Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Micro Stakes Limit (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   Firing the Second Barrel (long) (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=301852)

jrz1972 01-08-2007 10:04 PM

Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
I’m going to be taking a break from limit for a while to cut my teeth at NL. Despite frequenting this forum for the past 2 ½ years, I’ve never done a Pooh-Bah or C/T post, so I thought this would be a good time to bang out something substantial.

I want to focus on a problem that frequently vexes newer players. You look at your hand and see big picture cards. It’s folded around to you, and you raise. A couple of players call, but that’s okay because you know most micro-limit villains will call with all sorts of stuff. The flop misses you, but again that’s okay because you know all about continuation bets, so you fire a c-bet out there. Unfortunately, one villain calls. The turn is a brick, and now you have to decide how to continue on the turn. Should you fire the second barrel?

It’s not a bad idea to start at the very beginning and consider why this is a touchy problem, even if it’s a little obvious. Deciding whether to fire a second barrel on the turn or not is close because there are two main possibilities for what is going on when villain calls your flop bet:

1. Villain is drawing. Micro-limit games are chock-full of players who will peel the flop unbelievably light, but who will give up when the bet size doubles. The problem when you have whiffed overcards or somesuch is that even when you’re ahead, villain often has as many as 10 outs on the turn, and it would be correct for him to call your turn bet if he knew what you had. For example, if villain holds Js Tc on a Kc 9d 4d 2h board, he actually has 10 outs against your As Qs. He’ll normally fold to a bet because he has to fear he’s drawing to only his gutshot, but the point is that his fold is a mistake according to the Fundamental Theorem of Poker. If he knew you had whiffed overs, he should call with his 10-outer. In fact, he should often call with just a 6-outer i.e. any two cards that don’t match cards in your hand. And as we know, when villains make mistakes, we win. So in this sort of scenario, we definitely want to bet the turn to push villain into a bad fold. Note that if villain decides to call, all is not lost since we’ll sometimes win at showdown with our UI A-high. In that case firing the second barrel really just amounts to a value-bet, even if we didn’t know that at the time.

2. Villain has a made hand that he’s not folding. Micro-limit games are also chock-full of villains who call preflop raises, flop bottom pair, and then automatically call down no matter what. In that case, we don’t want to bet the turn, obviously. We would rather get a free card than bet villain’s hand for him.

In case (1) we want to bet the turn. In case (2), we don’t. Our job is to try to use our skills at reading the board and reading our opponents to try to make an educated guess of where we are.

So suppose we bet the turn. When we c-bet the turn, we are obviously rooting for villain to fold, so we know what a “good” result is. What is a “bad” result? Bad results come in two flavors:

1. Villain calls. This is bad because it means we’re either behind, or villain has made a “correct” decision to pursue his draw. Depending on our position and the likelihood that villain is drawing, this may not be terrible, but it isn’t usually what we want to see.

2. Villain raises or checkraises. On one hand, this is bad for the same reason (1) is bad; we’re out 1 bb. Where this is really bad is when we have a hand with enough outs that we’re forced to call the raise. This is a point that’s worth repeating because even many intermediate players completely misunderstand it. When you c-bet the turn with a good draw and get raised, it is a disaster.

Many players don’t get this concept. They raise preflop, flop the nut flush draw, and fire away on the flop (correctly). They then continue on the turn, get checkraised by their single opponent, and figure “Oh well I have so many outs I don’t mind getting raised.” This is wrong, because villain has played optimally against your hand. You lose according to the Fundamental Theorem of Poker.

To see this more concretely, put yourself in villain’s seat. You see that annoying-yet-sexy TAG open-raise in the CO, and you call in the BB with 6d 6c. The flop is Ks 7s 6h, giving you bottom set. Now suppose I told you that the TAG had As 2s and would keep betting until he got raised. It should be obvious that your optimal play is to c/c the flop and c/r the non-spade turn. This charges the TAG the maximum to pursue his draw. When villain plays optimally against the TAG, the TAG has lost Sklansky dollars, and villain has won Sklansky dollars. In short, getting check-raised on this board is the worst possible outcome of the hand for our Hero, unless of course he rivers the flush. He has paid 2bbs to see a river that he could have seen for free.

