Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Internet Gambling (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=30)
-   -   POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=296700)

MrBellVaDeer 01-02-2007 05:00 PM

POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
PokerStars has over triple the amount of players that Full Tilt has but does that mean it is easier to win at??? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

I am think of switching to FULLTILE for better rakeback but, don't know if it is harder to win at [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] PLEASE HELP ME

hra146 01-02-2007 05:21 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
what stakes you play?

I used to spent too much time figuring out at what sites the games are most soft. If you play < NL100 it doesnt matter anyway. Good table selection will do the job.

thedarknight 01-02-2007 05:24 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
haha mcvickers!

SoCalRugger 01-02-2007 06:50 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
what stakes you play?

I used to spent too much time figuring out at what sites the games are most soft. If you play < NL100 it doesnt matter anyway. Good table selection will do the job.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is probably the first time somone has actually given McVicker a serious answer.

pokerpunchout 01-02-2007 07:08 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
PS = FT ... if you want soft hit Bodog or Prima

TobDog 01-02-2007 10:39 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
I hear FullTile is great this time of year, new bonus, I think next Thursday.

housenuts 01-02-2007 10:58 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
fulltile is futile

grando 01-03-2007 12:46 AM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
just have 12 accounts at each

Yakuman 01-03-2007 02:12 AM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
Full Tilt is a rock garden. Avoid.

catalyst 01-03-2007 02:18 AM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
PS = FT ... if you want soft hit Bodog or Prima

[/ QUOTE ]

is bodog compatible with pt and pahud?

pikachu 01-03-2007 02:20 AM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
PS = FT ... if you want soft hit Bodog or Prima

[/ QUOTE ]

is bodog compatible with pt and pahud?

[/ QUOTE ]
No...that's why it's soft

themandude 01-03-2007 03:29 AM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
dam don't say FT is a rock garden that's depressing to me

ignorance is blisssssssssssssss

Perk76 01-03-2007 12:45 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
What defines a rock garden?

Personally I think its quite easy to find good tables at FT, especially since you can datamine before you sit down. Yesterday I was sitting at 4 NL100 tables averaging 45%/5%.... Is that a rock garden?

I generally play later evenings and early nights eastern time...

TobDog 01-03-2007 02:15 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
What defines a rock garden?

[/ QUOTE ]

1. playing a 6max game with 4 other known 2+2 posters that have green names
2. Seeing VPIP and PFR in red and same number on entire table.

MuckinWinners 01-03-2007 05:46 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
green names

[/ QUOTE ] ???

GrandmaStabone 01-03-2007 06:52 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
haha WackoJacko!

[/ QUOTE ]

chicagoY 01-04-2007 03:33 AM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
That's pretty good man. Nice scouting.

TheCutter 01-04-2007 07:50 AM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
green names

[/ QUOTE ] ???

[/ QUOTE ]
He uses the free alternative of PAH, GameTime++, which shows profitable names in green, I think.

6471849653 01-04-2007 07:54 AM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
If one wants tight and tough games there's WPEX, no rake, no point playing at full tilt (it's also a rather fitting name to what happens there). PokerStars may be rigged according to this: http://poker-sucks.com/poker-sucks/p...bbing-you.html though not reliable.

amberdosh 01-04-2007 08:05 AM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
just have 12 accounts at each

[/ QUOTE ]
just 12 each nh

o0mr_bill0o 01-04-2007 02:06 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
If one wants tight and tough games there's WPEX, no rake, no point playing at full tilt (it's also a rather fitting name to what happens there). PokerStars may be rigged according to this: http://poker-sucks.com/poker-sucks/p...bbing-you.html though not reliable.

[/ QUOTE ]

is there a thread anywhere that discusses this?

Chino Brown 01-04-2007 02:47 PM

Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If one wants tight and tough games there's WPEX, no rake, no point playing at full tilt (it's also a rather fitting name to what happens there). PokerStars may be rigged according to this: http://poker-sucks.com/poker-sucks/p...bbing-you.html though not reliable.

[/ QUOTE ]

is there a thread anywhere that discusses this?

[/ QUOTE ]

LOLOLOLOLOL!!! [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] The sarcasm is cracking me up!! I can't take it!!


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.