Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Science, Math, and Philosophy (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=49)
-   -   If you could only save one . . . (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=55249)

maurile 03-07-2006 08:47 PM

If you could only save one . . .
 
If a fire breaks out in a fertility clinic, whom do you save — a Petri dish with five blastula or the two year-old child?

madnak 03-07-2006 08:53 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
Already done in politics. And wow, was that a mess.

Er, not to put a damper on things. Maybe it will be more interesting here.

I save the kid because, er, blastulas are kind of hard to anthropomorphize.

BCPVP 03-07-2006 09:07 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
Both. And yes, I know I'm ignoring the restrictions of the OP. We did this recently (I thought it was here, but it might have been in Politics).

Pilket 03-07-2006 09:21 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
How many blastula can the two year-old child be expected to co-produce during their lifetime? More than 5 I'd gather, especially if he/she went out of their way to do it.

I chose the child, obviously.

BCPVP 03-07-2006 09:50 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
How many blastula can the two year-old child be expected to co-produce during their lifetime? More than 5 I'd gather, especially if he/she went out of their way to do it.

I chose the child, obviously.

[/ QUOTE ]
How many 2 year old children can the blastula be expected to co-produce during their lifetime?

Rduke55 03-07-2006 10:00 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
If for no other reason (althought there are a ton) I can go with the toddler for suffering reasons. No nervous system = no pain.

MelchyBeau 03-07-2006 10:02 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
whats the chances of the blastula actually becoming children. Remember they don't always become children due to the artificial fertilization methods correct?

Melch

straightflush 03-07-2006 10:23 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
What is the two year old doing alone in a fertility clinic?

AceofSpades 03-07-2006 11:32 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
If for no other reason (althought there are a ton) I can go with the toddler for suffering reasons. No nervous system = no pain.

[/ QUOTE ]

bisonbison 03-08-2006 02:33 AM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
I like this question.

It's petty in a really satisfying way.

yukoncpa 03-08-2006 03:10 AM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
Fertility clinics routinely throw approximately 1000 blastula a day in the trash. The only people who care about blastula are George Bush and far right conservatives. Oh yes, and people who can use them for life saving stem cell research.

hmkpoker 03-08-2006 03:53 AM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
Both. And yes, I know I'm ignoring the restrictions of the OP. We did this recently (I thought it was here, but it might have been in Politics).

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it was in politics

Now let's never speak of this again.

BCPVP 03-08-2006 04:15 AM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Both. And yes, I know I'm ignoring the restrictions of the OP. We did this recently (I thought it was here, but it might have been in Politics).

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it was in politics

Now let's never speak of this again.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ah, yes. Just read through it again and I'm still pleased with my answers.

And that [censored] who thought I was only 15 kinda welched out on that wager....

Pauwl 03-08-2006 04:29 AM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
BCPVP,
I believe that you are about 20 or 21 correct?
Just curious.

BCPVP 03-08-2006 04:54 AM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
BCPVP,
I believe that you are about 20 or 21 correct?
Just curious.

[/ QUOTE ]
Correct. I'll be 21 in August.

chezlaw 03-08-2006 04:57 AM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
2 year old first
then
a pet
then
my coat
then a cup of tea

chez

Fabian 03-08-2006 07:14 AM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Both. And yes, I know I'm ignoring the restrictions of the OP. We did this recently (I thought it was here, but it might have been in Politics).

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, it was in politics

Now let's never speak of this again.

[/ QUOTE ]
Ah, yes. Just read through it again and I'm still pleased with my answers.

And that [censored] who thought I was only 15 kinda welched out on that wager....

[/ QUOTE ]

You really shouldn't be. In general, avoiding answering questions by making (in general, very irrelevant) analogies or asking counter questions is not a good way to argue. Even if you're right (which, in general, people who employ this argumentative style are not) your credibility basically disappears right there and no one will take you seriously when you're not discussing rationally.

Hope this helps.

Trantor 03-08-2006 05:45 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
If for no other reason (althought there are a ton) I can go with the toddler for suffering reasons. No nervous system = no pain.

[/ QUOTE ]
That is one way of saying what you chose to leave behind is a "no brainer"!

Prevaricator 03-08-2006 05:52 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
I think a better question is, could the progress of science cause A to be the unequivocably better option in the future?

The Don 03-08-2006 05:58 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
This was the most insightful response in the last thread.

BCPVP 03-08-2006 08:41 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
In general, avoiding answering questions by making (in general, very irrelevant) analogies or asking counter questions is not a good way to argue.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wow, analogies and counter questions have no place in debate? I've never heard that before. I didn't avoid answering the questions, I avoided giving them the answer they wanted. Nice job trying to mischaracterize what I said, though.

madnak 03-08-2006 09:39 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 

Fabian 03-08-2006 09:51 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
madnak,

[img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Fabian

HLMencken 03-08-2006 11:05 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
This was the most insightful response in the last thread.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. And of course, that is the response which gets zero follow-on replies.

Good answer, pvn.

hmkpoker 03-08-2006 11:45 PM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
madnak, I thought we agreed to stop pointing out the fact that BCPVP is a....no, I won't say it.

maurile 03-10-2006 03:25 AM

Re: If you could only save one . . .
 
[ QUOTE ]
2 year old first
then
a pet
then
my coat
then a cup of tea

[/ QUOTE ]
That's not a very good Haiku, but I appreciate the effort.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.