When we c-bet the turn, getting called is generally not good, and getting raised is definitely bad, particularly if we are forced to pay off the raise. When we decide whether to c-bet the turn, we will want to make a reasoned calculation of how likely it is that either of these outcomes will occur.

Now that we know what we’re trying to accomplish and what we’re trying to avoid, let’s look at some example hands. (Disclaimer: I do not claim to be God’s gift to the poker world, and I am sure that if some of these example hands were posted as stand-alone hands for evaluation, some of them would generate debate. Firing the second barrel is often a ticklish decision that’s highly opponent-dependent. I just want to present some hands where I think various factors weigh heavily in one direction or the other, not claim that my judgement is infallible). In all of these cases, assume that villain has raised preflop, c-bet the flop, and where applicable has been checked to on the turn by a single opponent.

We’ll first consider hands where Hero has position.

HAND 1:
Hero’s hand: As Ks in position.
Villain: a known TAG.
Hero open-raises from MP and is called only by villain in the BB.
Flop: Qh 7d 5s
Turn: 2d

This is a good example of a hand that should not be c-bet on the turn. TAGs generally don’t call uber-dry flops just for the hell of it; villain will have some sort of a made hand a large majority of the time. It is fairly clear that Hero should pass on a c-bet and take the free card if offered. Note that Hero is getting checkraised unusually often here if he bets. Granted, we have an easy fold to a c/r, but we forfeit the chance to suck out for free by c-betting.

If you want an even stronger example of when not to c-bet the turn against a TAG, change Hero’s hand to Ks Qs and change the board to Ah 7d 5s 2d.

HAND 2:
Hero’s hand: As Ks in position.
Villain: a known LPP.
Hero open-raises from MP and is called only by villain in the BB.
Flop: Qh 7d 5s
Turn: 2d

Bet that turn! This is the exact same hand as Hand 1, except we replaced the TAG villain with Fishy McFish, who loves to peel flops with all sorts of garbage. Hero frequently has the best hand. This is exactly the sort of situation where we don’t absolutely hate getting called. As soon as the flop hits, you should order up your “bet, bet, check behind” line against this sort of opponent. If our LPP villain musters the nerve to checkraise, we have a super-easy fold, so that’s no big disaster.

HAND 3:
Hero’s hand: As Ks in position.
Villain: a known LPP.
Hero open-raises from MP and is called only by villain in the BB.
Flop: 9h 8h 2c
Turn: 2d

Again, this is a good time to show villain our second barrel. This board is draw-heavy, and just because villain called us on the flop doesn’t mean we’re beaten. Betting the turn with the intention of checking down on the river UI should be standard on this board against this villain. Note that LPPs don’t checkraise-semibluff with open-enders or flush draws, so we can fold with confidence if we get popped.

HAND 4:
Hero’s hand: Ks Qs in position.
Villain: a known LPP.
Hero open-raises from MP and is called only by villain in the BB.
Flop: Js 8h 7c
Turn: 2s

This one is debatable, but betting should at least receive strong consideration. Even LPPs will fold A-high, gutshots, etc. when a double-sized turn bet comes out. Getting checkraised would suck because we have to pay it off, but LPP’s don’t check-raise very often. I would take the free card against tricky or aggressive opponents.

HAND 5:
Hero’s hand: As Ks in position.
Villain: a known tricky LAG.
Hero open-raises from MP and is called only by villain in the BB.
Flop: Js 7c 2c
Turn: 6c

Firing the second barrel on this turn against this opponent is a mistake. Tricky players, especially LAGs, love to bluff- and semibluff-checkraise preflop raisers on this sort of board. They will sometimes have total air, but they’ll often have something like Ac 8h or 5h 4h which just picked up a flush draw and an oesd respectively. I don’t know about you, but I hate folding overcards in this situation. Obviously we have to fold if we get check-raised. Consistently calling turn check-raises with whiffed overs is a great way to drain your bankroll. But we’re getting pushed off the best hand much more often than we’d like if we c-bet this one.

