Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

Fgators in SSNL:

[ QUOTE ]

I'm going out and getting a lawyer and investigating PokerStars. I have about 200 pages of Word documents with tournament and cash game hands where I improbably lost the hand as a monster favorite. This cannot be "bad luck". They will be under investigation and hopefully I can take those scumbags down and gain some retribution from all the money they've stolen from me for running their rigged and cheating operation.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

i want to vote for more than one

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

Ground floor

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

the link doesn't come up with his post for me

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

Monster favorite = 60:40

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

As much as I love to chooes BASTARD!, I think CHOO CHOO is the correct option here.

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

This thread does have potential

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=Prn_WVYC7vs


IM BOUT TO CALL BOVICE. WE BOUT TO RUN THE TRAIN ON YOU

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

ground floor...ship it

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
This thread does have potential

[/ QUOTE ]

i think gators has earned the honor of some photoshops

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[X] I'm going out and getting a lawyer and investigating PokerStars. I have about 200 pages of Word documents.

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
Fgators is unable to find a lawyer who accepts FPPs

[/ QUOTE ]

A+, first poll in ages I haven't instabastarded

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

I voted CHOO CHOO because I probably put some of those beats on Gators.

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

CHOO CHOO and its not close

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

Wasn't it already shown that he doctored/changed the HHs in the word document to make it look like they were beats?

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
Wasn't it already shown that he doctored/changed the HHs in the word document to make it look like they were beats?

[/ QUOTE ]

would be pretty awesome and standard if that did happen.

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

wait, i still dont get how stars gets more money if this happens, wouldn't they get the same amount of rake if he wins or loses any given pot or did poker change in the last 12 hours?

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fgators is unable to find a lawyer who accepts FPPs

[/ QUOTE ]

A+, first poll in ages I haven't instabastarded

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

I'm down with FGators, he and myself are the only known 80+ buy in downswing 2p2ers, ship it.

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wasn't it already shown that he doctored/changed the HHs in the word document to make it look like they were beats?

[/ QUOTE ]

would be pretty awesome and standard if that did happen.

[/ QUOTE ]

you can't say this w/o linking said thread

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm down with FGators, he and myself are the only known 80+ buy in downswing 2p2ers, ship it.

[/ QUOTE ]
thank you for your continued support

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

this is hilarious.

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

BEAT: FGators actually has a bit of truth in his statement
I've looked at tens of thousands of allin confrontations and found something very, very strange; The best hand does not hold up near as often as it should. It's statistically significant and pretty damning. There is absolutely no way things are on the up and up from the data set I have examined.

BRAG: The opponents suck enough on the whole that it's still +ev for me.

VARIANCE: Found the same phenomenoma with a decent size sample from OnGame.



METHOD: Used a SQL query to pull out allin confrontations where both sets of hole cards were known. Calculated the odds/ pot equity based on the known hole cards and board. Became evident that the best hand was doing quite poorly on a few summary stats and ocular examination. Then, ran monte carlos to see how poorly the favored hand does in reality compared to thousands of random trials. It was UGLY!


It's rigged, but I don't think I want to bring out everything as it is my source of income.

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

awesome

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
BEAT: FGators actually has a bit of truth in his statement
I've looked at tens of thousands of allin confrontations and found something very, very strange; The best hand does not hold up near as often as it should. It's statistically significant and pretty damning. There is absolutely no way things are on the up and up from the data set I have examined.

BRAG: The opponents suck enough on the whole that it's still +ev for me.

VARIANCE: Found the same phenomenoma with a decent size sample from OnGame.



METHOD: Used a SQL query to pull out allin confrontations where both sets of hole cards were known. Calculated the odds/ pot equity based on the known hole cards and board. Became evident that the best hand was doing quite poorly on a few summary stats and ocular examination. Then, ran monte carlos to see how poorly the favored hand does in reality compared to thousands of random trials. It was UGLY!


