Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Micro Stakes Limit (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=37)
-   -   KQ off (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=187435)

sean c 08-15-2006 12:24 PM

KQ off
 
Party .50/1.00 FR. Villian unknown.

Pre flop: One early limper, i raise KQ off from a middle position, villian 3-bets from a late position, everyone including the early limper folds and i call.

Flop(2 players 8.5sb): AQx rainbow.

Whats the plan post flop?

plonker 08-15-2006 12:25 PM

Re: KQ off
 
I would C/R the flop. And take it from there. If he 3 bets me, and nothing comes on the turn to help me then i'm letting it go

sean c 08-15-2006 12:26 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
I would C/R the flop. And take it from there. If he 3 bets me, and nothing comes on the turn to help me then i'm letting it go

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you trying to accomplish with a flop check/raise?

DrModern 08-15-2006 12:27 PM

Re: KQ off
 
Check-call, reevaluate on turn.

virompl 08-15-2006 12:29 PM

Re: KQ off
 
I check call all the way down against a unknown.

sean c 08-15-2006 12:29 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
Check-call, reevaluate on turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the turn is a brick?

plonker 08-15-2006 12:32 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would C/R the flop. And take it from there. If he 3 bets me, and nothing comes on the turn to help me then i'm letting it go

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you trying to accomplish with a flop check/raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hang me out to dry with this one , but I ain't donk betting the flop. I really don't want to call down. So its either a rasie or folding. And I think folding is pretty weak, on the basis that your giving him credit for the A or pocket K/Q's.

Thats my explantion now tell me why i'm wrong [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] (which i'm sure you will)

DrModern 08-15-2006 12:33 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Check-call, reevaluate on turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the turn is a brick?

[/ QUOTE ]

Tough one. It sort of depends on what kind of brick it is (e.g. if it opens or closes any draws). I think it's pretty marginal between check-call (with value for the read) and check-fold.

MrWookie 08-15-2006 12:38 PM

Re: KQ off
 
I could see a c/c flop, c/f turn line, but you guys who're regularly playing in this game could perhaps better tell me how often villains will bet twice with JJ here.

Dr. Matt 08-15-2006 12:40 PM

Re: KQ off
 
I think my plan is to call down to aggression. C/r the flop is worthless for info on an unknown. I think because we got a piece of it, we have equity to call down. There's no real equity to raise it at any point.

sean c 08-15-2006 12:42 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would C/R the flop. And take it from there. If he 3 bets me, and nothing comes on the turn to help me then i'm letting it go

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you trying to accomplish with a flop check/raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hang me out to dry with this one , but I ain't donk betting the flop. I really don't want to call down. So its either a rasie or folding. And I think folding is pretty weak, on the basis that your giving him credit for the A or pocket K/Q's.

Thats my explantion now tell me why i'm wrong [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] (which i'm sure you will)

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the main thing if ahead here we really don't want our villian to fold. Also depending on what range you put an unknown on here we are probably in pretty bad shape.

Edit to add i would not donk this flop.

plonker 08-15-2006 12:43 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
C/r the flop is worthless for info on an unknown.

[/ QUOTE ]

raising for info is nearly always 99% wrong IMO.

virompl 08-15-2006 12:47 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
I would C/R the flop. And take it from there. If he 3 bets me, and nothing comes on the turn to help me then i'm letting it go

[/ QUOTE ]

The bad thing about this line is your probably just getting called down by KK.

plonker 08-15-2006 12:52 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would C/R the flop. And take it from there. If he 3 bets me, and nothing comes on the turn to help me then i'm letting it go

[/ QUOTE ]

What are you trying to accomplish with a flop check/raise?

[/ QUOTE ]

Hang me out to dry with this one , but I ain't donk betting the flop. I really don't want to call down. So its either a rasie or folding. And I think folding is pretty weak, on the basis that your giving him credit for the A or pocket K/Q's.

Thats my explantion now tell me why i'm wrong [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] (which i'm sure you will)

[/ QUOTE ]

I think the main thing if ahead here we really don't want our villian to fold. Also depending on what range you put an unknown on here we are probably in pretty bad shape.

Edit to add i would not donk this flop.

