So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

Full HH of the 200 rebuy from today (despite gobbo writing 100r on the label thingy). Since we have been discussing LAG play so often here these days, and it's all the rage for tourneys, I thought this was a perfect HH to submit right now. Some of my plays probably seem borderline wreckless, or totally insane, but I was not drunk or on any other drugs while playing this tournament.

LAGGY ANSKY

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

So would you consider your play good or bad on the whole in this tournament? Some of the stuff was pretty zany (your 6c3c hand comes to mind as one, reraising a MP raiser with a5o, etc.), but overall so far in the hands I've seen (at around 40), you haven't been faring that badly and it actually looks a little bit like how I play. (which is inspiring for my game, letting me know things such as: check/folding frequently is not an embarassing humiliation of my poker abilities, edit:despite my being a lag preflop.)

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

ok, im going to tackle this, I probably wont get done tonight though.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
So would you consider your play good or bad on the whole in this tournament?

[/ QUOTE ]


very good

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

this was a really fun replay to watch, but I gotta say the hand that most impressed me was hand 161

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
this was a really fun replay to watch, but I gotta say the hand that most impressed me was hand 161

[/ QUOTE ]

where he open folds T9o in MP?

typo? or am i not getting something by skipping right to that?

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

yeah, watch the whole thing and you should understand why I said that

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

I'll get around to it, but for whatever reason PXF sucks for me. It never responds when I click stuff, whether I'm using Firefox or IE.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

What were the deciding factors that made you play so LAG in this tournament was it the table/bigstack?

At the beginning you played really LAG and there isnt much to talk about because you never really got called or flopped anything. Throughout the history Im not going to bore you with "Hand XX: Standard" I will just cut to the chase

Hand 53: the bb has been at your table for a while and knows you are playing LAG, I can see him calling with any 2 preflop and expecting him to be leading with complete air alot. This is a very risky play can we got your thoughts on this hand ?

Hand 87: the small reraise leaves him with about 11k obviously enough room to fold but it seems like he has a monster or its a complete resteal here. with your image I dont think you are getting many folds out of him here, you had been raising a lot and he picks a time with complete air to bluff against you? This is obviously a horrible play by him or maybe a great read by you can you give us your thoughts here?

Hand 93: The majority of your raises have come from MP/MP any reason why you mixed it up here with Q5s utg (next orbit K8o utg you fold)? nice flop sucks you didnt get action but checking the flop here would be bad.

Hand 104: I actually stopped the hand and analyzed it before i saw the results here. when he calls off 20% of his stack preflop against a lag i really dont like putting anything else in the pot, with a marginal hand he is going to shove over you preflop and by check raising you even get TT or something to get all im which may have folded to a lead. I'm guessing you read his flop bet as extremely weak but i dont see him calling/betting over 1/2 he stack against a lag here with nothing.

Hand 107: Looks like you ran into an overpair, but with your lag style and after the J9 hand I dont like check raisign this flop because it looks like you completely full of [censored], and i can see a decent player shoving AQ/AK back at you and not giving up pocketpairs.

Hand 124: I dont like raising here on the button with 92o due to your previous encounters but if you do I bet the flop.

Hand ~150: I see a bunch of green around this point and i think, "nice pwnage of a bubble" then i realize you are just a cardrack.
Hand 150: This player is somewhat new to you table but I like this resteal spot, you have 20bbs and there is ~10k in the pot.

Hand 153: ErickW23 and Tsoprano are in the blinds here, how much do the players in the blinds affect your LAG raises?

Hnad 157: You have JKs and flop TP what do you put erik on and whats your play if called or raised on the flop?

Hand 168: I think this call is a bit loose getting less than 2-1

Hand 190: this call also seems a bit loose with below to act behind.

Hand 198: I agree that Below is a prefect player to do this against but giving a "gambler" 2-1(?) doenst seem very good in this spot.


overall you played very good, normal TAG play would have blinded you out here a lot with such [censored] cards early/mid. Its a shame you never got action with you big hands even though you had kept up a lag image I think that was one of your downfalls. Nothing you can really do unless you want to fold TT 5 handed.

edit: i forgot to add that this tournament you showed good judgment tightening way up when you wernt the 1st raiser and also tightening way up when you stack started to dwindle/blinds increase.

