ QUOTE ]
You win this pot, then so what? It's TINY.

[/ QUOTE ]
With the winnings, you would only be able to get one item from the dollar menu.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

The last time I tried this the pot was HU and I got called by Q high. There's no way I'm trying to win a 3 handed pot with nothing in it.

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

edit: nm, figured it out

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

Not in a pot this small. your risking 1 BB to win 1.5...you have to win 66% of the time. My guess is this is working 20%, espically against 2 players .

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

Betting here is insanity; it's a tiny, nothing crap-ass pot. Check thru, next hand please...


Tom

Re: never bluff a fish?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I guess as an academic exercise, if some pro-gambling philanthropist were to be walking by and threw some cash in the pot right when the river card was flipped,

[/ QUOTE ]

awsome