This is where the turn “value check” comes into its own. Tricky LAGs are the perfect target for this line. When we check behind on the turn, most LAGs will feel morally obliged to bluff any river card no matter what they hold. We call, of course. This line involves us putting 1 bb in the pot, just like betting the turn and checking down on the river does, but it has the advantage of guaranteeing that we get to showdown with a hand that compares decently to the LAG’s range. Be sure you understand why this line sucks against LPPs but is gold against LAGs. LPP’s don’t bluff-checkraise, and it’s hard to induce river bluffs off them. LAG’s have all sorts of tricky checkraises in their playbook, and it’s easy to induce bluffs off them. Save the “value check” line for LAGs. Just keep pounding on the fish.

Now lets suppose that Hero is out of position. Being out of position sucks, especially when you’re HU and face a close turn decision. In some ways, though, this makes our decision a little easier because we no longer have the option to take a free card. If we check, we are basically giving up on our hand. When we raise preflop, bet the flop, and check the turn, even the most dimwitted villains are capable of figuring out what’s going on and sticking a bet in against our obvious overcards. (This is why the screwplay is so cool when it works). Since lines that involve checking behind are now out of the picture, it often comes down to b/f and c/f, with the occasional c/c and b/c (ugh) mixed in.

HAND 6:
Hero’s hand: Ks Qs out of position.
Villain: not a complete idiot.
Hero open-raises from MP and is called only by villain on the button.
Flop: As 7c 2d
Turn: 6c

Against most opponents, this is a clear c/f. We took our shot on the flop, and villain says he’s not scared of the ace that we’re supposed to have but don’t. That said, there are villains out there who peel A-high flops with air and then fold the turn to continued aggression. It sincerely bothers me that such a person’s vote counts the same as mine on election day. Against these opponents I will fire again on the turn, but I need a definite read to do this.

HAND 7:
Hero’s hand: As Ks out of position.
Villain: a known LPP.
Hero open-raises from MP and is called only by villain on the button.
Flop: Th 8d 3c
Turn: 8c

This is a turn c-bet. LPPs like to call flops like this with junk, but they’re less inclined to call the turn with said junk. They also like to give free showdowns when we check the river. If the LPP raises, you know where the fold key is located. As turn decisions go, this one is pretty easy.

HAND 8:
Hero’s hand: Qs Js out of position.
Villain: an unknown.
Hero open-raises from MP and is called only by villain on the button.
Flop: 8s 7h 2c
Turn: Ks

This hand is a clear c-bet for two reasons. First of all, the turn card is a scare card for villain. He often has the “fold to any bet” box clicked as soon as that K hits the felt. So our fold equity just spiked. Furthermore, we’re going to call a bet anyway, so betting and getting called costs us absolutely nothing. Even getting raised isn’t so bad because it really only costs us one bet instead of two (since we were going to have to pay one bet to see the river no matter what). The “bad” results from c-betting are no longer so bad in this case, so we might as well leverage our fold equity with a bet. Use that scare card!

This has been a long post. Hopefully it has given you something to think about, even if that something is just tl;dr.

unterfish 01-08-2007 10:10 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
Wow. Too long for me! Nice hand probably!

thunk 01-08-2007 10:38 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
I liked this article. I play shorthanded, so my game is usually pretty aggressive. I find myself winning constantly by gunning the turn on a tight/passive villain. These limits are chock-full of light-drawing donks, but I'm definitely not complaining. I didn't read it all, but congratulations on a very solid post.

tiltaholic 01-08-2007 10:41 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
this is going to be a good read for me tomorrow.