OGRE

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

here I go

15 I hate the overlimp with QJo raise or fold
19 hate that call with k2s UTG raise and UTG+1 call no reason to call
21 hate calling the reraise image is not worth it
23 really like a turn bet there pair +FD unless your plan was to c/rai but you were too deep for that
28 wtf open limping in CO?
71 I like a resteal there with A10o you are ahead of his range.
109 I shove there almost 6k in the pot thats 33% of yuor stack BS could be opening lighter there.
120 nh I hate it would just shove PF but that's me
124 continuation bet if you are going to open raise any2 on button that was a dry board bet. turn I like a raise of 2.5 to 3 times his bet free showdown and also can get better hands to fold.
138... 92o 2 orbits prior than you fold A5o...
168 I think A10o is way ahead of his button shoving range there
181 is more proof why I think the 168 fold is bad esp considering his stack and pos
190 k2o meh let the BB call
198 you 3bet bluff a lot

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

Thanks. Thru half of it.

91 bothered me a little. Just saving time?

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

Appreciate the link here, as a lower level learning player this made me think about a few high-blind situations differently.

One thing that would bring this to life a little is to understand where the bubble bursts and how many are left - say at the blind level changes... is this info available on PFX (could not see it) would you have it?

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

Thanks for posting this.
I'm going to post some of the hands and ask some very elementary questions.

Hand 23: you open raise 3x from EP for the second hand in a row, this time with 63c and then c-bet the two flush K910 flop. Button calls. Button has 8458 behind and you have 16645. Turn brings a 6 and you check.

Two questions. Why no second barrel with pair and flush draw? Secondly, I fold 63s from EP after raising previous hand because I feel I'm more likely to get action. Do you find this and is getting action with marginal hands OOP part of the function of having a large stack?

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 87: the small reraise leaves him with about 11k obviously enough room to fold but it seems like he has a monster or its a complete resteal here. with your image I dont think you are getting many folds out of him here, you had been raising a lot and he picks a time with complete air to bluff against you? This is obviously a horrible play by him or maybe a great read by you can you give us your thoughts here?

OGRE

[/ QUOTE ]

When I grow up, I want to be an astronaut, like Ansky. I think the key here is the silly raise amount and history between the two. Villain has been substantially owned twice in BB from button and is obviously sick of hero. Added to which, his stack is reaching the point where he's not going to have any room for anything other than an AI resteal. If he's going to make a stand, it's got to be now and he's already had his fingers burned seeing a flop OOP v hero. Also, villain has been seen to put reasonably substantial chips in the pot and then fold before seeing the flop. So I guess that Ansky sees this as a good spot to make a move. BB may have woken up with a hand but the table is pretty weak, IMO, and Ansky has a substantial chip lead that is not unduly compromised by getting his chips in with the worst hand and losing. Up to this point, no one has worked out how to respond to Ansky's laggy play, except by reraising with better hands and watching him fold, which isn't the best way to deal with a maniac who has a big stack. It doesn't appear to me that anyone is playing back at him without the goods, despite knowing that he's opening and calling light, so it's not going to hurt him unduly to lose here and show down his cards.

FWIW, I hate those typed-in silly figure raises and they tend to make me play sub-optimally.

FWIW, having been outplayed post-flop and pre-flop by hero, villain has to stick it all in here if he wants to make a stand with whatever hand that he's folding here.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]

Hand 104: I actually stopped the hand and analyzed it before i saw the results here. when he calls off 20% of his stack preflop against a lag i really dont like putting anything else in the pot, with a marginal hand he is going to shove over you preflop and by check raising you even get TT or something to get all im which may have folded to a lead. I'm guessing you read his flop bet as extremely weak but i dont see him calling/betting over 1/2 he stack against a lag here with nothing.

OGRE

[/ QUOTE ]

Villain has flatcalled previously for a large portion of his stack from SB and then check, check-folded. The stacks are awkward but I don't think that hero can fold to any bet here when he has flopped second pair and the pot is that large in relation to villain's stack. If he leads, villain probably only calls/raises if he's ahead so check-calling is the play.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

Ansky, you don't cbet a lot of the time, even on flops that would seem favorable for a cbet to me.

Why?

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

It seemed to me that you only played laggy when you should of, rather than played the entire tournament laggy.

The player in two to your left early (bcans) was way too weak tight(which is more obvious b/c we see your cards btw, maybe it wasn't as obvious to him). You took advantage of both his lack of blind defense and apparent lack of knowledge/courage to re-steal from you. He consistently folded his blinds and when he defended, he only called your raise and left you in position.

