beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpers
 

went to play live 5/10 NL after sitting through a rock garden of a 2/4 session, and just the softest action i've ever encountered (in california, anyway). i really didn't wanna leave the table, but 4 of the people there wouldn't shut the [censored] up about asking everybody (especially me) about jesus and if i'd like to visit their church and [censored]. this went on for a good 4 hours before the game finally broke. for the last [censored] time, i'm an arab. jesus is not my messiah and didn't die for my sins.

reminds me of freshman year when the outside of one of the halls would be littered with people handing out tiny bibles. one day i was just sick of it so after i was given one i went next to a tree, pulled out the rest of my waterbottle and put it in my pants, called out the guy to make sure he saw me, unzipped my pants, put the bible on the ground and poured the waterbottle onto it. he was incensed.

anyway, the champions of christ were either really pathetic or using an ingenous tilt ploy. i still can't figure out which.

final results: +340.

back to booze.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpers
 

what casino?

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

religion is one of the stupidest things i've encountered in my life.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
religion is one of the stupidest things i've encountered in my life.

[/ QUOTE ]im gonna go tochurch just to tilt u

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

I would die a little inside if I had to endure what you had to seeing as Im an Atheist. I almost would rather be gay as being gay seems to be more acceptable than being an Atheist.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
religion is one of the stupidest things i've encountered in my life.

[/ QUOTE ]

qfmft

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

I dont try to convert people to Mariner fans, why to they try to convert me to bible thumping dildos? I never had a down syndrome kid show up and try to convert me to a retard.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
I dont try to convert people to Mariner fans, why to they try to convert me to bible thumping dildos? I never had a down syndrome kid show up and try to convert me to a retard.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, I'm stealing that and you are just gonna have to sue me or something.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I dont try to convert people to Mariner fans, why to they try to convert me to bible thumping dildos? I never had a down syndrome kid show up and try to convert me to a retard.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, I'm stealing that and you are just gonna have to sue me or something.

[/ QUOTE ]

glad you liked it

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

Should have declared jihad on them.
"My god can beat up your god."

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

i thought u terrorists couldnt drink booze

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
I almost would rather be gay as being gay seems to be more acceptable than being an Atheist.

[/ QUOTE ]
I think you're very, very wrong. There very well may be more people who don't like atheists more than there are people who don't like gays, but the people who don't like gays seem to generally be worse. Quality over quantity.

I can't really say, since I'm neither (agnostic, straight).

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

you people are all retarded. there are plenty of religions that actively dont try to convert, dont stereotype because 50 million retards in alabama blew up some abortion clinics or because obnoxious bible-humpers tell you to praise jesus when all you really want is to win a new bigscreen.

the communists were athiest and they slaughtered a bajillion people just for being religious, so get your heads outta your [censored]. oh by your rationale, athiesm is the stupidest thing ever.

its not religion thats bad, its when idiot [censored] justify their stupid politics with their stupid religions.

OP, if they were really obnoxious bible-humping christians, tell them you are jesus. they will call/fold when you command them to. and then slap them in the head for taking his religion and turning it into the shitshow that has [censored] up your country worse than any disease ever could

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
you people are all retarded. there are plenty of religions that actively dont try to convert, dont stereotype because 50 million retards in alabama blew up some abortion clinics or because obnoxious bible-humpers tell you to praise jesus when all you really want is to win a new bigscreen.

its not religion thats bad, its when idiot [censored] justify their stupid politics with their stupid religions.

the communists were athiest and they slaughtered a bajillion people just for being religious, so get your heads outta your [censored]



[/ QUOTE ]



lol, you can spell obnoxious and benevolent, but not atheist, and we're the idiots?

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

i dont know how you ninja edited your post, but i swear benevolent was in there instead of "actively try to convert."

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
lol, you can spell obnoxious and benevolent, but not atheist, and we're the idiots?

[/ QUOTE ]

WOW GAME SET MATCH YOU WIN

Oops, wait.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
i dont know how you ninja edited your post, but i swear benevolent was in there instead of "actively try to convert."