OziBattler 01-08-2007 10:42 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
thx jrz. I read the whole thing. nh sir.

[ QUOTE ]
Many players don’t get this concept. They raise preflop, flop the nut flush draw, and fire away on the flop (correctly). They then continue on the turn, get checkraised by their single opponent, and figure “Oh well I have so many outs I don’t mind getting raised.” This is wrong, because villain has played optimally against your hand. You lose according to the Fundamental Theorem of Poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

I admit I am sometimes guilty of this so this part rung true for me.

How bout some examples where hero has gutshots both with position and OOP

ozi

Bona 01-08-2007 11:00 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
I have benefited often from your posts and look forward to them. It so happens I am struggling mentally to improve my play with overcards in my hand as well as with over cards to my pair on the board. I will refer to your post frquently as I try to improve. NH sir and good luck with NL.

00Snitch 01-08-2007 11:29 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]

This has been a long post. Hopefully it has given you something to think about, even if that something is just tl;dr.
[ QUOTE ]

Wow. Too long for me! Nice hand probably!


[/ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]

lol


yep. nh.

confirmed alot of concepts ive been trying to get my head around lately.

i think my problem is that i understand you should c-bet less frequently on the turn, on dry boards then on drawey boards. but i find that i will often fire again on a drawey board, and be forced to call ac/r.

hrmmm, let me get this straight once and for-all. please correct me if wrong (which im sure i am):

- be more inclined to fire the second barrel when the board is dry.
- if you pick up a redraw on the turn, be less inclided to fire the second barrel, even on a drawey board because you have to call a c/r

does this then mean that if you dont pick up a solid redraw on the turn it is better to bet and fold to a c/r then it would be if you did pick up a solid draw? [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] whoa, why do i get the feeling that is very wrong...

lets say you ahve A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
you raise in position and are called by the BB and its HU.

flop comes T[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. you c-bet that. yes?

if turn is 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] you are better checking behind. because you now must call a c/r

if the turn is 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] you would be better firing again and folding to a c/r.

.... is that really fkn dumb... i feel so stupid sometimes...

tyler_cracker 01-08-2007 11:30 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
jrz,

terrific post. this is a common situation and you have done a great job of summarizing the salient points and providing good examples. nice work!

i am adding this to the micros library wiki under the "overcards" section.

00Snitch 01-08-2007 11:35 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
i am adding this to the micros library wiki under the "overcards" section.

[/ QUOTE ]

damn, now my stupid post will be imortalized... [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

unterfish 01-08-2007 11:41 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i am adding this to the micros library wiki under the "overcards" section.

[/ QUOTE ]

damn, now my stupid post will be imortalized... [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Lol. And also mine. And I am not happy about this.

bozlax 01-08-2007 11:52 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
For example, if villain holds Js Tc on a Kc 9d 4d 2h board, he actually has 10 outs against your As Qs.

[/ QUOTE ]

[nit]9[/nit]

[ QUOTE ]
It sincerely bothers me that such a person’s vote counts the same as mine on election day.

[/ QUOTE ]

Like people that drive brown cars. "Lookit me, I'm headed down the freeway in a 75 MPH turd!"

Nice article. Glad to see I got most of the examples "right". [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]

bozlax 01-08-2007 11:53 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
i am adding this to the micros library wiki under the "overcards" section.

[/ QUOTE ]

damn, now my stupid post will be imortalized... [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
Lol. And also mine. And I am not happy about this.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not to worry, unter...I'm guessing that the automatic maid will clear out most of your posts on the 1st of April.

Edit: I gotta ask...if the OP was too long for you to bother reading, why the hell are you reading the responses?

unterfish 01-09-2007 12:09 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
Boz. Dont get mean. I just started to like you.
Too bad!

TripleH68 01-09-2007 12:25 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
Good work. Playing these situations well is stressful(and essential to winning) when moving up in stakes.

Rev. Good Will 01-09-2007 12:52 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
good read

If you thought "too long; didn't read" and skimmed all the way down to my post, you are really missing out.

