![]() |
[NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
BB is 19/17/8, looks very aggro, probably from 2+2.
CO is a TAG. I am a TAG, almost nit (19/16). Of course, when I 4 bets this small (to induce shove), I am snap calling a push. Standard ? No-Limit Hold'em, $4 BB (6 handed) Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums) Hero ($549.50) MP ($238.80) CO ($425) Button ($64) SB ($651) BB ($457.80) Preflop: Hero is UTG with A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $12</font>, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls $12, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $56</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $140</font>, CO folds, <font color="#CC3333">BB raises to $457.8</font> |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
yeah pretty much
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
yes
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
Your four bet isn't small. You're going to either 4 bet to around this size or shove. Hand looks super standard, particularly if BB is a known light squeezer.
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
These plays I hate.
I guarantee your behind here. How often are you going to be ahead? I would say almost never. What hands would he push that we beat? I guarantee you he has KK, AA here. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
it's fine
if you 4bet light ever this is my preferred line obviously calling too |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
I don't like the idea of inducing a shove, rather 4bet more to discourage a shove.
Currently I am experimenting with just right out 4bet shoving in those spots. My range for those shoves would be AK and half of QQ-KK. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
These plays I hate. I guarantee your behind here. How often are you going to be ahead? I would say almost never. What hands would he push that we beat? I guarantee you he has KK, AA here. [/ QUOTE ] http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post12701917 |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] These plays I hate. I guarantee your behind here. How often are you going to be ahead? I would say almost never. What hands would he push that we beat? I guarantee you he has KK, AA here. [/ QUOTE ] http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...ue#Post12701917 [/ QUOTE ] What does that have to do with this? |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
not much other than your sn is automatically attached to that thread in my mind
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
Good. Putting him on KK+ here is wrong.
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
Good. Putting him on KK+ here is wrong. [/ QUOTE ] I doubt it. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
No way, this is sooo standard.
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
OP,
Can you please give us Villans hand. I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Good. Putting him on KK+ here is wrong. [/ QUOTE ] I doubt it. [/ QUOTE ] http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...part=1&vc=1 |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Good. Putting him on KK+ here is wrong. [/ QUOTE ] I doubt it. [/ QUOTE ] http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...part=1&vc=1 [/ QUOTE ] lol |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
OP, Can you please give us Villans hand. I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA. [/ QUOTE ] lol you're a moron edit: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...part=1&vc=1 |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
OP, Can you please give us Villans hand. I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA. [/ QUOTE ] Had this been .5/1 I would agree. At 2/4 your comment is really stupid. And since this was posted, chances of OP losing the hand increased by 1000%. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
So OP, can you show these fools I am right?
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
Very standard.
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] And incidentally, against a range consisting of QQ+, calling is hardly -EV at all. Add AK which is most def in 95% of villains ranges and it's a no brainer call. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] Can you please stop being retarded? |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
OP, Can you please give us Villans hand. I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA. [/ QUOTE ] I call quickly, he had JJ, and of course, I am a deep [censored] in coin flip... ty for answers |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] no one ever posts hands where the dude shows up with QQ and then wins the flip. so you know this is a checkup. But just because there's a good chance that this particular hand ended with villain having KK+ doesn't mean that the play isn't fine. edit: too late and wrong... but right at the same time |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
LOLOL
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
OP, Can you please give us Villans hand. I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA. [/ QUOTE ] this is wrong but his range should be very polarized here. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] OP, Can you please give us Villans hand. I will bet any one of these people he has QQ,KK,AA. [/ QUOTE ] this is wrong but his range should be very polarized here. [/ QUOTE ] Either I don't understand what polarized means or I disagree. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
the pot is offering 2:1. around 600 in the pot we have to call 310
if we put the player on JJ+;AK we have 40-60 % equity if he has KK,AK. 37-63 %. but i he makes this play with QQ+, you have only 30-70% against KK+ its 18-82 % desaster i gave him the QQ+ (maybe KK+) so there is no call here. we need 33% for a call .... |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
Why is shoving here wrong?
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
the pot is offering 2:1. around 600 in the pot we have to call 310 if we put the player on JJ+;AK we have 40-60 % equity if he has KK,AK. 37-63 %. but i he makes this play with QQ+, you have only 30-70% against KK+ its 18-82 % desaster i gave him the QQ+ (maybe KK+) so there is no call here. we need 33% for a call .... [/ QUOTE ] Against QQ+ we have 31% equity which makes it a slightly bad call. Since that range is ridic tight and should only be used to make my point we have way more equity than that. It's a no brainer call. Stop being retards. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
4 betting is fine, but just calling and making some plays post flop will put opp in a tougher spot imo.
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] the pot is offering 2:1. around 600 in the pot we have to call 310 if we put the player on JJ+;AK we have 40-60 % equity if he has KK,AK. 37-63 %. but i he makes this play with QQ+, you have only 30-70% against KK+ its 18-82 % desaster i gave him the QQ+ (maybe KK+) so there is no call here. we need 33% for a call .... [/ QUOTE ] Against QQ+ we have 31% equity which makes it a slightly bad call. Since that range is ridic tight and should only be used to make my point we have way more equity than that. It's a no brainer call. Stop being retards. [/ QUOTE ] not my fight but keep in mind... [ QUOTE ] I am a TAG, almost nit (19/16). [/ QUOTE ] |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
ROFMAO at this thread, this is sooo standard. Definitely do not fold after you 4-bet. If this had been button steal vs. resteal I might call occasionally in position, but with a player in the middle you have to 4-bet/call a shove.
|
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
exactly he is tight:
AK - AA: 7-93 % equity AK - KK: 30-70 AK - QQ: 43-57 AK - JJ: 43-57 43% is not a coin flip. dont like that play against a tight opponent its a loser. |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/po...oard=microplnl |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
[ QUOTE ]
So OP, can you show these fools I am right? [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] he had JJ, [/ QUOTE ] lol |
Re: [NL400] AK vs squeeze, std ?
his range isnt polarized bc sometimes he turns AJ into a bluff as well as 56
either way this is super standard...wtf at 12 open uTG though? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.