It's rigged, but I don't think I want to bring out everything as it is my source of income.

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BEAT: FGators actually has a bit of truth in his statement
I've looked at tens of thousands of allin confrontations and found something very, very strange; The best hand does not hold up near as often as it should. It's statistically significant and pretty damning. There is absolutely no way things are on the up and up from the data set I have examined.

BRAG: The opponents suck enough on the whole that it's still +ev for me.

VARIANCE: Found the same phenomenoma with a decent size sample from OnGame.



METHOD: Used a SQL query to pull out allin confrontations where both sets of hole cards were known. Calculated the odds/ pot equity based on the known hole cards and board. Became evident that the best hand was doing quite poorly on a few summary stats and ocular examination. Then, ran monte carlos to see how poorly the favored hand does in reality compared to thousands of random trials. It was UGLY!


It's rigged, but I don't think I want to bring out everything as it is my source of income.

[/ QUOTE ]

WTF

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, it's true...Stars is rigged

LDO

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

Can someone with a reasonable datamine of him run PokerEV and post graphs.

Please.

EDIT: nevermind, stars doesn't showdown hands when AI.

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm down with FGators, he and myself are the only known 80+ buy in downswing 2p2ers, we're truly terrible.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm down with FGators, he and myself are the only known 80+ buy in downswing 2p2ers, we're the reason gambler2k4 still thinks he's good.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

FMP

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm down with FGators, he and myself are the only known 80+ buy in downswing 2p2ers, we're a disgrace to humanity.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

FMP

[/ QUOTE ]

FMP again

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

oh yeah, I also voted FGators sucks cuz I've played with him and that was my player note

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

http://diy.despair.com/output/poster81286834.jpg

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
BEAT: FGators actually has a bit of truth in his statement
I've looked at tens of thousands of allin confrontations and found something very, very strange; The best hand does not hold up near as often as it should. It's statistically significant and pretty damning. There is absolutely no way things are on the up and up from the data set I have examined.

BRAG: The opponents suck enough on the whole that it's still +ev for me.

VARIANCE: Found the same phenomenoma with a decent size sample from OnGame.



METHOD: Used a SQL query to pull out allin confrontations where both sets of hole cards were known. Calculated the odds/ pot equity based on the known hole cards and board. Became evident that the best hand was doing quite poorly on a few summary stats and ocular examination. Then, ran monte carlos to see how poorly the favored hand does in reality compared to thousands of random trials. It was UGLY!


It's rigged, but I don't think I want to bring out everything as it is my source of income.

[/ QUOTE ]
wait what

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

lol maybe fgators should try c-betting the flop more than 50% of the time.

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
BEAT: FGators actually has a bit of truth in his statement
I've looked at tens of thousands of allin confrontations and found something very, very strange; The best hand does not hold up near as often as it should. It's statistically significant and pretty damning. There is absolutely no way things are on the up and up from the data set I have examined.

BRAG: The opponents suck enough on the whole that it's still +ev for me.

VARIANCE: Found the same phenomenoma with a decent size sample from OnGame.



METHOD: Used a SQL query to pull out allin confrontations where both sets of hole cards were known. Calculated the odds/ pot equity based on the known hole cards and board. Became evident that the best hand was doing quite poorly on a few summary stats and ocular examination. Then, ran monte carlos to see how poorly the favored hand does in reality compared to thousands of random trials. It was UGLY!


It's rigged, but I don't think I want to bring out everything as it is my source of income.

[/ QUOTE ]

sklansky bux graph plz

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

Why doesn't the link work?

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

Can we take FT to court too? lol

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

Who is this BowtoYourSensei clown?
I take it he runs as well if not better than Sponger?

Re: Breaking development: Pokerstars to be sued for cheating
 

[ QUOTE ]
Who is this BowtoYourSensei clown?
I take it he [censored] my mother?

[/ QUOTE ]

QFT