One of my most recent glaring leaks in LHE, mentioned very much in this article, was my (lack of) consideration of board textures. Good ol' NLHE cash helped me plug that up.

bennyhana 01-09-2007 12:52 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Like people that drive brown cars. "Lookit me, I'm headed down the freeway in a 75 MPH turd!"

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] and who might you be referring to? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

nice post as always jrz. definate favorite. [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

bozlax 01-09-2007 12:58 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Like people that drive brown cars. "Lookit me, I'm headed down the freeway in a 75 MPH turd!"

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] and who might you be referring to? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

nice post as always jrz. definate favorite. [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

People who drive brown CARS, benny...I've spent plenty of my own time driving brown trucks (to the cattle market, filled with, well, cattle, and covered in [censored]).

Edit: besides, UPS trucks only go 75 when they get caught in a tornado.

bennyhana 01-09-2007 01:04 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Like people that drive brown cars. "Lookit me, I'm headed down the freeway in a 75 MPH turd!"

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] and who might you be referring to? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

nice post as always jrz. definate favorite. [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

People who drive brown CARS, benny...I've spent plenty of my own time driving brown trucks (to the cattle market, filled with, well, cattle, and covered in [censored]).

Edit: besides, UPS trucks only go 75 when they get caught in a tornado.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry, lol. UPS 'trucks' are called package 'cars', I get confused sometimes talking to the outside world. Carry on.

yes, there are very few tornadoes here in western CO.

bozlax 01-09-2007 01:05 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
yes, there are very few tornadoes here in western CO.

[/ QUOTE ]

But watch the eff out for avalanches.

marchron 01-09-2007 02:03 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
nh.

One addendum, though: in Hand 1, I'm only check/folding against straightforward, unimaginative players. If Villain has shown himself to be a little tricksy I might give it one more go on the turn, especially if we're OOP (it'd be a bet/fold, of course).

The reason is a great deal of good players might float for one bet on that flop (Q75r) with something like 66, thinking that AQ/KQ/AA/KK/QQ will fire again on the turn but missed hands, like AK/AJ — but also JJ-99 — will not. Thus, Villain can fold to a turn bet but value-bet (or even get us off a better hand) if we check.

But that's incredibly read-specific. With no reads except TAG stats, checking behind or check/folding is fine.

Absolution 01-09-2007 02:31 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
Good post. I agree with most of what you said. I might debate that waiting for the turn with a set against an aggressive opponent on a coordinated board is the optimal play.

Christian_Peters 01-09-2007 02:31 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
This is [censored] great. It really isn't that long, and I kind of wish it was longer - I wish you would do a follow-up w/ some more examples and cover any other pertinent ideas you didn't cover here (if there are any). VNH. Thanks.

Watkins 01-09-2007 04:56 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
jrz1972,

Excellent post and just at the right time for me as well as I'm struggling with turn c-bets. One question, presumably hand 6 isn't just a bad spot for c-bet, for instance would you fire again here with KK, QQ, JJ?

HAND 6:
Hero’s hand: Ks Qs out of position.
Villain: not a complete idiot.
Hero open-raises from MP and is called only by villain on the button.
Flop: As 7c 2d
Turn: 6c

fabadam 01-09-2007 05:01 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
Fantastic. I should have read this 4 months ago, it wouldn't have cost me 200 big bets to learn it at 6-max then.

ciro bonano 01-09-2007 07:20 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
Great post, just read and re-read it. I really like the 'value check' line, especially when villain bets the turn, I call, he flips over a monster and I just lost the minimum.
[nit]
[ QUOTE ]
In all of these cases, assume that Hero has raised preflop, c-bet the flop, and where applicable has been checked to on the turn by a single opponent.

[/ QUOTE ][/nit]

And I also totally agree with:
[ QUOTE ]
This is [censored] great. I kind of wish it was longer - I wish you or another CT would do a follow-up w/ some more examples and cover any other pertinent ideas you didn't cover here (if there are any). VNH. Thanks.