[/ QUOTE ]

Can understand where you are coming from now. I'll keep and eye on this thread [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

MrWookie 08-15-2006 12:53 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
I think my plan is to call down to aggression. C/r the flop is worthless for info on an unknown. I think because we got a piece of it, we have equity to call down. There's no real equity to raise it at any point.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, so on the flop, you put him on a range of hands, and there are a good number we beat of them, making folding bad. However, of that set, how many bet the turn? How many continue to bet the river?

sean c 08-15-2006 12:53 PM

Re: KQ off
 
DrModern, MrWookie the turn was a complete low brick. I checked he bet and this was where i was lost. If i call i assume the river is a standard bet/fold UI?

Befolder 08-15-2006 12:56 PM

Re: KQ off
 
I'm probably more likely to go c/c, c/f UI, even though I don't like it. Without a read though, I'll take the safe route until I get one.

I've seen myself call too many bets w/ a 2nd best in the past. I don't think it's turned me weak, but I think we're behind more hands the average player will 3 bet: AQ, AK, AQs, AKs, KQs, AA, KK, QQ, JJ, TT.

There's not much profit there in calling down. I probably have too narrow a range for villain's three bet. I certainly 3-bet more stuff.

Sushiglutton 08-15-2006 01:11 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think my plan is to call down to aggression. C/r the flop is worthless for info on an unknown. I think because we got a piece of it, we have equity to call down. There's no real equity to raise it at any point.

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, so on the flop, you put him on a range of hands, and there are a good number we beat of them, making folding bad. However, of that set, how many bet the turn? How many continue to bet the river?

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't u think all hands in his flop range bet the turn to be able to show down on the river? We can have KJ or something for all he knows. But I don't think a hand worse than top pair will bet this river. So maybe c/c flop and turn and fold river UI?

Buzz-cp 08-15-2006 01:26 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Check-call, reevaluate on turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

If the turn is a brick?

[/ QUOTE ]

c/f

oop suxor

Jaran 08-15-2006 02:14 PM

Re: KQ off
 
How about a radically crazy line...bet/call flop, bet/fold turn.

-Jaran

Sushiglutton 08-15-2006 02:17 PM

Re: KQ off
 
Can you please give the correct answer soon [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]?

Buzz-cp 08-15-2006 02:42 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
How about a radically crazy line...bet/call flop, bet/fold turn.

-Jaran

[/ QUOTE ]

yah, but I haven't had success with that lately.

Buzz

SL__72 08-15-2006 02:57 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
How about a radically crazy line...bet/call flop, bet/fold turn.

-Jaran

[/ QUOTE ]

You donk the turn UI when he raises you on the flop? at .5/1?

What do you do on the river when he calls your turn bet?

CrMenace 08-15-2006 03:29 PM

Re: KQ off
 
*grunch*

Plan is to call down UI. There aren't many hands that the typical player 3-bets- JJ+, AK. You're behind most of these.

Shillx 08-15-2006 03:36 PM

Re: KQ off
 
Check/call. Check/fold if he bets again

GrandmaStabone 08-15-2006 04:39 PM

Re: KQ off
 
You say he is unknown, so lets say that he is generally a TAG, a LP or a LAG.

A TAG's 3-betting range is AK, AQ (maybe), TT, JJ QQ, KK, and AA. The only hands you beat here are TT and JJ. SO he is ahead with a LOT more hands than he is behind.

A LP's 3-betting range is even more narrow so we are behind even more.

The only way you are likely to have the best hand here is if villain is a LAG, and even then it is shaky because he raises with a lot more aces.

Basically this means you are beind almost every hand vs almost every opponent except MAYBE a LAG. I think you have the odds to peel one on the flop, but even if you improve i wouldn't get too aggressive because the same hands that improve you improve his range. Definite fold on the turn UI.

3-beting ranges are pretty narrow, and if you are aginst a villain who 3-bets crap you will have a read within the first orbit so you will know next time.

C/R is ridiculous, and IMO calling down is a mistake too in this spot.

Jaran 08-15-2006 05:20 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How about a radically crazy line...bet/call flop, bet/fold turn.

-Jaran

[/ QUOTE ]

You donk the turn UI when he raises you on the flop? at .5/1?

What do you do on the river when he calls your turn bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

I most likely wouldn't use this line without an overaggro pf/flop read. But, just to get the thoughts flowing, how many times have we seen a hand on this board where someone raises JJ after a couple of limpers, gets bet into on an Ahigh or Khigh flop, and about half of the responses suggest a riase? (yeah, I know this is a different scenario) Personally, against an unknown, I think the best line is c/c, c/f. (Although this begs the question on the correct line on the river if villian cks behind on the turn).