[/ QUOTE ]

i prayed to god to do it for me

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
the communists were athiest and they slaughtered a bajillion people just for being religious, so get your heads outta your [censored]. oh by your rationale, athiesm is the stupidest thing ever.

[/ QUOTE ]
Atheism is only very very slightly more stupid than believing there is a god, IMHO.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
the communists were athiest and they slaughtered a bajillion people just for being religious, so get your heads outta your [censored]. oh by your rationale, athiesm is the stupidest thing ever.

[/ QUOTE ]
Atheism is only very very slightly more stupid than believing there is a god, IMHO.

[/ QUOTE ]

they are equally stupid, sir.

you argue we have no evidence, i say we are here, that's evidence. you say the big bang, i say who created the initial energy. we both argue round and round and waste BBV's and our own time.

The point is that religion as an idea is "bad" only as a justification for whatever evil politics these people would have had already. like anti-abortion, or world domination.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lol, you can spell obnoxious and benevolent, but not atheist, and we're the idiots?

[/ QUOTE ]

WOW GAME SET MATCH YOU WIN

Oops, wait.

[/ QUOTE ]


you are further validating my point. i called you an idiot for mis-spelling a word. that is not ad hominem.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

I say very very slightly more so, because in the very unlikely scenario where there is a god, and it actually does care whether we, as humans, believe that it exists or not (which I believe to be much more unlikely that it *DOES* care than it exists), it is very very slightly higher EV to believe there is a god.

Also, it's 5:30 AM here, so my brain isn't really working.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

I say I'm agnostic, that sames pretty diplomatic.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

Say you're a humanist. No one knows what the [censored] it means.

http://content.answers.com/main/cont...manism.svg.png

See avatar.

Holla.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

one can be agnostic and atheist.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]

reminds me of freshman year when the outside of one of the halls would be littered with people handing out tiny bibles. one day i was just sick of it so after i was given one i went next to a tree, pulled out the rest of my waterbottle and put it in my pants, called out the guy to make sure he saw me, unzipped my pants, put the bible on the ground and poured the waterbottle onto it. he was incensed.


[/ QUOTE ]

I lol'ed.

[ QUOTE ]
religion is the stupidest thing i've encountered in my life.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lol, you can spell obnoxious and benevolent, but not atheist, and we're the idiots?

[/ QUOTE ]

WOW GAME SET MATCH YOU WIN

Oops, wait.

[/ QUOTE ]


you are further validating my point. i called you an idiot for mis-spelling a word. that is not ad hominem.

[/ QUOTE ]


Ladies, ladies. There's no need for this. You're both idiots.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
I say very very slightly more so, because in the very unlikely scenario where there is a god, and it actually does care whether we, as humans, believe that it exists or not (which I believe to be much more unlikely that it *DOES* care than it exists), it is very very slightly higher EV to believe there is a god.

Also, it's 5:30 AM here, so my brain isn't really working.

[/ QUOTE ]

pascal's theorem ftw

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lol, you can spell obnoxious and benevolent, but not atheist, and we're the idiots?

[/ QUOTE ]

WOW GAME SET MATCH YOU WIN

Oops, wait.

[/ QUOTE ]


you are further validating my point. i called you an idiot for mis-spelling a word. that is not ad hominem.

[/ QUOTE ]

stop for a second to think clearly. your post, as written, claimed that my misspelling of the word ("you (can't spell) atheist") eliminates my ability to properly judge you to be an idiot ("and we're the idiots?").

instead of refuting my claim that you're an idiot, you claimed that i was unable to properly judge you an idiot. that is an ad hominem attack, idiot.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
lol, you can spell obnoxious and benevolent, but not atheist, and we're the idiots?

[/ QUOTE ]

WOW GAME SET MATCH YOU WIN

Oops, wait.

[/ QUOTE ]


you are further validating my point. i called you an idiot for mis-spelling a word. that is not ad hominem.