[/ QUOTE ]

Big Folder 01-09-2007 12:48 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
great great post. I've been too automatic with my c-bets, simply betting the flop and c/f the turn and yesterday I just realized I needed to change that. Your post will help a lot in that regard.

My question is a lot of things change when you're multiway. At 3/6 live your often seeing the turn with 2-3 donks. C-betting here obviously is a whole new beast when dealing with several guys.

There is likely value in it because you see these guys who call down with any part of the board check/call a As, 9s, 8c flop, Qc turn, 5s river but fold to a river bet with an "ay-yah." They didn't have the A, almost every draw hit or paired them up(10-7 being the sole exception) and they still didn't have enough to call. [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] So charge them on the turn and check the river.

MrWookie 01-09-2007 03:06 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
thx jrz. I read the whole thing. nh sir.

[ QUOTE ]
Many players don’t get this concept. They raise preflop, flop the nut flush draw, and fire away on the flop (correctly). They then continue on the turn, get checkraised by their single opponent, and figure “Oh well I have so many outs I don’t mind getting raised.” This is wrong, because villain has played optimally against your hand. You lose according to the Fundamental Theorem of Poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

I admit I am sometimes guilty of this so this part rung true for me.

How bout some examples where hero has gutshots both with position and OOP

ozi

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a very good post, but I, like Aussie, feel compelled to comment on this part. In fact, I already have.

When you have a nut flush draw against a loose opponent, yeah, sure, you don't want to be c/r'd. However, there are many more factors that come into play when you're making your decision to bet.

1. How many outs you actually have.

As your number of outs increases, your equity deficit gets so small that the cost of your semibluff is so small that your opponent has to fold a better hand very rarely for the bet to be +EV. Additionally, it's possible (albeit very, very rare) for you to currently have the worst hand on the turn, but still be a favorite to win. There you definitely want to bet, too.

2. Having the best hand.

The nut flush draw in a HU situation is often the best hand, and we typically have an equity edge against our opponent's range (but perhaps not against the range that calls our bet). Still, we'd often rather fold him now and take his equity rather than giving him a free card.

3. Making ourselves overly vulnerable to value bets.

By checking behind, we induce bluffs, yes, but we also induce value bets, bets that we're planning on paying off with our lowly A high. A villain who's bluffing 100% is also value betting 100% typically, and that eats into our profits signficantly. If we're against a better player who'll bluff at us on the river with the game-theory-correct frequency while still value betting his made hands, we're in even more trouble. Against an opponent who'll never bluff c/r, but will always bluff bet if we check, we should bet to stop his river bluffs. If he still donks the river, we can usually lay our hand down safely. On the other hand, if we have a villain who'll bluff c/r the turn 100%, we should STILL bet, because we have the best hand often enough to pump our equity [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. It's those damn buggers who are in between that cause problems.

Anyone interested can see more on these topics in the post I linked.

This is not to knock jrz's post, though. I'd say betting the turn is something I do too much, and it's a good reminder to tone it back a bit. But betting the turn too little is a mistake, too [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

Absolution 01-09-2007 03:22 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Against an opponent who'll never bluff c/r, but will always bluff bet if we check, we should bet to stop his river bluffs.

[/ QUOTE ]

And this also stops him from getting to showdown some percentage of the time for the same price. If he calls our turn bet and bets into us we are beat and can fold. If he checks and we check behind, we sometimes lose to a pair caught on the river.

[ QUOTE ]
It's those damn buggers who are in between that cause problems.

[/ QUOTE ]

It doesn't sound like there are many opponents where inducing a river bluff is the correct play. Maybe it's a guy who bluffs the incorrect amount on the river, but not 100%.

One of the components of semi-bluffing is the ability to bluff a scare card on the next round, but I'm not sure that applies that much on the river.