More than anything here, I think it was the situation (other players) that made LAG effective here. I think you recognized this too as you turned it off a bit at different tables and of course when players got very shortstacked and were going A/I.

Nice job sir. Thanks for the post.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
What were the deciding factors that made you play so LAG in this tournament was it the table/bigstack?

At the beginning you played really LAG and there isnt much to talk about because you never really got called or flopped anything. Throughout the history Im not going to bore you with "Hand XX: Standard" I will just cut to the chase

Hand 53: the bb has been at your table for a while and knows you are playing LAG, I can see him calling with any 2 preflop and expecting him to be leading with complete air alot. This is a very risky play can we got your thoughts on this hand ?

Hand 87: the small reraise leaves him with about 11k obviously enough room to fold but it seems like he has a monster or its a complete resteal here. with your image I dont think you are getting many folds out of him here, you had been raising a lot and he picks a time with complete air to bluff against you? This is obviously a horrible play by him or maybe a great read by you can you give us your thoughts here?

Hand 93: The majority of your raises have come from MP/MP any reason why you mixed it up here with Q5s utg (next orbit K8o utg you fold)? nice flop sucks you didnt get action but checking the flop here would be bad.

Hand 104: I actually stopped the hand and analyzed it before i saw the results here. when he calls off 20% of his stack preflop against a lag i really dont like putting anything else in the pot, with a marginal hand he is going to shove over you preflop and by check raising you even get TT or something to get all im which may have folded to a lead. I'm guessing you read his flop bet as extremely weak but i dont see him calling/betting over 1/2 he stack against a lag here with nothing.

Hand 107: Looks like you ran into an overpair, but with your lag style and after the J9 hand I dont like check raisign this flop because it looks like you completely full of [censored], and i can see a decent player shoving AQ/AK back at you and not giving up pocketpairs.

Hand 124: I dont like raising here on the button with 92o due to your previous encounters but if you do I bet the flop.

Hand ~150: I see a bunch of green around this point and i think, "nice pwnage of a bubble" then i realize you are just a cardrack.
Hand 150: This player is somewhat new to you table but I like this resteal spot, you have 20bbs and there is ~10k in the pot.

Hand 153: ErickW23 and Tsoprano are in the blinds here, how much do the players in the blinds affect your LAG raises?

Hnad 157: You have JKs and flop TP what do you put erik on and whats your play if called or raised on the flop?

Hand 168: I think this call is a bit loose getting less than 2-1

Hand 190: this call also seems a bit loose with below to act behind.

Hand 198: I agree that Below is a prefect player to do this against but giving a "gambler" 2-1(?) doenst seem very good in this spot.


overall you played very good, normal TAG play would have blinded you out here a lot with such [censored] cards early/mid. Its a shame you never got action with you big hands even though you had kept up a lag image I think that was one of your downfalls. Nothing you can really do unless you want to fold TT 5 handed.

edit: i forgot to add that this tournament you showed good judgment tightening way up when you wernt the 1st raiser and also tightening way up when you stack started to dwindle/blinds increase.

OGRE

[/ QUOTE ]
word

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Villain has flatcalled previously for a large portion of his stack from SB and then check, check-folded.

[/ QUOTE ]

This changes things a bit but there are still so few hands he has beat here. AQ/AJ/88/77

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

Hand 87: Good lord.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

Well done. There are only two hands that I "definitely" play differently here. In 29 and 87, the worst possible hands IMO for restealing with are Ace and King small. If you are called you are likely a huge underdog. I would rather do this with 98o than A5 or K3.

As to people questioning about why he doesn't cbet more often, it's called varying your play. If you cbet every time, any good player is going to have you for breakfast. I think your frequency of cbetting, bluff-raising, etc. is about perfect here.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Well done. There are only two hands that I "definitely" play differently here. In 29 and 87, the worst possible hands IMO for restealing with are Ace and King small. If you are called you are likely a huge underdog. I would rather do this with 98o than A5 or K3.

As to people questioning about why he doesn't cbet more often, it's called varying your play. If you cbet every time, any good player is going to have you for breakfast. I think your frequency of cbetting, bluff-raising, etc. is about perfect here.

[/ QUOTE ]


I specifically recall Ansky stating in multiple posts that when restealing your cards matter a lot less than what you think your opponent has and how he plays. If Ansky thought restealing there with A5o was profitable, then I'm sure he would have done it with a hand a lot weaker like J4o.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

I really enjoyed that. never used that xfactor before and it's great too.

