Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   STT Strategy (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=38)
-   -   $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=399996)

Indiana 05-10-2007 02:51 PM

$33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
PokerStars Tournament, Big Blind is t150 (6 handed) Converter on pregopoker.com

UTG (t2685)
UTG+1 (t2580)
CO (t910)
Hero (t2720)
SB (t2150)
BB (t2455)

Preflop: Hero is in Button with 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
<font color="gray">UTG folds</font>, <font color="gray">UTG+1 folds</font>, <font color="red">CO raises to t910 (All-in)</font>, <font color="red">Hero ?

Irieguy 05-10-2007 03:34 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
How is clicking "fold" dangerous?

Irieguy

Indiana 05-10-2007 03:36 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
[ QUOTE ]
How is clicking "fold" dangerous?

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL should I click fold here? Because I moved the slide bar to the right and clicked another button to the right and i liked my results.

BarryLyndon 05-10-2007 03:39 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How is clicking "fold" dangerous?

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL should I click fold here? Because I moved the slide bar to the right and clicked another button to the right and i liked my results.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you keep making calls like this, you're going to [censored] hate your results in the long run.

Barry

Irieguy 05-10-2007 03:40 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How is clicking "fold" dangerous?

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL should I click fold here? Because I moved the slide bar to the right and clicked another button to the right and i liked my results.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, really? This is a super standard fold.

Irieguy

Indiana 05-10-2007 03:41 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
i'd like to debate this. Shorty is obviously obviously behind my hand over 1000s and 1000s over trials. The two blinds are obviously obviously behind my hand over 1000s of trials. I think an overshove is in order here.

Indiana 05-10-2007 03:44 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How is clicking "fold" dangerous?

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL should I click fold here? Because I moved the slide bar to the right and clicked another button to the right and i liked my results.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, really? This is a super standard fold.

Irieguy

[/ QUOTE ]

These spots seem to be the only places I make money. Am I way off here? CO is pushing very very wide here as I am sure u know.

citanul 05-10-2007 03:49 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
put him on a range, then put the blinds on ranges they'd call with if you shoved, then sit down with a pencil and paper.

Indiana 05-10-2007 03:50 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
[ QUOTE ]
put him on a range, then put the blinds on ranges they'd call with if you shoved, then sit down with a pencil and paper.

[/ QUOTE ]

cit,

that was my idea but before i spend a 1/2 hour working it out I'd like to get some professional opinions. I mean, if this is an obvious leak in my game then fine I'll accept that but if its close I'd like to do the math.

citanul 05-10-2007 03:59 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
indi,

meow chow, just giving you grief for no good reason. apologies. i think the blinds are probably too deep for this to be correct, but i'm not 100% sure. i know that moves "like" this are where very bad players, and very good players make lots of chips, but medium players miss out. i know that jman in particular back in the day used to love shoving way weaker than A7 in spots "like" this.

Indiana 05-10-2007 04:00 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
ok cit its just that Irie came on and said fold like it was obvious but we know he's a fish so no biggie [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] seriously, i'll work it out later today and give a trip report.

Jshuttlesworth 05-10-2007 04:26 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
Indy I like that you like to gamble.

Indiana 05-10-2007 04:28 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
[ QUOTE ]
Indy I like that you like to gamble.

[/ QUOTE ]

I only like to gamble when I'm getting a +EV deal:) Not to say that I completely stay away from the horse track. But let's face it, we have to take every edge we can right?

BarryLyndon 05-10-2007 04:31 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
CO has 1000 chips. He has three guys in the 2,000s behind him. That's a good argument for him to push with KQ; A9+; pairs; if he's feeling adventerous, you can toss in Q10s and other assortments of "live" type cards.

Now, think about how A7s fairs against this range. And the blinds, 50/150. And your stack. And what kind of a stack you're going to need to play aggro and steal and be a threat later on. I think it's a pretty clear fold.

Barry

Indiana 05-10-2007 04:36 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
I think CO pushes much much wider than what ou think here. I'd say any pocket pair, J7s+, J8o+, Q6s+, Q7o+, K6o, K5s+, and any ace. Is this reasonable?

edit: I mean my god has nobody every made one these overshove calculators? these spots come up like every day

Slim Pickens 05-10-2007 04:42 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
1) I don't think you're ahead of CO's pushing range. Just because there are a lot of hands you beat in his range (and I debate he's pushing that wide, but I'll concede the point because it's not necessary to show this is a super-easy fold) doesn't mean you're ahead of the entire thing.

2) Even if you are ahead, you're not that far ahead. You're certainly not far enough ahead to make up the cEV~=$EV difference.

3) Overcalls absolutely [censored] you. Even if you're only getting overcalled 10% of the time, that's enough to kill any edge you might be able to cook into CO pushing range and the blinds' overcalling ranges.

Indiana 05-10-2007 04:43 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
[ QUOTE ]
1) I don't think you're ahead of CO's pushing range. Just because there are a lot of hands you beat in his range (and I debate he's pushing that wide, but I'll concede the point because it's not necessary to show this is a super-easy fold) doesn't mean you're ahead of the entire thing.

2) Even if you are ahead, you're not that far ahead. You're certainly not far enough ahead to make up the cEV~=$EV difference.

3) Overcalls absolutely [censored] you. Even if you're only getting overcalled 10% of the time, that's enough to kill any edge you might be able to cook into CO pushing range and the blinds' overcalling ranges.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok so I think its slightly +EV and I'd like to do the math. But before i spend 30 minutes doing it can we agree upon a range for CO so that my time brings some value to the forum today?

edit: And I'd also like to formulate some type of calculator with somebody's help to deal with these spots in the future.

Slim Pickens 05-10-2007 04:48 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
1) I don't think you're ahead of CO's pushing range. Just because there are a lot of hands you beat in his range (and I debate he's pushing that wide, but I'll concede the point because it's not necessary to show this is a super-easy fold) doesn't mean you're ahead of the entire thing.

2) Even if you are ahead, you're not that far ahead. You're certainly not far enough ahead to make up the cEV~=$EV difference.

3) Overcalls absolutely [censored] you. Even if you're only getting overcalled 10% of the time, that's enough to kill any edge you might be able to cook into CO pushing range and the blinds' overcalling ranges.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok so I think its slightly +EV and I'd like to do the math. But before i spend 30 minutes doing it can we agree upon a range for CO so that my time brings some value to the forum today?

edit: And I'd also like to formulate some type of calculator with somebody's help to deal with these spots in the future.

[/ QUOTE ]

Let's have some fun.
CO: {22+,A2+,K5s+,Q9s+,J9s+,K8o+,QTo+,JTo}
overcalls: {JJ+,AKs}

EDIT: I left A2+ out of CO's range.

Ocean613 05-10-2007 05:02 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
CO: {22+, Axs, KTs+, QJs+ JTs+, Axo, KTo+, QJo+ JTo+}
overcalls: {JJ+,AKs}

Indiana 05-10-2007 05:05 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
ok give me some time i have to go to a meeting then teach my moms how to buy airline tickets online to come visit me

Indiana 05-10-2007 05:28 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
well this is some tough exercise lol:) I could make some assumptions to make it easier but that would be cheating. Can we assume same blind calling ranges when I fold as to when I overshove?

Bubblefish 05-10-2007 05:41 PM

Re: $33 Regular - A typical, but dangerous spot
 
In case you find it interesting… Assuming no overcalling the equilibrium is:
CO push: 27.30 %
Btn call: 13,60 %
SB call: 18,10 %
BB call: 22,80 %

Calling with A7s is +0,2 % against this pushing range. Overcalling might make it –EV thou.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.