Terms & Conditions

Internet Magazine

Non–US new players
Get five 2+2 books


Order Books
Book Translations
Forum Login
 
 
Expand All   Collapse All

 Two Plus Two 
2+2 Magazine Forum
Special Sklansky Forum
2+2 Pokercast
About the Forums

 General Poker Discussion 
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Poker Legislation

 Coaching/Training 
StoxPoker
DeucesCracked

 German Forums 
Poker Allgemein
Strategie: Holdem NL cash
Strategie: Sonstige
Internet/Online
BBV
Small Talk
German Poker News

 French Forums 
Forum francophone
Strategie
BBV (French)

 Limit Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes Limit
Medium Stakes Limit
Small Stakes Limit
Micro Stakes Limit
Mid-High Short-handed
Small Stakes Shorthanded
Limit––>NL

 PL/NL Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes
Medium Stakes
Small Stakes
Micro Stakes
Small-High Full Ring
Micro Full Ring

 Tournament Poker 
Small Stakes MTT
High Stakes MTT
MTT Community
STT Strategy
Tournament Circuit

 Other Poker 
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Heads Up Poker
Other Poker Games

 General Gambling 
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Entertainment Betting

 Internet Gambling 
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Affiliates/RakeBack
Software

 2+2 Communities 
Other Other Topics
The Lounge: Discussion+Review
El Diablo's General Discussion
BBV4Life

 Other Topics 
Golf
Sporting Events
Politics
Business, Finance, and Investing
Travel
Science, Math, and Philosophy
Health and Fitness
Student Life
Puzzles and Other Games
Video Games
Laughs or Links!
Computer Technical Help
Sponsored Support Forums
RakebackNetwork
RakeReduction.com
Other Links
Books
Authors
Abbreviations
Calendar
Order Books
Books by Others
Favorite Links
Feedback
Advertising Information
Home
Posting Hints
Privacy Notice
Forum Archives

The 2+2 Forums

Before using this Forum, please refer to the Terms and Conditions (Last modified: 2/26/2006)

Be sure to read the   Two Plus Two Internet Magazine

This is an archive. The main forums are here

These forums are read only.


 
UBB.threads™ Groupee, Inc.

General Poker Discussion >> Poker Legislation

Lawman007
veteran


Reged: 01/15/06
Posts: 1329
Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary
      09/30/06 05:50 PM

Quote:

Quote:

It has nothing to do with Neteller "complying" with the US Government. If if the US bans the banks from dealing with Neteller then Neteller has no reason to bother dealing with US citizens. There would be too much confusion for it to be made worthwhile. Also, I'm sure that they aren't exactly looking to become an enemy with the US Government, which they certainly would become if they started helping Americans illegaly. Not to mention the entire ordeal of dealing with Americans and foreign bank accounts and what not is a huge hassle and probably not worthwhile for them.




the whole point is that there is no reason to believe the bolded section will take place.




Wrong again.

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Hock_ 09/30/06 11:15 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Hellheart   10/25/06 01:30 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary John Roberts   10/01/06 02:39 AM
. * * VERY simple solution ricdaman   10/01/06 02:09 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution AlexM   10/01/06 03:38 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution Jack Bando   10/01/06 09:24 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution Phil123   10/01/06 02:18 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution yad   10/01/06 03:15 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution Phil123   10/01/06 11:19 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution BigAlK   10/01/06 05:26 PM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution DavidNB   10/01/06 09:10 PM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution cognito20   10/02/06 12:16 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution argybargy2002   10/02/06 01:20 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution linuxrocks   10/02/06 08:36 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution argybargy2002   10/04/06 12:18 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution TruckeeSlick   10/02/06 08:01 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution Reef   10/02/06 08:18 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution Wynton   10/02/06 08:27 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution nation   10/01/06 11:52 PM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution FoxwoodsFiend   10/02/06 12:01 AM
. * * Re: VERY simple solution Lawman007   10/02/06 12:15 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary mosta   10/01/06 01:28 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary MLSchaff   10/01/06 01:53 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Phil123   10/01/06 02:11 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary dibbs   10/01/06 02:21 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary MLSchaff   10/01/06 02:31 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary mpslg   10/01/06 11:24 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Lawman007   10/01/06 08:24 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Jack Bando   10/01/06 01:09 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary lzfsb3   10/01/06 02:12 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary kevstreet   10/01/06 11:41 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Phil123   10/01/06 01:39 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Leavenfish   09/30/06 03:19 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary uncleshady   09/30/06 03:27 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary nomadtla   09/30/06 03:24 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary mikeh1975   09/30/06 03:22 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Josh.   09/30/06 12:26 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary BillJames   09/30/06 11:40 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary chicagoY   09/30/06 12:12 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Hock_   09/30/06 12:15 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Hock_   09/30/06 11:45 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary MicroBob   09/30/06 11:53 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary sublime   09/30/06 08:27 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary boomshakalaka   09/30/06 09:15 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary MannyIsGod   09/30/06 11:57 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary NFuego20   09/30/06 11:37 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary BillJames   09/30/06 11:57 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Fishy McDonk   09/30/06 12:47 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Quercus   09/30/06 01:26 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Fishy McDonk   09/30/06 01:40 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary MannyIsGod   09/30/06 11:59 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary MicroBob   09/30/06 01:23 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary aislephive   09/30/06 12:16 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary mlagoo   09/30/06 01:50 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Lawman007   09/30/06 05:50 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary mlagoo   09/30/06 06:34 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary BillJames   09/30/06 02:29 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary oreopimp   09/30/06 06:39 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary oreopimp   09/30/06 06:46 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Lawman007   09/30/06 06:49 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Lawman007   09/30/06 06:42 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary nhtool   09/30/06 02:57 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Fishy McDonk   09/30/06 02:36 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary BillJames   09/30/06 02:47 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary rakemeplz   09/30/06 02:52 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary mmbt0ne   09/30/06 07:52 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Leader   09/30/06 07:59 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Lawman007   09/30/06 08:08 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary mmcd   09/30/06 09:05 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Leader   09/30/06 09:24 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Lawman007   09/30/06 09:10 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary E.Z.   09/30/06 08:16 PM
. * * Interesting Silent1   09/30/06 08:02 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary AAAA   09/30/06 05:40 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary HSB   09/30/06 02:41 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary mlagoo   09/30/06 02:40 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary HSB   09/30/06 01:58 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary StellarWind   09/30/06 10:31 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary StevieG   09/30/06 07:06 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary oreopimp   09/30/06 07:19 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary CharlieDontSurf   09/30/06 07:41 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary HSB   09/30/06 07:15 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary BillJames   09/30/06 02:34 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary MannyIsGod   09/30/06 12:26 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary fsuplayer   09/30/06 11:18 AM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Stashua   09/30/06 10:33 PM
. * * Re: 270 Days Pretty Solid -- no run on the banks necessary Phil123   10/01/06 01:16 AM

Extra information
0 registered and 9 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Berge20, Performify, 4_2_it, Mike Haven 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 18149

Rate this thread

Jump to

contact us 2+2 Publishing

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Message Boards and Forums Directory

Pages provided by ConJelCo