i am tone deaf : (
 

61%

i am sure you can beat me - is OOT tone deaf?

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

way too long.. 80.6 percent, no musical training, i'm alright with that.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

there is nothing new under the sun.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

88%. holla.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

I don't know about tone-deafness, but this test proved that I have ADD.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...rue#Post8050425

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

my bad, sorry i didn't realize these rhythm/tone deafness links were already posted last month, my bad, carry on!
: )

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

[ QUOTE ]
way too long.. 80.6 percent, no musical training, i'm alright with that.

[/ QUOTE ]

Umm thats exactly what I got and I thought it took too long. Get out of my head!

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

hmm, i thought i was gonna get like a 55% but i got an 83%. sweet.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

91.7%

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

vocal coaches will tell you, virtually noone is tone deaf, they just aren't trained.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

88.9% which surprised me because I can't sing worth a [censored] so I always thought I was tone deaf.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

51% and they basically implied that I am borderline retarded... [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
but I have always known that I am horribly tone deaf. Cats and babies cry when I sing....

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

77.8%

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

78%. meh.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

88.9%

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

78% no musical training. I actually thought I did pretty well, but I suppose not.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

88.9

I think its not just telling tones, its also musical memory.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

it's completely musical memory.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

47.2%.....It is very sad that guessing would do on better than my trying

rJ_

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

75% right in the meaty part of the curve

not showing off,not falling behind

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

I'm surprisingly not tone deaf, I got 77.8%. I did miserably in the rhythm test though, 52.8%, and I'm a terrible dancer.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

EZ

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

[ QUOTE ]
I'm surprisingly not tone deaf, I got 77.8%. I did miserably in the rhythm test though, 52.8%, and I'm a terrible dancer.

[/ QUOTE ]

Try the pitch test. That one was pretty fun. I thought I did well, as I can tell the difference between less than one Hertz @ 500 Hertz.

Then I found out it was only 59th percentile [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

I think the more interesting thing about these tests is our perception of our performance. I have always been very competitive and would bet that most others posting on a poker website would be also. I have always performed very well on standardized tests and my perception was that I performed well on these test also; until seeing the results. 69% on the tone deaf (lowest 25% percentile) and 7.5 Hz on the pitch test and I was thinking wow that has to be good until I saw that it was in the lowest 10%.

I guess the upside here is: I really don't need to waste my money on that $1000 stereo equipment

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

[ QUOTE ]
7.5 Hz on the pitch test and I was thinking wow that has to be good until I saw that it was in the lowest 10%.


[/ QUOTE ]

Retake the Hertz test. The first time I took it, it shut off abruptly and said I was bottom 3. lol. I re-took it and got 59th %ile.

Note: Retaking it is not cheating on this particular test. But you will get really sick of hearing the beeps after taking it twice lollers

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

That test is supposed to stop abruptly. You keep going until you get X amount wrong.

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

[ QUOTE ]
way too long.. 80.6 percent, no musical training, i'm alright with that.

[/ QUOTE ]

same here but i also was doing work at the time,

Re: i am tone deaf : (
 

[ QUOTE ]
That test is supposed to stop abruptly. You keep going until you get X amount wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well somehow I went from 3rd percentile to 59th. I suggest re-taking it if you get way down low. There seems to be some sort of error.

But you are right, the test stopped abruptly the second time as well.