Can you comment on #150 where u have K5s in the BB and 3-bet all-in vs the button?

and # 198.

pure reads here?

p.s. - anybody subscribe to that for their training videos? reviews? seems pricey for my play level.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

i haven't gotten to watch the whole thing, but i had to see some of the hands people were talking about
i LOVE hand 87. it take some heart to pull off a 4-bet like that but you can in the right spots
more later

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

I already forgot the hand # but I'm curious as to the open min raise in MP w/ J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] w/ 200-400 blinds (I think). You do this w/ AK here too? Misclick?

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

I was just driving all day and I'm kind of busy but I want to address all the questions later.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 53: the bb has been at your table for a while and knows you are playing LAG, I can see him calling with any 2 preflop and expecting him to be leading with complete air alot. This is a very risky play can we got your thoughts on this hand ?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you said it yourself, a lot of time he is just leading with crap on a board like that, and the way I was betting made it pretty clear that I wanted to play for stacks so if he had a marginal hand it would be pretty hard for him to continue unless he puts me on total air. Also I had been at the table a decent amount so I felt I had a good feel for the player and what his bets meant. In this case I just didn't think he would ever be clever enough to be leading with the intention of 3 betting, or leading with trips there.


[ QUOTE ]

Hand 87: the small reraise leaves him with about 11k obviously enough room to fold but it seems like he has a monster or its a complete resteal here. with your image I dont think you are getting many folds out of him here, you had been raising a lot and he picks a time with complete air to bluff against you? This is obviously a horrible play by him or maybe a great read by you can you give us your thoughts here?

[/ QUOTE ]
This hand I just really felt with the timing and the fact that I had been going so insane that he was really repopping me light there. Also maybe it's just hindsight bias or whatever but I remember thinking with his timing it sort of felt like he just decided to reraise me there, not like he actually had a hand.

Uhmmm my friend just called and I gotta go out and get hammered since I just got back to school, I'll do this [censored] in the next few days.

btw to all the ppl who are like OMG K2S WATF, 85 SUITED CMON.

chill. I am calling super loose in alot of spots for very good reasons, not because I think in a vacuum those spots are +EV. I have very good notes on a lot of stars regulars, I was 1 tabling so I really had a feel for the unknowns, and I was trying to take advantage of position as much as possible.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Ansky, you don't cbet a lot of the time, even on flops that would seem favorable for a cbet to me.

Why?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll make a quick answer because booze awaits me.

I think in higher buy ins c-betting is not so simple as it usually is in lower buy ins with bigger donks. Very often in high buy ins you will get check raised with air, or semi bluffed, or all sorts of [censored] that you don't want happening. Also, players aren't dumb, and they know that very often you will check behind a hand with showdown value or occasionally a monster, so I don't expect an auto bet on the turn if I check behind on a flop. If you always cbet you will most certainly get punished. Also a lot had to do with the flow of the table and my horrid image.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
here I go

15 I hate the overlimp with QJo raise or fold
19 hate that call with k2s UTG raise and UTG+1 call no reason to call
21 hate calling the reraise image is not worth it
23 really like a turn bet there pair +FD unless your plan was to c/rai but you were too deep for that
28 wtf open limping in CO?
71 I like a resteal there with A10o you are ahead of his range.
109 I shove there almost 6k in the pot thats 33% of yuor stack BS could be opening lighter there.
120 nh I hate it would just shove PF but that's me
124 continuation bet if you are going to open raise any2 on button that was a dry board bet. turn I like a raise of 2.5 to 3 times his bet free showdown and also can get better hands to fold.
138... 92o 2 orbits prior than you fold A5o...
168 I think A10o is way ahead of his button shoving range there
181 is more proof why I think the 168 fold is bad esp considering his stack and pos
190 k2o meh let the BB call
198 you 3bet bluff a lot


[/ QUOTE ]

It really seems like you looked at each hand individually, and not as how they related to eachother. IE fact that I open fold A5o but raise 92o in the same spot 1 round before is [censored] meaningless. I wouldn't be raising A5o for value, it's a position raise and steal that can't stand any more heat.

I'll go into your individual remarks later.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

driving? or being driven?

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

HAHA. This tourney is great. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Glad it worked out for you, but lots of these plays seem rather reckless.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
driving? or being driven?

[/ QUOTE ]

Semantics.

btw die.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
HAHA. This tourney is great. [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

Glad it worked out for you, but lots of these plays seem rather reckless.

