Two Plus Two Newer Archives

Two Plus Two Newer Archives (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/index.php)
-   High Stakes (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/forumdisplay.php?f=21)
-   -   Win Rate Threads are Stupid (http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showthread.php?t=104702)

9cao 05-04-2006 05:39 PM

Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
I would like to know what a good win rate is at various limits. Obviously we all know we can improve but it is difficult to know by how much. Usually you can't ask these questions without it degenerating immediately. Therefore, here is a poll and we can fill it anonymously and not compare penis sizes.

I would suggest a minimum of 50k hands for any level you choose to answer and if you have over 100k hands maybe just the hands from the last 6 months. Let's do it in PT BB's. Thanks to anyone willing.

9cao 05-04-2006 05:55 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
I started saying a minimum of 20k hands because I thought the more data the better but I have changed to 50k for quality over quantity.

wtfsvi 05-04-2006 06:31 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
You should edit quickly to include a show the results option.

edit: uhm, guess it's too late

9cao 05-04-2006 06:35 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
[ QUOTE ]
You should edit quickly to include a show the results option.

edit: uhm, guess it's too late

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't see the poll since I voted but I thought you could see results without voting? If not, I guess that is why >12.5 is so popular. Sorry about that.

EmpireMaker2 05-04-2006 08:29 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
No one has higher then 10 at any of these........

8 is probably the best you can keep......

I know 1 5-10 player with 8.2, and one 10-20 player with over 8.

T-God 05-04-2006 08:51 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
[ QUOTE ]
I know 1 5-10 player with 8.2

[/ QUOTE ]
Is it you? I totally have that beat over my 10k hand sample size.

cardsharkk04 05-05-2006 12:25 AM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
Wheres the negative numbers?

Durer 05-05-2006 12:30 AM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
the over 12.5 guys who are not lying, how many tables do you play?

wtfsvi 05-05-2006 12:32 AM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
[ QUOTE ]
the over 12.5 guys who are not lying, how many tables do you play?

[/ QUOTE ] I picked over 12.5 on 10/20 and higher than 10/20 to see the results. Since everyone knows that noone wins at that rate at that level.

burningyen 05-05-2006 01:11 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
[ QUOTE ]
I picked over 12.5 on 10/20 and higher than 10/20 to see the results. Since everyone knows that noone wins at that rate at that level.

[/ QUOTE ]

edge 05-05-2006 05:39 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
There's also a view results button you can use. As the name implies, it allows you to view the results.

wtfsvi 05-05-2006 05:44 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
Where?

edge 05-05-2006 05:45 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
Right below the submit button.

wtfsvi 05-05-2006 05:54 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
Oh my. There it is.

Daliman 05-05-2006 10:54 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
what's the difference between PTBB/100 and Pokeroffice PT/100?

I know that PO is Big Bets/100, and therefore 2x big blind, andI've heard that PT is Big Blinds/100, but also something about Bit bets (???)/100, which are essentially 4 big blinds(???). Anyone???

T-God 05-05-2006 11:16 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
I don't know what the [censored] a bit bet is and I think you made it up. But in nl big bets are the same size as the big blind so if pokeroffice lists the winrate as 2xbigBlind then it's the same as ptbb (pokertracker). Did that make sense? I don't use PO so I'm assuming you're right about it being 2x the big blind. Pokertracker is definitely 2x the bb.

Daliman 05-05-2006 11:27 PM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know what the [censored] a bit bet is and I think you made it up. But in nl big bets are the same size as the big blind so if pokeroffice lists the winrate as 2xbigBlind then it's the same as ptbb (pokertracker). Did that make sense? I don't use PO so I'm assuming you're right about it being 2x the big blind. Pokertracker is definitely 2x the bb.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ok, that works ty for the info.

P.S. I SWEAR I didn't make up "bit bets"; a frequent poster here told me it. I will either NOT out him if he sends me $5 on stars or WILL out him if someone else sens me $10. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

edge 05-06-2006 12:54 AM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
"Bit bets" is a typo. Notice how the "t" and "g" on your keyboard are close together.

Daliman 05-06-2006 01:05 AM

Re: Win Rate Threads are Stupid
 
[ QUOTE ]
"Bit bets" is a typo. Notice how the "t" and "g" on your keyboard are close together.

[/ QUOTE ]



I don't think so, but the way the chat came out, mebbe;
"PTBB = bit bets = 2x bb....bit = big


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.