Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

anyone else "pay" more than they earned. (with sample size)

I have 5 databases and I was just looking at my lastest one and it shows three dollars more of rake than winnings over a small but, not too small sampling of 43k hands.

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

[ QUOTE ]
anyone else "pay" more than they earned. (with sample size)

I have 5 databases and I was just looking at my lastest one and it shows three dollars more of rake than winnings over a small but, not too small sampling of 43k hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, I've never not won more than 2ptbb or so over any sample.

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

rakeback FTW

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

This seems as good a time as any to ask, what does beating the rake mean?

Does beating the rake mean earning $200 after playing 1000 hands and paying $300 in rake, meaning you took $500 off the players?

Or does beating the rake mean me earning $500 after playing 1000 hands and paying $300 in rake, meaning you took $800 off the players?

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

Ignore my post like the poker community does Annie Duke and Howard Lederer.

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

there is no beating the rake. it always wins

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

lol i thought having profits < rake paid was standard

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

[ QUOTE ]
lol i thought having profits < rake paid was standard

[/ QUOTE ]

It is.

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

i think the rake is something around 3BB/100hands or not?

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
anyone else "pay" more than they earned. (with sample size)

I have 5 databases and I was just looking at my lastest one and it shows three dollars more of rake than winnings over a small but, not too small sampling of 43k hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, I've never not won more than 2ptbb or so over any sample.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a lie. DUCY?

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

Lol playing ftp 10nl the rake is 10ptbb/100, The only time I didn't beat it.

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
anyone else "pay" more than they earned. (with sample size)

I have 5 databases and I was just looking at my lastest one and it shows three dollars more of rake than winnings over a small but, not too small sampling of 43k hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Nope, I've never not won more than 2ptbb or so over any sample.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a lie. DUCY?

[/ QUOTE ]
ICY

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

[ QUOTE ]
there is no beating the rake. it always wins

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that's why you should play craps in your spare time, that rake you can beat. Run hot!

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

When I was playing 3/6 sh limit I was damn happy if my earnings equaled the 2.6BB/100 rake.

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

[ QUOTE ]
lol i thought having profits < rake paid was standard

[/ QUOTE ]

Borrowed from other threads...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...ie/stats-1.jpg

http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/8...1110039ks3.jpg

just a couple... NOT MY STATS.

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

Dayum General... is that limit or NL?

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

err, its limit

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

So thats why my RB was better back when I played more limit!

So I guess I should have rephrased my question slanted towards NL players.

Thanks for your input General.

Re: Beat: Paid $3 more rake than earned over last 43k hands
 

Approximately how much rake do big sites collect daily?