Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Televised Poker (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=39)
-   -   3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ---- (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=358813)

mattm951 03-19-2007 01:26 PM

3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
I was wondering if anyone knew what players to expect on tonight's episode. I guess this can be turned into the comment thread after it airs tonight. Be as it may.

takegawa 03-19-2007 01:30 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
I don't think they'll change players again.. So like last week among others there will be:
Phil Laak
Mike Matusow
Daniel Negreanu
and a few more..

ronitonline 03-19-2007 02:39 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
I dont think there are any new players, I WANT PHIL IVEY

johnnyrocket 03-19-2007 02:40 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
i could have sworn i heard them say ivey and antonius would be in it last week, i heard him say this a few weeks ago and they were not, this needs to happen soon

Jourdain 03-19-2007 04:28 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
I think that the Ivey-Benyamine-Booth table will be shown in the last 4 episodes.

ronitonline 03-19-2007 04:38 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
Last 4 episodes of the season?

LuckOfTheDraw 03-19-2007 05:11 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
i could have sworn i heard them say ivey and antonius would be in it last week, i heard him say this a few weeks ago and they were not, this needs to happen soon

[/ QUOTE ]

I remember hearing this also. I believe they said it two weeks ago, implying that, as you said, they would appear on last week's episode.

magicratx 03-19-2007 05:50 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
Is this just filmed over a couple of days or something (seem to remember Daniel Negraneu saying something about this in a magazine interview)?

ronitonline 03-19-2007 05:52 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
How long do you think it takes to record it?
They come back a week later to finish thier session?
HAHAHHA

Dynasty 03-19-2007 06:04 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
I dont think there are any new players, I WANT PHIL IVEY

[/ QUOTE ]

A lot of you guys are going to be very dissapointed when Ivey doesn't bluff four opponents while holding three-high, levitate the table with his penatrating glare, and cause all the cocktail waitress to do stripteases for him.

I think a more realistic expectation for Ivey's play on the show is that he'll sit there quietly most of the time, maybe talk a bit about golf, bet middle or bottome pair and get some tight player to fold top pair/weak kicker, and cause all the cocktail waitress to do stripteases for him.

LuckOfTheDraw 03-19-2007 06:06 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think a more realistic expectation for Ivey's play on the show is that he'll sit there quietly most of the time, maybe talk a bit about golf, bet middle or bottome pair and get some tight player to fold top pair/weak kicker, and cause all the cocktail waitress to do stripteases for him.


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm fine with this.

ronitonline 03-19-2007 06:10 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
.
I dont care about big plays l, I care about nice plays, and good plays.
I want to see a bunch of +EV plays regardless of how small the pot or what the cards are, and I think Ivey picks some good spots and makes +EV plays and therefor I want to watch him.
He isnt stacking off like Eli or Harman, and he isnt check calling with AK twice and checking the 2nd nuts on the river or checking a full house on the end like harman did and tilly did on PAD.
I like watching him cause him > life > you

RichGangi 03-19-2007 09:09 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
looks like DN's trying to be a liiiiiittle too tricky. With this group, I wouldnt be limping too much with BPP's.

RichGangi 03-19-2007 09:17 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
someone needs to explain to me why Harmetz called that flop raise/overcall....also, why did the producers let him and Shak on the show? Such boring players w/ zero imagination.

TheGrasshopper 03-19-2007 09:19 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
Am I the only one who wished Mike would have stacked DN?

RichGangi 03-19-2007 09:22 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
LOL. Dan Harmetz is such a GD NIT.

alphatmw 03-19-2007 09:30 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
who the [censored] are these new players and why should i care

effang 03-19-2007 09:33 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one who wished Mike would have stacked DN?

[/ QUOTE ]

only one.

RichGangi 03-19-2007 09:34 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
F Chris 'Jesus'....how bout Chris 'ABC' Ferguson....too easy to play perfect against him in this type of game.

RichGangi 03-19-2007 09:35 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Am I the only one who wished Mike would have stacked DN?

