Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   Medium Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=58)
-   -   Is Limping always wrong? (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=151254)

derk 06-30-2006 03:24 PM

Is Limping always wrong?
 
let me clear up my question. lets say you are in the CO or Button position, and you look down at a bad hand...like......7-3o or Q-7o or 2-4s...bad hands, but if u have a read on ur opponent or you know that you aren't going to be reraised(I mean to an extent because you can't always be right) is it an "acceptable' move to limp here and hope to hit? I'd like to hear ur opinion on this when u have an average stack compared to a large stack. thank you

Big_Jim 06-30-2006 03:26 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
You're asking if open limping, on the button, with trash, is wrong?

Yes, yes it is.

If you can do anything to show me that this move is anything but -EV, that would be cool.

DJ Sensei 06-30-2006 03:26 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
dont limp that trash

illmatic 06-30-2006 03:30 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
a scenario I imagine in which this would be correct, is stacks of 100000BB, 9 players limping, no chance of a rr, and players will stack off routinely with top pair.

in that or a similar case, it is +EV to go for the 1:50 shot at flopping two pair or trips with trash.

otherwise, it is a sin against nature and you must fold

(in some live games which closely approximate the above, I think limping with trash can be +ev, but this is rare and really I think you should forget I said that)

later
illmatic

Big_Jim 06-30-2006 03:38 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
[ QUOTE ]
a scenario I imagine in which this would be correct, is stacks of 100000BB, 9 players limping, no chance of a rr, and players will stack off routinely with top pair.

[/ QUOTE ]
Where the hell is this game? Commerce?

Go_Blue88 06-30-2006 04:26 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
I pretty much don't limp ever. Occasionally 22 UTG, but normally I raise that.

thedustbustr 06-30-2006 04:55 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
BBuddy said in a hsnl thread that he's seen lolo open limp button several times

JKratzer 06-30-2006 05:14 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
[ QUOTE ]
BBuddy said in a hsnl thread that he's seen lolo open limp button several times

[/ QUOTE ]

which only goes to prove even good players make mistakes. several times.

soah 06-30-2006 05:33 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
[ QUOTE ]
BBuddy said in a hsnl thread that he's seen lolo open limp button several times

[/ QUOTE ]

with 73o??

thedustbustr 06-30-2006 05:37 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BBuddy said in a hsnl thread that he's seen lolo open limp button several times

[/ QUOTE ]

which only goes to prove even good players make mistakes. several times.

[/ QUOTE ]
this is very arrogant

Baracus 06-30-2006 05:49 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
I have a hard time seeing the benefit with openlimping on the button but sure there are some times when it's propriate to limp, like when there are a three fullstack limpers, you have the button and BB has got 12bb and you look down at 56s.

DJ Sensei 06-30-2006 06:06 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
BBuddy said in a hsnl thread that he's seen lolo open limp button several times

[/ QUOTE ]

which only goes to prove even good players make mistakes. several times.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are certainly strategic situations where openlimping the button is a decent play, but I think these benefits are completely related to metagame and involve very good players who have thousands of hands together. When that is the case, chances are something like openlimping the button will confuse them as to your holdings enough that it can be good, particularly given the relative size of stacks behind at this point.

In the MSNL context, these conditions will rarely apply. And hands like those mentioned in the OP will not be the ones i'm talking about.

FreakDaddy 06-30-2006 06:54 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
[ QUOTE ]
let me clear up my question. lets say you are in the CO or Button position, and you look down at a bad hand...like......7-3o or Q-7o or 2-4s...bad hands, but if u have a read on ur opponent or you know that you aren't going to be reraised(I mean to an extent because you can't always be right) is it an "acceptable' move to limp here and hope to hit? I'd like to hear ur opinion on this when u have an average stack compared to a large stack. thank you

[/ QUOTE ]

Your question still isn't clear. Are you open limping? Limpers in front of you?

Rick305 06-30-2006 07:33 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
[ QUOTE ]

in that or a similar case, it is +EV to go for the 1:50 shot at flopping two pair or trips with trash.


[/ QUOTE ]

What are the real odds of flopping at least two pair?

illmatic 06-30-2006 08:08 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
49 to 1 to flop 2pr
73 to 1 to flop trips (not a set)

later,
illmatic

IRV 06-30-2006 08:23 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
There is nothing wrong with limping on CO or the Button if you have a good reason to do so.

IRV

Big_Jim 06-30-2006 09:15 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
[ QUOTE ]
There is nothing wrong with limping on CO or the Button if you have a good reason to do so.

IRV

[/ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
with 73o??

[/ QUOTE ]

Equal 06-30-2006 10:30 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
[ QUOTE ]
49 to 1 to flop 2pr
73 to 1 to flop trips (not a set)

later,
illmatic

[/ QUOTE ]

What are the odds to hit a set?

smartalecc5 06-30-2006 11:42 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
1 : 7 or 8ish

Chris Daddy Cool 06-30-2006 11:46 PM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
i open limp all the time.

spacetime 07-01-2006 01:20 AM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
who doesnt.

SinkRox 07-01-2006 02:03 AM

Re: Is Limping always wrong?
 
OP, 'when you have an average stack' doesnt really apply - you should always be topping up.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.