Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Small Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=41)
-   -   Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=166799)

Grunch 07-20-2006 08:11 PM

Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
This is a bread & butter as it gets...

New table.

Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $0.10/$0.25
5 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $24.40
CO: $35.19
Button: $56.80
Grunch: $26.65
BB: $20.86

Pre-flop: (5 players) Grunch is SB with 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]
UTG calls, CO calls, Button calls, Grunch calls, BB checks.

Flop: ($1.25) K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (5 players)
<font color="#cc0000">Grunch bets $1.2</font>, BB folds, UTG calls, CO calls, Button folds.

Turn: ($4.85) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (3 players)
Grunch ... ?

bilbo-san 07-20-2006 08:15 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
Bets $3.

All this is really intended to do is to set a price that we are willing to call, which is also high enough to ensure that we do not look weak, and won't be bluff-raised.

quarkncover 07-20-2006 08:16 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
Bets $3.

All this is really intended to do is to set a price that we are willing to call, which is also high enough to ensure that we do not look weak, and won't be bluff-raised.

[/ QUOTE ]

Block that Turn!

livenowson 07-20-2006 08:17 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
I would continue betting here as you probably have gained more outs.

Dan Bitel 07-20-2006 08:17 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
I don't lead this flop

but as played, I like bilbo's idea of betting 3

Grunch 07-20-2006 08:20 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't lead this flop

[/ QUOTE ]

What is your plan?

los_toros 07-20-2006 08:23 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't lead this flop

[/ QUOTE ]

What is your plan?

[/ QUOTE ]
Play a small pot and see what the action brings. I rarely lead non nut FDs OOP at this level.

Gobgogbog 07-20-2006 08:26 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
The only options I see on the flop are lead or c/f, both of which are fine. edit: Actually, I really really prefer c/f here, that's a lot of opponents.

As played, I lead the turn for $3.5.

aces_dad 07-20-2006 08:27 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
I'd rather lead HU than 5way, we dont take it down often enough on teh flop.

tufat23 07-20-2006 08:29 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
i lead $3.5 here

Dan Bitel 07-20-2006 08:37 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
grunch,

5way, we just don't have enough FE IMO, especially OOP and acting 1st.

I normally c/c if i get odds which i normally do

bilbo-san 07-20-2006 08:37 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't lead this flop

[/ QUOTE ]

What is your plan?

[/ QUOTE ]
Play a small pot and see what the action brings. I rarely lead non nut FDs OOP at this level.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would rather lead non-nut FDs than nut FDs.

Dan Bitel 07-20-2006 08:39 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't lead this flop

[/ QUOTE ]

What is your plan?

[/ QUOTE ]
Play a small pot and see what the action brings. I rarely lead non nut FDs OOP at this level.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would rather lead non-nut FDs than nut FDs.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd lead neither OOP in a limped pot.

But if I was to lead any of them, it would be the NFD due to extra outs

Gobgogbog 07-20-2006 08:39 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
grunch,

5way, we just don't have enough FE IMO, especially OOP and acting 1st.

I normally c/c if i get odds which i normally do

[/ QUOTE ]

You have to get some pretty sick odds. Your draw is obvious and very difficult to extract with OOP, yet when a bigger flush hits it's very hard to find out at all quickly.

bilbo-san 07-20-2006 08:41 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
grunch,

5way, we just don't have enough FE IMO, especially OOP and acting 1st.

I normally c/c if i get odds which i normally do

[/ QUOTE ]

The pot is tiny.

All this lead really is for is to set up stacking an opponent on a [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] turn. For example, it would be awesome to hit the A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] vs. an opponent that holds A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. Or any spade vs. the A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].

Etc...

By leading, we disguise our hand, and we have great implied odds for hitting the flush on the turn. If we c/c here, our hand is very transparent.

Jake (The Snake) 07-20-2006 08:46 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
Another reason (besides # of opponents) that I can think of why betting out on the flop is bad is because of the K and Q on board... makes it more likely that we will be raised.

I also like a 3$ or so blocking bet on the turn.

bilbo-san 07-20-2006 08:49 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
Another reason (besides # of opponents) that I can think of why betting out on the flop is bad is because of the K and Q on board... makes it more likely that we will be raised.

I also like a 3$ or so blocking bet on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

I rarely see a lot of raising in limped pots at this level. And a set is very unlikely on this board due to pre-flop action.

bilbo-san 07-20-2006 08:50 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't lead this flop

[/ QUOTE ]

What is your plan?

[/ QUOTE ]
Play a small pot and see what the action brings. I rarely lead non nut FDs OOP at this level.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would rather lead non-nut FDs than nut FDs.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'd lead neither OOP in a limped pot.

But if I was to lead any of them, it would be the NFD due to extra outs

[/ QUOTE ]

Let me elaborate: with the NFD, I am more likely to c/r than to lead.

The non-nut draw has a lot less value, and I'm a lot less disappointed if I get raised so much that I cannot continue.

younghov17 07-20-2006 08:54 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
check flop, only call a bet if u have at least 3.5 to 1. your draw is pretty weak, your position sucks so if u hit your hand ur going to have to show strength to extract which makes it obvious, therefor ur implied odds suck.

mmbt0ne 07-20-2006 08:54 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't lead this flop

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, with a K and Q on this flop, it hits a lot of limpers' ranges, so I think total fold equity is pretty slim.

Dan Bitel 07-20-2006 10:13 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
bilbo,

leading doesn't disuise our hand nearly as much as you think it does. All it does is cuts down on our implied odds. And we certainly don't stack come1 on a spade turn unless he has a set

orange 07-20-2006 10:16 PM

Re: Basic Hand: Marginal FD OOP
 
Flop is whatever.

Turn I lead. Makes river very easy to play.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.