[/ QUOTE ]

only one.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. Its always entertaining to see Mike go busto.

checkpot 03-19-2007 09:36 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
DN said in his blog some time ago that the last lineup on this season was the toughest table he had ever played on.. all top pros.. looking forward to this!

effang 03-19-2007 09:42 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
shak is a moody, sensitive, little bitch.

edit: it was a good play, but i think he is just making moves because he always looks angry haha.

another edit: he's still horrible

a 9 on the river would have been horrible for you daniel...

1 minute later...yeah, that 9 would have been horrible for me...

Do you see his face? He makes plays just because he's angry. He was pretty much taunting daniel saying "what did i have?"

nice check raise to represent the flush. excellent play if he was looking to get a call!

RichGangi 03-19-2007 09:42 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
very impressed with Shaks c/r there....didnt think he had it in him.

effang 03-19-2007 09:43 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
and how bad was that check by Laak? he beats almost EVERYTHING that Antonio was holding. Was he that afraid of QT gut shot, or baby set? come on!

RichGangi 03-19-2007 09:44 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
and how bad was that check by Laak? he beats almost EVERYTHING that Antonio was holding. Was he that afraid of QT gut shot, or baby set? come on!

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. He played the hand horribly and got lucky. Gotta love this game.

TheGrasshopper 03-19-2007 09:45 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
Agree. A 15,000 dollar bet likely gets called by Antonio.

EC10 03-19-2007 09:46 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
antonio tiiiiiiilt!

Tom1975 03-19-2007 09:50 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
LOL @ Gabe:

"One has a hot Hollywood girlfriend... and the other goes to massage parlors."

RichGangi 03-19-2007 09:55 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
LOL
AJ-Why did Dan Shak raise there?
GK-I have no idea.

What a horrible play. Like Gabe said, if you want to rep. the flush I think youve gotta raise more. Like waaay more.

bigshowmack 03-19-2007 10:01 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
The best part of this entire episode was the preview of next week and knowing that all of these turds will finally be gone and I will start caring about paying attention to the show again.

RichGangi 03-19-2007 10:01 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
anyone else feel like that last hand with Laak and Antonio was a case of extreme softplay? How does PL not raise the river against AE? Give me a break.

RichGangi 03-19-2007 10:02 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
The best part of this entire episode was the preview of next week and knowing that all of these turds will finally be gone and I will start caring about paying attention to the show again.

[/ QUOTE ]

AMEN.

O Fen�meno 03-19-2007 10:03 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
i had to change my pants after i saw that lineup

sightless 03-19-2007 10:05 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
Did anyone else get annoyed @ Gabes commentary...

Was that fold with tt on all diamond 78J(?) flop that bad?

RichGangi 03-19-2007 10:06 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
Did anyone else get annoyed @ Gabes commentary...

Was that fold with tt on all diamond 78J(?) flop that bad?

[/ QUOTE ]
For that price, against those players, yes. IMO.

brian4cards 03-19-2007 10:08 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
I wish they would show graphics on this show telling how much each player has in their stack and how much they are up or down for the session. Is there a reason they don't do this? It seems like an obvious addition.

60Vauban 03-19-2007 10:13 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
if they showed stack amounts it would betray the fact that they don't broadcast every hand played. Seems they like to keep the wizard hidden behind the curtain.

Anders 03-19-2007 10:18 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
LOL @ Gabe:

"One has a hot Hollywood girlfriend... and the other goes to massage parlors."

[/ QUOTE ]

Hahaha, yeah, Gabe burned Mike several times in the last like 20 minutes of the show. Loved it.

ronitonline 03-19-2007 10:26 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
DNs JJ and QQ were pretty gross, I liked his flat call with 97 though that was pretty good play.

Esfandari is getting unlucky like usual, and the new players are pretty nubtastic.

ronitonline 03-19-2007 10:28 PM

Re: 3/19/07 --- High Stakes Poker ----
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
LOL @ Gabe:

"One has a hot Hollywood girlfriend... and the other goes to massage parlors."

[/ QUOTE ]

Hahaha, yeah, Gabe burned Mike several times in the last like 20 minutes of the show. Loved it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Gabe is incredible.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.