Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=56)
-   -   Interested in people's input (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=387833)

mescallynx 04-25-2007 04:07 AM

Interested in people\'s input
 
what do u think of this:

PokerStars Game #9575681271: Tournament #48601999,
$3.00+$0.40 Hold'em
No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2007/04/23 - 21:32:25 (ET)
Table '48601999 1' 10-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 3: wannabe55555 (2140 in chips)
Seat 4: DDOOMI (2340 in chips)
Seat 6: PERIS25 (2310 in chips)
Seat 7: bwompa (3590 in chips) is sitting out
Seat 9: IAmBatmam54 (1510 in chips)
Seat 10: Mescallynx (3110 in chips)
DDOOMI: posts small blind 75
PERIS25: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Mescallynx [Qh Jd]
bwompa: folds
bwompa has returned
IAmBatmam54: folds
Mescallynx: raises 300 to 450
wannabe55555: folds
DDOOMI: folds
PERIS25: calls 300
*** FLOP *** [7h 6c Qs]
PERIS25: bets 450
Mescallynx: raises 750 to 1200
PERIS25: calls 750
*** TURN *** [7h 6c Qs] [8d]
PERIS25: bets 450
Mescallynx: raises 450 to 900
PERIS25: calls 210 and is all-in
*** RIVER *** [7h 6c Qs 8d] [5h]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
PERIS25: shows [3s 4s] (a straight, Four to Eight)
Mescallynx: shows [Qh Jd] (a pair of Queens)
PERIS25 collected 4695 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 4695 | Rake 0
Board [7h 6c Qs 8d 5h]
Seat 3: wannabe55555 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: DDOOMI (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: PERIS25 (big blind) showed [3s 4s] and won (4695) with a
straight, Four to Eight
Seat 7: bwompa folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: IAmBatmam54 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 10: Mescallynx showed [Qh Jd] and lost with a pair of Queens

even though, as it was, i didn't make any bad plays.

I'm just curious about how bad i played this hand if, lets say, he was an aggressive player? or a "calling station"?
Would i play the hand any different? i raised preflop because the table had in fact been playing pretty tight. criticism is very much welcome.

mescallynx 04-25-2007 04:11 AM

Re: Interesting in people\'s input
 
oops, typo in the subject

mescallynx 04-25-2007 04:13 AM

Re: Interesting in people\'s input
 
people probably don't care because it's micro limits

Flintoff 04-25-2007 04:31 AM

Re: Interesting in people\'s input
 
I find the whole post hilarious!

Craggoo 04-25-2007 04:58 AM

Re: Interesting in people\'s input
 
Four words: No strategy in BBV

The Blunt 04-25-2007 05:03 AM

Re: Interesting in people\'s input
 
[ QUOTE ]
people probably don't care because it's micro limits

[/ QUOTE ]

hennnerz 04-25-2007 05:17 AM

Re: Interesting in people\'s input
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
people probably don't care because it's nano limits

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

kiwi 04-25-2007 06:17 AM

Re: Interested in people\'s input
 
Welcome Mescallynx. Don't worry about the odd negative comment - post all you like. You will soon get the hang of BBV <font color="white"> OMG - somewhere a village is missing an idiot lol</font>

pokerloser10056 04-25-2007 06:31 AM

Re: Interesting in people\'s input
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
people probably don't care because it's nano limits

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Dont we all start a "nano" limits?

uuser 04-25-2007 06:48 AM

Re: Interesting in people\'s input
 
Either he hits or he doesn't hit so it was 50-50 all the way and he wanted to suck you in to the coinflip situation and this time 50% wasn't on your side. Move on.

rebuyboy 04-25-2007 06:50 AM

Re: Interesting in people\'s input
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
people probably don't care because it has nothing to do with gambler2k4

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.