[/ QUOTE ]

IT DIDNT WORK OUT I CAME 10TH

IM SO DRUNK.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

didnt read other responses, if the hands were talked about... well, my bad.

hand 23: Kinda borderline raise pf, you raised 5 of the previous 6 hands, but eh, still probably fine. I bet more on the flop though, and were you going to c/r the turn? cause i think i bet again. so like 1100 flop, 3000 turn.

hand 28: that's pretty meh. Stacks arent that deep. but since you called, why not call again on the flop? a minbet and a call, getting 4:1 w/ a pair, and if it checks to you on the turn you probably can take the pot. or look for a 7 or Q and represent JT.. i dunno, but you wanted to play the hand, dont see why you didnt continue.

hand 34: that's pretty thin too, but whatever.

hand 108: meh, this is the 2nd time you called his pf raise real weak from the Bb. A9o here sucks. 97o here sucked too, but i think i like that more than this.


hand 157: i c/r, you'd been so active, i guess a lead is gonna get played back at too, but i like a c/r better i think.

hadn 168: who you think you are? Gigabet? I'm folding, it MIGHT be +cev, but could easily be bad. I didnt watch the hands you didnt play, so if this guy was pushing like 75% of his hands, alright i'm with you, but if he's just been blinding out and then pushes his stack in, i dont think this is a good spot for us.

196: you just did the call-steal, i go back to the raise-steal now, especially since you have a pretty good hand.



GG

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 93: The majority of your raises have come from MP/MP any reason why you mixed it up here with Q5s utg (next orbit K8o utg you fold)? nice flop sucks you didnt get action but checking the flop here would be bad.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think you mean 91. Dunno, the table was a bunch of nits so I felt comfortable raising up front with a junk hand. I think also that a case can be made for checking behind on the flop although I think betting is just fine as well.

btw I think with the stack sizes at the table raising Q5s is just fine there utg. No one is so short that ill have to commit myself more, no super aggro players with big stacks, almost everyone was a nit.

[ QUOTE ]

Hand 104: I actually stopped the hand and analyzed it before i saw the results here. when he calls off 20% of his stack preflop against a lag i really dont like putting anything else in the pot, with a marginal hand he is going to shove over you preflop and by check raising you even get TT or something to get all im which may have folded to a lead. I'm guessing you read his flop bet as extremely weak but i dont see him calling/betting over 1/2 he stack against a lag here with nothing.

[/ QUOTE ]

U just might be right, but also consider that if he can have TT, he can also have 88 and 77 and 66 etc. Also, I didn't rule out AQ or something. In general when I'm playing with unknowns I don't give them credit for slowplaying (in a good spot) aces often enough. If they do it, good for them they are exploiting me, but I just don't see it happening often enough for me to have put AA in his range. Also,I figured he shoves AK pf so I really was worried mostly about either a slowplayed AA (but not really), or the worst hand would be like KQ or TT. Either way I don't think most pairs fold if I lead the flop with my image. The way I played it I figure at least I get a bet out of a bluff or a lower pair if I'm gonna stick my stack in anyway (maybe bet/fold is better?) If I bet though with the intention of folding to a push it basically turns my hand into 72o (which may not be so bad in this spot since there are no draws and it's unlikely hes shoving air).

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 107: Looks like you ran into an overpair, but with your lag style and after the J9 hand I dont like check raisign this flop because it looks like you completely full of [censored], and i can see a decent player shoving AQ/AK back at you and not giving up pocketpairs.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are completely right, I think I just got carried away.\

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 124: I dont like raising here on the button with 92o due to your previous encounters but if you do I bet the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

I didn't bet the flop because of sort of recent history with that player and I really felt like I was getting c/r'd on that board and therefore I thought a check behind would save me money. On the turn I paired up so I thought I could possibly win in a showdown.

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 153: ErickW23 and Tsoprano are in the blinds here, how much do the players in the blinds affect your LAG raises?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, that's why I didn't raise, and the players in the blinds have a HUGE effect on whether i steal or not.

[ QUOTE ]
Hnad 157: You have JKs and flop TP what do you put erik on and whats your play if called or raised on the flop?

[/ QUOTE ]

I thought there was a decent chance with my history with the player and my general image at the player that if I lead he would tend to be over aggressive and try to move me off my hand with air. I wasn't really looking to fold at all.

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 168: I think this call is a bit loose getting less than 2-1

[/ QUOTE ]

waaaaaaaaaaat the dudes range is prob top 80% and I have a suited 1 gapper and a PRETTY one as well. I haven't pokerstoved it but im getting like 1.9-1 im sure it's +EV.

