How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

Semibrag. This winrate is obviously not sustainable when 6tabling 200nl. whats the highest unsustainable winrate anybody has ever had over 40k hands? Obviously 40K hands is nothing. Gonna have to play about 300K hands atleast before i can find a realsitic winrate.

Just curious how good people have run over small sample sizes (but atleast 10k).

http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/5...nlbigupnw7.jpg

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

have fun with the downswing

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

moveup

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

i know thats what ive been thinking lol. at some point im gonna have a really nasty downswing just to even things out. and im realllllly not looking forward to it. the multiple 6-10 buyin downswings ive had in even this small 40K sample were mindwrecking enough.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
moveup

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

i wanna play 100K hands at this level to see how ive done before moving up.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

post your PT stats too...

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
i wanna play 100K hands at this level to see how ive done before moving up.

[/ QUOTE ]

move up. At least take a shot

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

uhm 7 ptbb is not that unreal is it ?

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

As you can see ive taken shots before and it hasn't really worked out. ive got just over 50buyins for 400NL, but since i got killed last time i was there i want to make sure my game is good enough before i move up. and also im really curious to what winrate i can sustain in the longrun at 200nl. im going to take a shot at 60buyins which should be soonish.

http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/9704/statsdc8.jpg

And yes from what ive heard the 200nl game is hard to get a winrate above 6ptbb/100 while 6tabling.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

ROFL, u play at stars! You could've had 2200 in rakeback if you played eleswhere. Conversely, maybe you'd win less at another site. 2k is 2k! ROFL!

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
i wanna make 100K at this level before moving up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

how 7bb/100 is not sustainable..?

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

7BB/100 is sustainable

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

omg 7ptbb/100 for 40k hands is so sick

/sarcasm

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

whoops. i was thinking he was at 14PTBB/100. yeah, 7PTBB is solid but far from amazing.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

Python....who ass is in that pic!?!?!?!

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

your winrate is highest at 5/10, you should be playing more there obv.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

I heard this sick dude called luigisomething has over 10ptbb winrate at 200/400NL over like 30k hands.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
7BB/100 is sustainable

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

I'm currently at 16.5 BB/100 for 45k hands, with the biggest downswing being 4 buyins or so.

Just imagine a straight red line connecting the lower left and upper right corner of the pokergrapher window.

Edit: so that's 8.3 PTBB/100.

We should probably agree if we're gonna start using BB/100 with the PT fix.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

Improve your NL10 and NL25 skillz, then move back up to NL1000 obv.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

I win.
http://img177.imageshack.us/img177/4785/all200nlbx7.jpg

For some reason my poker patterns is giving a pop up saying it has expired but if it was working and I set it to show my last 22k hands it would be around 23/24 BB/100. Also this graph includes NL3 which I was showing a loss for at that period.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

i couldn't 6table at full tilt until the beta came out because of no resizeable windows.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
i couldn't 6table at full tilt until the beta came out because of no resizeable windows.

[/ QUOTE ]


what time frame are we talking?

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

WTF? Buy a second monitor! You have 11k!

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
For some reason my poker patterns is giving a pop up saying it has expired but.....

[/ QUOTE ]

reinstall it <3

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

wow that is impressive GAL. good work. i wish i could have that little variance.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

well the beta came out a few weeks ago, and i only started 200nl recently. been playing about 600 hands per day (1 hour / day). the beta resizable windows still are awful though. you can barely read the player names when the windows are small..unlike in pokerstars where they are crystal clear. until they sort that out im going to stay at stars i think.

also at this rate of only 1hour/day of play im going to be spernova in a few months time...and supernova is basically 27% rakeback i heard...so maybe ill stay at stars afterall... i hear the games are easier on stars too.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
moveup

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
play blackjack

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

There ya go:
http://img45.imageshack.us/img45/212/46kks3.jpg

No, i can't put it in $, because I don't know how to make Pokergrapher convert £ to $, and the $ hands in the db skew the results.

Edit: this is all between $100NL and $500NL.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

7ptbb is sustainable

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

for a 6tabler at 200nl 7 is sustainable? i thought the games were too tough nowadays to get anything about 6? and even less for a multitabler? read that somewhere in ssnl i believe

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
read that somewhere in ssnl i believe

[/ QUOTE ]

Then it must be true.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

glad you agree..lol

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
for a 6tabler at 200nl 7 is sustainable? i thought the games were too tough nowadays to get anything about 6? and even less for a multitabler? read that somewhere in ssnl i believe

[/ QUOTE ]

just because some dude (or dudes for that matter) says that a certain win rate is not sustainable, doesnt mean its actually the case. remember, plenty of people in these forums are actually terrible or mediocre poker players.

dont set some artificial limit on what you think is possible. just try and constantly improve, experiment with new styles and techniques, and the results will take care of themselves.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I heard this sick dude called luigisomething has over 10ptbb winrate at 200/400NL over like 30k hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

That "dude" you speak about is no other than Patrick Antonius, as you probably already know. He runs at 50 ptbb/100 in life. On top of his great looks and charisma, he has a great looking girlfriend that gives him great rakeback.

Re: How long has anybody ever run this good at 200NL?
 

the games might be tougher, but they're still easily beatable.

i've found that some of the best games are right after the site goes down, at least for ftp, people literally just hand you money.

if that's what the partypoker games were like a few years ago, then i really regret being young and never playing there then.