As to your question on what to do on the river if villian just calls the turn donk (sng!!!), I would plan on a bet/fold again.

-Jaran

freedom18 08-15-2006 05:40 PM

Re: KQ off
 
villan is 3 betting : TT JJ QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs
QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs continue to bet till river (KK will check behind on river)

leaving us ahead of 2 hands behind 7
c/c c/f

Befolder 08-15-2006 05:42 PM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
villan is 3 betting : TT JJ QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs
QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs continue to bet till river (KK will check behind on river)

leaving us ahead of 2 hands behind 7
c/c c/f

[/ QUOTE ]
Way to put some evidence behind it.

freedom18 08-15-2006 06:00 PM

Re: KQ off
 
well im saying as a standard majority of the time [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]a

Befolder 08-16-2006 10:30 AM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
well im saying as a standard majority of the time [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]a

[/ QUOTE ]
I wasn't being sarcastic. Good job quanifying it.
[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

Ampelmann 08-16-2006 10:35 AM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
Check-call, reevaluate on turn.

[/ QUOTE ]
On what turn cards would you put more money in?

MrWookie 08-16-2006 10:40 AM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
villan is 3 betting : TT JJ QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs
QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs continue to bet till river (KK will check behind on river)

leaving us ahead of 2 hands behind 7
c/c c/f

[/ QUOTE ]

In order to really get this right, you need to tell us how many ways he can have each of those hands. For instance, there are a lot more JJ's than QQ's, so you can't count them each as just one "hand."

Ampelmann 08-16-2006 10:46 AM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
villan is 3 betting : TT JJ QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs
QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs continue to bet till river (KK will check behind on river)

leaving us ahead of 2 hands behind 7
c/c c/f

[/ QUOTE ]
You should count the hands with their respective multiplicity.

Behind: AA (3), AKo+s (12), AQo+s (6), KK (6), QQ (1)
Ahead: TT (6), JJ (6).

So we're ahead against 12 hands and behind against 28. That's 7:3 as opposed to 7:2. (I hope I didn't mess things up)

Assuming villain bets every street if we check we get 13.5:5 (27:10) for a call down. That's not good enough, so c/c flop c/f turn sounds good.

shadeball 08-16-2006 10:47 AM

Re: KQ off
 
if a K drops on the turn i still think we can only beat the same hands we could on the flop... but now they have a more outs to draw out on us....

If a Q drops on the turn the the hand is ours unless he has AA

DrModern 08-16-2006 10:49 AM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Check-call, reevaluate on turn.

[/ QUOTE ]
On what turn cards would you put more money in?

[/ QUOTE ]

Basically: A queen.

MrWookie 08-16-2006 10:53 AM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
villan is 3 betting : TT JJ QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs
QQ KK AA AQ AQs AK AKs continue to bet till river (KK will check behind on river)

leaving us ahead of 2 hands behind 7
c/c c/f

[/ QUOTE ]
You should count the hands with their respective multiplicity.

Behind: AA (3), AKo+s (12), AQo+s (6), KK (6), QQ (1)
Ahead: TT (6), JJ (6).

So we're ahead against 12 hands and behind against 28. That's 7:3 as opposed to 7:2. (I hope I didn't mess things up)

Assuming villain bets every street if we check we get 13.5:5 (27:10) for a call down. That's not good enough, so c/c flop c/f turn sounds good.

[/ QUOTE ]

You don't win the prize, either. There are only 9 AK's and 3 KK's. You forgot that we held a K.

MrWookie 08-16-2006 10:54 AM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
If a Q drops on the turn the the hand is ours unless he has AA

[/ QUOTE ]

Or AQ

shadeball 08-16-2006 10:55 AM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If a Q drops on the turn the the hand is ours unless he has AA

[/ QUOTE ]

Or AQ

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah that too =P sorry i just woke up

Ampelmann 08-16-2006 10:57 AM

Re: KQ off
 
[ QUOTE ]
You don't win the prize, either. There are only 9 AK's and 3 KK's. You forgot that we held a K.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ouch. Go back to counting 101.

So we're behind only 22 combinations. Still, calling down seems wrong given the odds.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.