[ QUOTE ]

Hand 190: this call also seems a bit loose with below to act behind.


[/ QUOTE ]

meh his range is at least 90% if not 100% so im sure in isolation it's +cEV, although with below in there i dont kno.

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 198: I agree that Below is a prefect player to do this against but giving a "gambler" 2-1(?) doenst seem very good in this spot.


[/ QUOTE ]

not sure what you mean by that but I play below quite a bit so I'd rather not go into specifics in a public forum.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
15 I hate the overlimp with QJo raise or fold

[/ QUOTE ]
meh this is so random and fine with these stacks i dont know where u are coming from. this is really style imo.

[ QUOTE ]
19 hate that call with k2s UTG raise and UTG+1 call no reason to call

[/ QUOTE ]
In my mind their frequency of check/folding when they miss was high enough, and their frequency of going apeshit with a decent hand when I have a better hand was high enough as well to make this pf decision +EV. I realize there is only so much one can say from an outside perspective so I agree in general this pf action is bad in a vacuum but I think it was perfectly fine in this spot.

[ QUOTE ]
21 hate calling the reraise image is not worth it

[/ QUOTE ]

I totally disagree and it's a pretty huge reason i think I am very difficult to play against, and I want ppl to kno they can't just make tiny bitch raises to try to take my chips.

[ QUOTE ]
23 really like a turn bet there pair +FD unless your plan was to c/rai but you were too deep for that

[/ QUOTE ]

meh, my "pair" is pretty meaningless if I got all in because if I get all in there the 5 extra outs from having a pair on that board are likely negated (cause he would have 2 pair or better a huge % of the time).

[ QUOTE ]
28 wtf open limping in CO?

[/ QUOTE ]

um read again it wasnt an open limp it was an overlimp after a utg limp, and with his stack i didnt want to raise because it would have made things awkward post flop. Also the button in that hand is arbiannight who is very tight and I was pretty sure i'd have position.

[ QUOTE ]
71 I like a resteal there with A10o you are ahead of his range

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe but the fact that I am ahead of his range isn't really the reason to resteal if you think he'll never call with a worse hand (which he wont i dont think?). I think this player was def tight and it wasnt worth it to test his range here.

[ QUOTE ]
109 I shove there almost 6k in the pot thats 33% of yuor stack BS could be opening lighter there.

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe, i think its kind of close with my stack there, although don't forget he WAS utg.

[ QUOTE ]
124 continuation bet if you are going to open raise any2 on button that was a dry board bet. turn I like a raise of 2.5 to 3 times his bet free showdown and also can get better hands to fold.

[/ QUOTE ]
I explained already why i didnt cbet, but with regards to your turn idea, the stacks are just not at all deep enough for that, so i dont really know what u are talking about.


[ QUOTE ]
138... 92o 2 orbits prior than you fold A5o...

[/ QUOTE ]

ummmm yeah i thought it was +EV with 92o in that exact spot in that exact round etc, but not with A5o a couple rounds later, what do my cards have to do with anything here?

[ QUOTE ]
168 I think A10o is way ahead of his button shoving range there

[/ QUOTE ]
maybe but he was shoving 14 bbs so I'm not so sure. (at the time at least)

[ QUOTE ]
181 is more proof why I think the 168 fold is bad esp considering his stack and pos

[/ QUOTE ]
Sorry i didnt have my time machine handy so i didnt kno he was that overaggro on a shortstack.

[ QUOTE ]
198 you 3bet bluff a lot

[/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

I'd like to also say on quite a few of these hands like the 74o limp and the call of the raise w/ K2s that there is a decent chance that they are pure spews, and I am very open to that possibility.

Re: So you guys want to see a LAG in action? (Full HH)
 

[ QUOTE ]
hadn 168: who you think you are? Gigabet? I'm folding, it MIGHT be +cev, but could easily be bad. I didnt watch the hands you didnt play, so if this guy was pushing like 75% of his hands, alright i'm with you, but if he's just been blinding out and then pushes his stack in, i dont think this is a good spot for us.


[/ QUOTE ]

yeah maybe,but i felt his range was just about any 2.

[ QUOTE ]
196: you just did the call-steal, i go back to the raise-steal now, especially since you have a pretty good hand.


[/ QUOTE ]

Are you prepared to call BA's shove if he does shove? (which he does a lot there imo)