MrWookie 01-09-2007 03:28 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
Against an opponent who'll c/r frequently (25%+, I think, bluffs and for value) AND bluff the river frequently, I think we should check.

Also, against an opponent who'll bluff the river frequently even if we bet the turn.

Absolution 01-09-2007 03:36 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
Against an opponent who'll c/r frequently (25%+, I think, bluffs and for value) AND bluff the river frequently, I think we should check.

[/ QUOTE ]

That sounds a lot like the guy you mentioned that will bluff the river some percentage of the time and value bet 100% of the time. Also, what is the game-theory correct amount to river bluff? Is is the amount that makes you think I'm enough of a LAG that you'll give me free river cards and pay off my value bets every time?

Befolder 01-09-2007 03:37 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
Great post Jrz. I read it all and most of the replies up to this point.

Helped me confirm that much of my cbet growth is correct.

tyler_cracker 01-09-2007 03:45 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
what is the game-theory correct amount to river bluff? Is is the amount that makes you think I'm enough of a LAG that you'll give me free river cards and pay off my value bets every time?

[/ QUOTE ]

Wookie is referring to a couple of chapters in _Theory of Poker_. You should really read it, but a short illustration:

You are HU on the river with a hand that can only beat a bluff (like A-high). Your opponent bets. The pot lays 4:1. You should call if your opponent is bluffing more than 1/5 times; otherwise, you should fold. If your opponent bluffs exactly 1/5 times, then you can never make the optimal play on the river -- no mater what you do, you lose according to the Fundamental Theorem of Poker.

The real situation is somewhat more complicated, but i think i got the basics correct.

Absolution 01-09-2007 03:46 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
what is the game-theory correct amount to river bluff? Is is the amount that makes you think I'm enough of a LAG that you'll give me free river cards and pay off my value bets every time?

[/ QUOTE ]

Wookie is referring to a couple of chapters in _Theory of Poker_. You should really read it, but a short illustration:

You are HU on the river with a hand that can only beat a bluff (like A-high). Your opponent bets. The pot lays 4:1. You should call if your opponent is bluffing more than 1/5 times; otherwise, you should fold. If your opponent bluffs exactly 1/5 times, then you can never make the optimal play on the river -- no mater what you do, you lose according to the Fundamental Theorem of Poker.

The real situation is somewhat more complicated, but i think i got the basics correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have read TOP. I'm asking in this particular case. I'm just trying to generate discussion. In your case you don't lose anything, you break even. If you have an opponent who thinks you are a LAG and will check raise him on the turn often, he might try to induce a bet from you on the river. If you know what he is up to, your correct bluffing frequency is 0. The problem is, he should catch on to this so you have to bluff just enough to keep him doing this.

OziBattler 11-28-2007 02:04 AM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
bump to keep this alive for the micro wiki and because it is a good thread for saving when the forum moves.

Sarge85 11-28-2007 02:31 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
Definitely worth a read and a re-read. Well thought out and put together.

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Sarge85 11-28-2007 02:58 PM

Re: Firing the Second Barrel (long)
 
[ QUOTE ]

- be more inclined to fire the second barrel when the board is dry.
- if you pick up a redraw on the turn, be less inclided to fire the second barrel, even on a drawey board because you have to call a c/r



[/ QUOTE ]

I think your blending a couple concepts together and you may have got your car turned the wrong way.

Assuming you yourself don't have a draw to a flush/straight - you should be betting the turn on the drawey board, and then checking behind UI on the river.

On a dry board we assume they may have something, since well their obviously not drawing to a str8 or flush. Again this is going to be somewhat player dependent and board texture dependent.

Now in the case where you have the draw to the flush as well as overs, you would/could be more inclined to check or check-behind because you don't want to be two bets to hit your draw on the times your opponent does have a hand. Again I'll add the caveat that this is somewhat board/player dependent.

Tyler had a thread (that got hijacked) that could have been labeled "Checking with Outs" that starts to hit on that subject.

Sarge[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.