[/ QUOTE ]


Ladies, ladies. There's no need for this. You're both idiots.

[/ QUOTE ]

im in a combative mood today. [censored] you!

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
one can be agnostic and atheist.

[/ QUOTE ]

[censored]

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

If there were just one choice for a god, I'd agree with you, but given that we have thousands of different religions and the possibility that choosing the wrong one will just piss off the other, true god, I don't know what to think. I'm inclined to believe that the true god would react more favorably in the afterlife to someone who just didn't believe in anything than someone who actively believed in the false god (bastard!). therefore, we should hedge our bets by not believing in anything.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

OP its sounds like you and me should do business. I've got a lot to offer you pm if you're interested.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
If there were just one choice for a god, I'd agree with you, but given that we have thousands of different religions and the possibility that choosing the wrong one will just piss off the other, true god, I don't know what to think. I'm inclined to believe that the true god would react more favorably in the afterlife to someone who just didn't believe in anything than someone who actively believed in the false god (bastard!). therefore, we should hedge our bets by not believing in anything.

[/ QUOTE ]Actually I think the best way would be to put all the religions on a dartboard, blindfold yourself, and trust god to aim your dart at the right religion.

Someone should do it and let me know the result. I'll convert with you. I trust that god would not let someone lie to me about such an important matter.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If there were just one choice for a god, I'd agree with you, but given that we have thousands of different religions and the possibility that choosing the wrong one will just piss off the other, true god, I don't know what to think. I'm inclined to believe that the true god would react more favorably in the afterlife to someone who just didn't believe in anything than someone who actively believed in the false god (bastard!). therefore, we should hedge our bets by not believing in anything.

[/ QUOTE ]Actually I think the best way would be to put all the religions on a dartboard, blindfold yourself, and trust god to aim your dart at the right religion.

Someone should do it and let me know the result. I'll convert with you. I trust that god would not let someone lie to me about such an important matter.

[/ QUOTE ]

flip for gods?

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I say very very slightly more so, because in the very unlikely scenario where there is a god, and it actually does care whether we, as humans, believe that it exists or not (which I believe to be much more unlikely that it *DOES* care than it exists), it is very very slightly higher EV to believe there is a god.

Also, it's 5:30 AM here, so my brain isn't really working.

[/ QUOTE ]

pascal's theorem ftw

[/ QUOTE ]

Pascal's Theorem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_theorem

You are talking about Pascal's wager
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_wager

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpers
 

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I say very very slightly more so, because in the very unlikely scenario where there is a god, and it actually does care whether we, as humans, believe that it exists or not (which I believe to be much more unlikely that it *DOES* care than it exists), it is very very slightly higher EV to believe there is a god.

Also, it's 5:30 AM here, so my brain isn't really working.

[/ QUOTE ]

pascal's theorem ftw

[/ QUOTE ]

Pascal's Theorem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_theorem

You are talking about Pascal's wager
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_wager

[/ QUOTE ]

obv mistake. nh.

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
religion is one of the stupidest things i've encountered in my life.

[/ QUOTE ]

actually religion isnt stupid at all, its just what some ppl make of it(extremists etc) wich is dumb. I have no confession btw, oh maybe jah [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]

Re: beat: softest table i\'ve ever encountered and all were bible-humpe
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I say very very slightly more so, because in the very unlikely scenario where there is a god, and it actually does care whether we, as humans, believe that it exists or not (which I believe to be much more unlikely that it *DOES* care than it exists), it is very very slightly higher EV to believe there is a god.

Also, it's 5:30 AM here, so my brain isn't really working.

[/ QUOTE ]

pascal's theorem ftw

[/ QUOTE ]

Pascal's Theorem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal's_theorem

You are talking about Pascal's wager
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascal%27s_wager

[/ QUOTE ]

obv mistake. nh.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah I was wondering about that too. I looked up Pascal's Theorem and was wondering "WTF? What does that have to do with anything?"

But yeah, definitely Pascal's Wager FTW.