![]() |
The Most Dangerous player
Poker bluffers are the most dangerous player you will face. they will continue to keep you guessing, whether or not they are bluffing. If you have to guess, you will lose.the bluffer is a master at the art of deception, his play is an illusion. his play will make you believe that which is not true. does he have a strong hand or is he bluffing ? bluffers are very dangerous. bluffers sit and watch every move,gesture,sound you make. during the first rounds, they made your style of play loose,tight,aggressive,etc. they now can predict what hands you are playing, and you are guessing. the most dangerous trait of a bluffer is his psychological effect. the bluffer knows the moment when the mind is most willing to accept a fact. he mastered the science dealing with the mind, to influence or confuse thinking. as I have said before, there is no strategy,theory, starting hand chart that will help you in poker.
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
Did you have a poker theory question or something? Still not sure what the point of any of your threads are. Are we all supposed to stop studying and buy cowboy hats or what?
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
[ QUOTE ]
as I have said before, there is no strategy,theory, starting hand chart that will help you in poker. [/ QUOTE ] Sounds like bluffing is a pretty good strategy [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] Or am I just missing your poetic technique of contradicting yourself at the end of your piece? |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
[ QUOTE ]
Poker bluffers are the most dangerous player you will face. they will continue to keep you guessing, whether or not they are bluffing. If you have to guess, you will lose.the bluffer is a master at the art of deception, his play is an illusion. his play will make you believe that which is not true. does he have a strong hand or is he bluffing ? bluffers are very dangerous. bluffers sit and watch every move,gesture,sound you make. during the first rounds, they made your style of play loose,tight,aggressive,etc. they now can predict what hands you are playing, and you are guessing. the most dangerous trait of a bluffer is his psychological effect. the bluffer knows the moment when the mind is most willing to accept a fact. he mastered the science dealing with the mind, to influence or confuse thinking. as I have said before, there is no strategy,theory, starting hand chart that will help you in poker. [/ QUOTE ] 1. Most of the top players in the world have a very good grasp on poker strategy. 2. Someone who bluffs constantly is very easy to beat. You just widen your calling range accordingly. 3. This is why you lose at online poker. 4. Don't forget my extra Arby Sauce next time you see me in the line. |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
Maybe your symantics are a little off, but I agree.
If I can force you to make the big decisions, to guess, and I've taken the guess-work out of the equation for myself, I'm at a huge advantage, and the cards I'm holding don't even matter. Say you call me down this time; well, I'm just setting you up for later on, and i'll get my money back plus interest when you decide to play back at me when I have the nuts. I'll just wait you out. The worst thing you can be against tough opponents is predictable. They will eat you alive. |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
OP, Why do you post in this forum if you know everything better than anyone else?
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
1. Bluffing is a part of being deceptive. It's not deceptiveness itself.
2. Against a bluffer, position is the key. Marginal hands goes up since you know you'll get paid. 3. You can't bluff someone again if the one you're trying to put all-in after you bluff raise. 4. Am I the only one laughing my ass off? |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
bluffers are serious business
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
[ QUOTE ]
4. Don't forget my extra Arby Sauce next time you see me in the line. [/ QUOTE ] |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
[ QUOTE ]
4. Am I the only one laughing my ass off? [/ QUOTE ] no. |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
You never count your money,
when your sittin' at the table, thell be time enough for countin' when the dealins done. |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
Did you lose your stack to a bluffer?
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
With the exception of Continuation bets, you can beat low stakes poker without bluffing.
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
apocalypse, what do you mean?
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
[ QUOTE ]
Did you have a poker theory question or something? Still not sure what the point of any of your threads are. Are we all supposed to stop studying and buy cowboy hats or what? [/ QUOTE ] rofls!1 |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
If you're playing on the internets, how can you bluff? YOU CANT EVEN SEE THE OTHER GUYS FACE.
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
[ QUOTE ]
apocalypse, what do you mean? [/ QUOTE ] At low stakes, too many players will go all-in with just top pair. You can't bluff players who don't know they are supposed to fold. I'm not saying bluffing never works at low stakes, but you can beat low stakes without bluffing. |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
[ QUOTE ]
Did you lose your stack to a bluffer? [/ QUOTE ] nah, he probably applied lots of theory incorrectly and blames his failure on "holes in the theory" as opposed to his lack of comprehension. |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
[ QUOTE ]
If you're playing on the internets, how can you bluff? YOU CANT EVEN SEE THE OTHER GUYS FACE. [/ QUOTE ] On pokerstars, i can see stinger88's face. He's following in Phil Ivey's footsteps as one of the greatest african american players ever. |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
You should put all your thoughts together and write a really bad book on poker.
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
I hope that OP burns in a grease fire. He can then explain why most people die, but how smart he was because he only got burnt.
|
Re: The Most Dangerous player
Stop smoking the wacky-weed if you are not going to share.
This is your only warning. |
Re: The Most Dangerous player
Full Tilt Poker Game #2828645685: Table Inverter (6 max) - $0.05/$0.10 - No Limit Hold'em - 2:52:13 ET - 2007/07/02
Seat 1: napakatanga ($10) Seat 2: LO SCOULO ($6.75) Seat 3: Andrew Thiele ($10.05) Seat 4: Beesnuts303 ($10) Seat 5: RyP14 ($36.45) Seat 6: eozzy ($1.30) Andrew Thiele posts the small blind of $0.05 Beesnuts303 posts the big blind of $0.10 The button is in seat #2 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Andrew Thiele [8h 9h] RyP14 calls $0.10 eozzy folds napakatanga calls $0.10 LO SCOULO calls $0.10 Andrew Thiele calls $0.05 Beesnuts303 checks *** FLOP *** [5h Jh 3h] Andrew Thiele checks Beesnuts303 checks RyP14 checks napakatanga bets $0.40 <u>LO SCOULO calls $0.40</u> Andrew Thiele calls $0.40 Beesnuts303 folds RyP14 folds *** TURN *** [5h Jh 3h] [Th] Andrew Thiele checks napakatanga checks <u>LO SCOULO bets $0.10</u> Andrew Thiele calls $0.10 napakatanga folds *** RIVER *** [5h Jh 3h Th] [7h] Andrew Thiele has 15 seconds left to act Andrew Thiele bets $1.90 <u>LO SCOULO raises to $3.80</u> Andrew Thiele raises to $9.45, and is all in <u>LO SCOULO calls $2.35, and is all in</u> Seat 2: LO SCOULO (button) mucked [4s As] - a flush, Jack high Seat 3: Andrew Thiele (small blind) showed [8h 9h] and won ($12.80) with a straight flush, Jack high <u>LO SCOULO is sitting out</u> |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.