Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=533073)

13_Xerxes 10-28-2007 10:23 AM

[NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
BB is 19/17/8, looks very aggro, probably from 2+2.
CO is a TAG.
I am a TAG, almost nit (19/16).

Of course, when I 4 bets this small (to induce shove), I am snap calling a push.

Standard ?

No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (6 handed) Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Hero ($549.50)
MP ($238.80)
CO ($425)
Button ($64)
SB ($651)
BB ($457.80)

Preflop: Hero is UTG with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img].
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $12</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls $12, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $56</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $140</font>, CO folds, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $457.8</font>

Teh1337zor 10-28-2007 10:28 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
yeah pretty much

futuredoc85 10-28-2007 10:33 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
yes

mustmuck 10-28-2007 10:44 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
Your four bet isn't small. You're going to either 4 bet to around this size or shove. Hand looks super standard, particularly if BB is a known light squeezer.

luvetoholdem 10-28-2007 10:56 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
These plays I hate.

I guarantee your behind here.
How often are you going to be ahead? I would say almost never.


What hands would he push that we beat?

I guarantee you he has KK, AA here.

KeanuReaver 10-28-2007 10:59 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
it's fine
if you 4bet light ever this is my preferred line
obviously calling too

Some9 10-28-2007 11:02 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
I don't like the idea of inducing a shove, rather 4bet more to discourage a shove.

Currently I am experimenting with just right out 4bet shoving in those spots. My range for those shoves would be AK and half of QQ-KK.

Teh1337zor 10-28-2007 11:03 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
These plays I hate.

I guarantee your behind here.
How often are you going to be ahead? I would say almost never.


What hands would he push that we beat?

I guarantee you he has KK, AA here.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post12701917

luvetoholdem 10-28-2007 11:04 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
These plays I hate.

I guarantee your behind here.
How often are you going to be ahead? I would say almost never.


What hands would he push that we beat?

I guarantee you he has KK, AA here.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post12701917

[/ QUOTE ]


What does that have to do with this?

Teh1337zor 10-28-2007 11:08 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
not much other than your sn is automatically attached to that thread in my mind

Suwalski 10-28-2007 11:28 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
Good. Putting him on KK+ here is wrong.

luvetoholdem 10-28-2007 11:40 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
Good. Putting him on KK+ here is wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

I doubt it.

BlackAMEX 10-28-2007 11:43 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
No way, this is sooo standard.

luvetoholdem 10-28-2007 11:47 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
OP,

Can you please give us Villans hand.

I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA.

futuredoc85 10-28-2007 11:48 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Good. Putting him on KK+ here is wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

I doubt it.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...part=1&amp;vc=1

Teh1337zor 10-28-2007 11:51 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Good. Putting him on KK+ here is wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

I doubt it.

[/ QUOTE ]

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...part=1&amp;vc=1

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

PartysOver 10-28-2007 05:11 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
OP,

Can you please give us Villans hand.

I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol you're a moron

edit: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...part=1&amp;vc=1

oyvindgee 10-28-2007 05:15 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
OP,

Can you please give us Villans hand.

I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA.

[/ QUOTE ]

Had this been .5/1 I would agree. At 2/4 your comment is really stupid. And since this was posted, chances of OP losing the hand increased by 1000%.

luvetoholdem 10-28-2007 05:15 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
So OP, can you show these fools I am right?

Kwantum 10-28-2007 05:16 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
Very standard.

oyvindgee 10-28-2007 05:19 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right?

[/ QUOTE ]

And incidentally, against a range consisting of QQ+, calling is hardly -EV at all. Add AK which is most def in 95% of villains ranges and it's a no brainer call.

Darkfolder 10-28-2007 05:22 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right?

[/ QUOTE ]
Can you please stop being retarded?

13_Xerxes 10-28-2007 06:00 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
OP,

Can you please give us Villans hand.

I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA.

[/ QUOTE ]

I call quickly, he had JJ, and of course, I am a deep [censored] in coin flip...

ty for answers

captainwacky 10-28-2007 06:01 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right?

[/ QUOTE ]

no one ever posts hands where the dude shows up with QQ and then wins the flip. so you know this is a checkup. But just because there's a good chance that this particular hand ended with villain having KK+ doesn't mean that the play isn't fine.

edit: too late and wrong... but right at the same time

Teh1337zor 10-28-2007 06:03 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
LOLOL

LucidDream 10-28-2007 06:44 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
OP,

Can you please give us Villans hand.

I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is wrong but his range should be very polarized here.

oyvindgee 10-28-2007 06:50 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
OP,

Can you please give us Villans hand.

I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA.

[/ QUOTE ]

this is wrong but his range should be very polarized here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Either I don't understand what polarized means or I disagree.

WizardAce 10-28-2007 07:06 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
the pot is offering 2:1. around 600 in the pot we have to call 310
if we put the player on JJ+;AK we have 40-60 % equity
if he has KK,AK. 37-63 %.
but i he makes this play with QQ+, you have only 30-70%
against KK+ its 18-82 % desaster
i gave him the QQ+ (maybe KK+) so there is no call here.
we need 33% for a call ....

driller 10-28-2007 07:08 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
Why is shoving here wrong?

oyvindgee 10-28-2007 07:16 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
the pot is offering 2:1. around 600 in the pot we have to call 310
if we put the player on JJ+;AK we have 40-60 % equity
if he has KK,AK. 37-63 %.
but i he makes this play with QQ+, you have only 30-70%
against KK+ its 18-82 % desaster
i gave him the QQ+ (maybe KK+) so there is no call here.
we need 33% for a call ....

[/ QUOTE ]

Against QQ+ we have 31% equity which makes it a slightly bad call. Since that range is ridic tight and should only be used to make my point we have way more equity than that. It's a no brainer call. Stop being retards.

tecate 10-29-2007 02:38 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
4 betting is fine, but just calling and making some plays post flop will put opp in a tougher spot imo.

Butcho22 10-29-2007 03:59 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
the pot is offering 2:1. around 600 in the pot we have to call 310
if we put the player on JJ+;AK we have 40-60 % equity
if he has KK,AK. 37-63 %.
but i he makes this play with QQ+, you have only 30-70%
against KK+ its 18-82 % desaster
i gave him the QQ+ (maybe KK+) so there is no call here.
we need 33% for a call ....

[/ QUOTE ]

Against QQ+ we have 31% equity which makes it a slightly bad call. Since that range is ridic tight and should only be used to make my point we have way more equity than that. It's a no brainer call. Stop being retards.

[/ QUOTE ]

not my fight but keep in mind...

[ QUOTE ]
I am a TAG, almost nit (19/16).


[/ QUOTE ]

RAHZero 10-29-2007 04:03 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
ROFMAO at this thread, this is sooo standard. Definitely do not fold after you 4-bet. If this had been button steal vs. resteal I might call occasionally in position, but with a player in the middle you have to 4-bet/call a shove.

WizardAce 10-29-2007 04:20 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
exactly he is tight:
AK - AA: 7-93 % equity
AK - KK: 30-70
AK - QQ: 43-57
AK - JJ: 43-57
43% is not a coin flip.
dont like that play against a tight opponent its a loser.

Mat 10-29-2007 07:51 AM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right?

[/ QUOTE ]

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/po...oard=microplnl

futuredoc85 10-29-2007 01:23 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right?

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
he had JJ,

[/ QUOTE ]

lol

rand 10-29-2007 01:34 PM

Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
 
his range isnt polarized bc sometimes he turns AJ into a bluff as well as 56

either way this is super standard...wtf at 12 open uTG though?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.