Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes Limit (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=19)
-   -   8c 6c on the button (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=432649)

Hair_of_the_Dog 06-21-2007 02:29 PM

8c 6c on the button
 
Average LP game
No exceptional reads

Hero on the Button with 8 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 6 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
UTG folds
UTG+1 folds
UTG+2 calls
MP1 folds
MP2 folds
LP1 calls
LP2 calls
Hero calls
SB calls
BB checks

Flop (6sb) [ J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 9 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ]:
SB checks
BB bets
UTG+2 folds
LP1 calls
LP2 calls
Hero raises
SB folds
BB calls
LP1 calls
LP2 calls

Turn (7bb) [ Q [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ]
BB checks
LP1 checks
LP2 checks
Hero ?

BigBadBabar 06-21-2007 02:32 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
checks obv

James. 06-21-2007 02:38 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
check and it's not close.

Harv72b 06-21-2007 02:42 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
I'm guessing your question revolves more around pot equity than folding equity or the like (of which you have zero). Assuming that you are holding the best flush draw, a bet here would have neutral equity if all 3 opponents call again. Yes, you picked up a gutshot, but it's to the ass end and I wouldn't even factor that into the equation; make the Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] a 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] and then we have a value bet.

All that said, I think this is a pretty textbook example of when to take your free card. It's not hardly certain that nobody else has a higher flush draw, while not likely it is possible that someone's getting ready for a check/raise, and as I said, you are never going to get all 3 opponents to fold by firing two more barrels. So you don't have enough pot equity to bet your draw, and you don't have enough folding equity to semibluff...check it through.

gobbledygeek 06-21-2007 03:23 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
* grunch *

I take the free card here every time. Nice job on raising the flop for it as well as for equity but on the turn you've got absolutely nothing and it's unlikely you're going to fold 3 other players.

TheCount212 06-21-2007 05:21 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
surrender

atnels 06-21-2007 07:38 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
I think this is why someone once told me that having position on your opponents was good.

Check.

StrictlyStrategy 06-22-2007 06:39 AM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 

Check > fold> > bet

Lanzalot 06-22-2007 11:06 AM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
Any 5 or 7 on the turn probably gets me to bet again, but here checking is the best move.

JJH3984 06-22-2007 11:32 AM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
[ QUOTE ]

Check > fold> > bet

[/ QUOTE ]

wtf? Folding is not better than betting. Check is obv. best.

Hair_of_the_Dog 06-22-2007 01:10 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
Any other opinions?

KitCloudkicker 06-22-2007 01:12 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
[ QUOTE ]
Any other opinions?

[/ QUOTE ]

betting again on the turn is retarded.

Niediam 06-22-2007 01:22 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
[ QUOTE ]
Any other opinions?

[/ QUOTE ]l

When three posters with 3000+ posts all say the same thing they are probably right. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

B_Movie_Fan 06-22-2007 01:37 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Any other opinions?

[/ QUOTE ]l

When three posters with 3000+ posts all say the same thing they are probably right. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know if this was meant half in jest or not, but it's wrong. Number of posts is not indicative of quality of play/analysis. I mean nothing against the 3 posters referenced on this thread, just that the statement above is pretty meaningless.

However, in this case they are all definitely right. I can't believe this thread is still going. It's a standard free card play.

Hair_of_the_Dog 06-22-2007 01:43 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
[ QUOTE ]
checks obv

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
check and it's not close.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I think this is why someone once told me that having position on your opponents was good.

Check.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
* grunch *

I take the free card here every time. Nice job on raising the flop for it as well as for equity but on the turn you've got absolutely nothing and it's unlikely you're going to fold 3 other players.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm guessing your question revolves more around pot equity than folding equity or the like (of which you have zero). Assuming that you are holding the best flush draw, a bet here would have neutral equity if all 3 opponents call again. Yes, you picked up a gutshot, but it's to the ass end and I wouldn't even factor that into the equation; make the Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] a 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] and then we have a value bet.

All that said, I think this is a pretty textbook example of when to take your free card. It's not hardly certain that nobody else has a higher flush draw, while not likely it is possible that someone's getting ready for a check/raise, and as I said, you are never going to get all 3 opponents to fold by firing two more barrels. So you don't have enough pot equity to bet your draw, and you don't have enough folding equity to semibluff...check it through.

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Any other opinions?

[/ QUOTE ]

betting again on the turn is retarded.

[/ QUOTE ]
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] This makes me feel good about getting advice (about small stakes holdem that is) from you guys. I'm glad that you found it obvious.

Nice work!

John49 06-22-2007 01:46 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
check. I guess you have the urge to steal. But a call outta 3 peeps means you're behind 99%, I would say. Even if a club comes, not necessarily good at this point. If you even had a gutshot added to the draw, it would be much more of a consideration, b/c then it's really becoming a steal play, but guising a pot build.

Person who said fold as 2nd option needs to keep brushing teeth and stop playing poker.

Aces McGee 06-22-2007 01:50 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
[ QUOTE ]
But a call outta 3 peeps means you're behind 99%, I would say.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you're being generous.

[ QUOTE ]
Even if a club comes, not necessarily good at this point.

[/ QUOTE ]

A club would be the best thing that could happen on the river.

[ QUOTE ]
If you even had a gutshot added to the draw,

[/ QUOTE ]

He does.

[ QUOTE ]
Person who said fold as 2nd option needs to keep brushing teeth and stop playing poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

At least you got that right. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

-McGee

Niediam 06-22-2007 04:44 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Any other opinions?

[/ QUOTE ]l

When three posters with 3000+ posts all say the same thing they are probably right. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know if this was meant half in jest or not, but it's wrong. Number of posts is not indicative of quality of play/analysis. I mean nothing against the 3 posters referenced on this thread, just that the statement above is pretty meaningless.

However, in this case they are all definitely right. I can't believe this thread is still going. It's a standard free card play.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was 100% serious. Obviously I don't think that everybody who posts a lot is always right but I guarentee you that the average poster with 2000ish+ posts (and I'm mostly stratigy posts - not OOT) is miles ahead of the average poster with 200 posts.

Post count and skill level probaably are not directly coorelated but those who post alot tend to work hard on their game and probably have been doing so for quite a while.

Hair_of_the_Dog 06-22-2007 05:07 PM

Re: 8c 6c on the button
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Any other opinions?

[/ QUOTE ]l

When three posters with 3000+ posts all say the same thing they are probably right. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't know if this was meant half in jest or not, but it's wrong. Number of posts is not indicative of quality of play/analysis. I mean nothing against the 3 posters referenced on this thread, just that the statement above is pretty meaningless.

However, in this case they are all definitely right. I can't believe this thread is still going. It's a standard free card play.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was 100% serious. Obviously I don't think that everybody who posts a lot is always right but I guarentee you that the average poster with 2000ish+ posts (and I'm mostly stratigy posts - not OOT) is miles ahead of the average poster with 200 posts.

Post count and skill level probaably are not directly coorelated but those who post alot tend to work hard on their game and probably have been doing so for quite a while.

[/ QUOTE ]

Remain calm. I wasn't inferring that the current posts are incorrect. I was just seeing if anyone had a different argument. I know what my answer is an wanted to see if others answer differed from mine and why.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.