Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Omaha High (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   100 PLO: Get chips in fast??? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=540233)

ChuckyB 11-07-2007 02:51 AM

100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
.50/1 PLO. I've run my short stack up to $50.

This is the first time I remember CO raising in an hour-plus so I have to believe he has a strong hand.
SB recently got destroyed so he could have anything (seems like the player who has to have high cards here. Not the type to push a run-down hand.)
UTG+1 seems good.

This would be the first time I've ever shoved/willingly been all-in with this type of hand.

1) Do I want to be all-in pre-flop? My instinct says 'yes'. What if I had no suits?
2) Should I re-pot it myself? Or let the guy I believe to be very strong do it?
3) What if there's a smart player who may also be in with a run-down hand?


UTG+1: dianey33 ($146.70 in chips)
MP1: Jimmy Chagra ($54.60 in chips)
MP2: ChuckyB_DT ($50.70 in chips)
MP3: pokeresq ($58.35 in chips)
CO: Piiop ($85.50 in chips)
BUTTON: OAK-SILV&bla ($92.15 in chips)
SB: Mojo7559 ($15 in chips)
BB: 2'sRwild ($284.65 in chips)
UTG: kindwarrior ($125.90 in chips)

*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to HERO [8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]]
2 calls, fold, HERO calls, fold, <font color="red">CO raises to $4</font>, fold, <font color="red">SB raises to $15 (all-in)</font>, fold, fold, UTG+1 calls $14, HERO ???

Rob121 11-07-2007 03:45 AM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
wow. no do not repot, you do not want to get it in now with 8high.
fold&gt;call&gt;raise

wazz 11-07-2007 04:35 AM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
Rob's pretty much on the money here. If you were double-suited I'd call, but as it stands you've no reason to continue given that people like to get all-in preflop with hands like yours (which includes a few hands that crush yours).

wire 11-07-2007 04:43 AM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
Don't cold call. Fold, in fact. You're not even double suited. Don't get between these 2 preflop raising donkballs.

RoundTower 11-07-2007 07:58 AM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
i'd call.

thisnamedoesntfi 11-07-2007 08:18 AM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
If he calls, what does he do once CO shoves? I'd call here, but would be worried about CO when I do.

iggymcfly 11-07-2007 09:08 AM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
[ QUOTE ]
i'd call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Me too. I kinda like to call though, just in general. I think it's pretty neutral EV between calling and folding.

Calling's definitely better than shoving though since your hand plays better multi-way than it does HU and a reraise could push CO out. Also, your hand is one that's pretty well defined by a flop whereas something like a big pair hand will often have no idea where they stand if the flop comes low so seeing a flop with close to a PSB left benefits your hand much more than others.

CrushinFelt 11-07-2007 09:15 AM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
Call and call any raise. I'd have said repot but you're not deep enough and you put CO on a strong hand.

Rob121 11-07-2007 01:02 PM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
[ QUOTE ]
If he calls, what does he do once CO shoves? I'd call here, but would be worried about CO when I do.

[/ QUOTE ]

obviously call.

for those who say call, could you explain your reasoning a little?

SuperSnort 11-07-2007 01:49 PM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
dont shortstack plo

ChuckyB 11-07-2007 02:24 PM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
So I ran some equity calculations (thanks to 'wazz' who posted a link to Pro Poker Tools in another thread)

8 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]7 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]6 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]5 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] had 29% equity against what ended up being the three other hands in the main pot. In the side pot it had 35.7% equity against the two other hands. Plus I gain protection if one of the two remaining hands makes the other fold (up to 40-45%).

Based on some other calculations, the only way I've found that I'm pooched is if someone has bigger diamonds and someone has a higher four-card run-down. Then I'd have, in some cases, just under 20% equity.

When I was there I saw this as a situation that Rolf Slotboom talks about...how well an 8765 (in his examples, double-suited) does against a strong high-card hand. That said, I wasn't sure if I'd have the balls to go for it.

ChuckyB 11-07-2007 02:27 PM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
[ QUOTE ]
dont shortstack plo

[/ QUOTE ]

Moral objection or I'm missing value?

Shortstacking has allowed me into the game and learn quite a bit with much less risk. I don't have nearly enough $$ online to play more than .10/.25 with a full buy-in.

Rob121 11-07-2007 03:49 PM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
you should move down and learn to play full stacked it will be worth it in the long run if thats what you care about.

ChuckyB 11-07-2007 04:29 PM

Re: 100 PLO: Get chips in fast???
 
[ QUOTE ]
you should move down and learn to play full stacked it will be worth it in the long run if thats what you care about.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I have no illusion that I'm learning much about playing after the flop. I'm just trying to get into the action because, for whatever reason, I can't take NLHE.

That said, there are some valuable lessons I've picked up from short-stacking and watching (putting people on hands, value of marginal hands based on prior action, etc.)

And shorties are much less stressful for multi-tabling.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.