Terms & Conditions

Internet Magazine

Non–US new players
Get five 2+2 books


Order Books
Book Translations
Forum Login
 
 
Expand All   Collapse All

 Two Plus Two 
2+2 Magazine Forum
Special Sklansky Forum
2+2 Pokercast
About the Forums

 General Poker Discussion 
Beginners Questions
Books and Publications
Televised Poker
News, Views, and Gossip
Brick and Mortar
Home Poker
Beats, Brags, and Variance
Poker Theory
Poker Legislation

 Coaching/Training 
StoxPoker
DeucesCracked

 German Forums 
Poker Allgemein
Strategie: Holdem NL cash
Strategie: Sonstige
Internet/Online
BBV
Small Talk
German Poker News

 French Forums 
Forum francophone
Strategie
BBV (French)

 Limit Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes Limit
Medium Stakes Limit
Small Stakes Limit
Micro Stakes Limit
Mid-High Short-handed
Small Stakes Shorthanded
Limit––>NL

 PL/NL Texas Hold'em 
High Stakes
Medium Stakes
Small Stakes
Micro Stakes
Small-High Full Ring
Micro Full Ring

 Tournament Poker 
Small Stakes MTT
High Stakes MTT
MTT Community
STT Strategy
Tournament Circuit

 Other Poker 
Omaha/8
Omaha High
Stud
Heads Up Poker
Other Poker Games

 General Gambling 
Probability
Psychology
Sports Betting
Other Gambling Games
Entertainment Betting

 Internet Gambling 
Internet Gambling
Internet Bonuses
Affiliates/RakeBack
Software

 2+2 Communities 
Other Other Topics
The Lounge: Discussion+Review
El Diablo's General Discussion
BBV4Life

 Other Topics 
Golf
Sporting Events
Politics
Business, Finance, and Investing
Travel
Science, Math, and Philosophy
Health and Fitness
Student Life
Puzzles and Other Games
Video Games
Laughs or Links!
Computer Technical Help
Sponsored Support Forums
RakebackNetwork
RakeReduction.com
Other Links
Books
Authors
Abbreviations
Calendar
Order Books
Books by Others
Favorite Links
Feedback
Advertising Information
Home
Posting Hints
Privacy Notice
Forum Archives

The 2+2 Forums

Before using this Forum, please refer to the Terms and Conditions (Last modified: 2/26/2006)

Be sure to read the   Two Plus Two Internet Magazine

This is an archive. The main forums are here

These forums are read only.


 
UBB.threads™ Groupee, Inc.

Tournament Poker >> MTT Strategy

curtains
Carpal \'Tunnel


Reged: 05/04/03
Posts: 13960
Loc: Philadelphia
Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes
      10/06/07 10:00 PM

Quote:

Quote:

M is retarded, true BB is much more accurate and easier to grasp, but maybe that's because I grew up playing SnGs in which it's really ridiculous to not think in terms of BBs.

btw is true BB same thing that I do? Basically just take 2/3rds of antes, add them to BB etc etc and thats the new effective BB? I wrote article on this over a year ago.




That's the one curtains. Do you mind explaining a little in detail why you find it preferable to M?




Doesn't it just seem really natural to think in terms of # of BBs? Here's my article listed below although I wouldn't say its extremely advanced:


How to account for antes in NL Tournaments (# of Theoretical Big Blinds)


As many One table tournament players know, you generally think of your stack size in terms of # of Big Blinds. I definitely do this because its exceptionally easy, and makes it very simple to determine whether or not you should raise in a given situation. Also all of the math I have ever done on poker involves # fo BBs. I am going to coin a term called the tBB, which is the theoretical big blind in ante based situations.


Recently the former WSOP Champion, Dan Harrington, coined a term called "M". This term stands for your stack size divided by the BB,SB and the antes. The number you get is supposed to guide you towards making your decisions. While I'm sure it's reasonably effective, I find it incredibly annoying that it doesn't use # of BB's as it's measurement unit.

To combat that I have created what I think is a much more valuable system to those who wish to think in terms of # of BB's. Let's say for example that you have 3000 chips in the SB where the blinds are 100-200. The table is 9 handed. You obviously have 15x the BB, which is generally enough so that you shouldn't just be opening allin from the SB with hands like Q7o.

Now let's talk about how to adjust our calculations once we take antes into account. Let's say that there is a 25 chip ante as well. What I think is the best way to handle this, is to take the sum of the antes, and put 2/3rds of them towards the BB, and the other third towards the SB. So there are 225 ante chips in play because there are (9 players * 25 chips). 2/3rds of 225 = 150. 1/3rd of 225 = 75. So now we add the 150 to the BB and we see that the actual blind structure is 175-350. Suddenly we don't even have 10x the BB! We actually have just 8.5x the BB. I believe that this sudden change in our calculations makes Q7o a clear allin, based on its figure of 9x the BB on the famous Karlsen and Sklansky charts.


Also note that you should generally be SLIGHTLY looser than even these figures suggest, as the blinds will have less money committed than usual. Yes the blinds may theoretically be 175/350, but the BB only has 225 in the pot, thus making him less committed and probably slightly tighter.


Anyway I hope that this article should provide a reasonable alternative to those of you who hate thinking in terms of "M" and would prefer to keep their thinking in terms of # of BB's. Just remember to make this simple calculation at the beginning of each level, so you know what the theoretical blind structure actually is. Below are a few examples for you to figure out on your own:




1. The blinds are 300-600 with a 75 chip ante. The table is 9 handed. You have 4800 chips. How many multiples of the theoretical BB do you have?


2. The blinds are 300-600 with a 50 chip ante. The table is 9 handed and you have 4200 chips. How many multiples of the theoretical BB do you have.


3. The blinds are 1000-2000 and the antes are 100. The table is 6 handed. You have 34000 chips. How many multiples of the theoretical BB do you have?




(4.5) instead of (8).

This should show you how drastic an effect the antes have. You have nearly half as many multiples of the BB that you would if ante's werent involved. You should see how pointless it can be to say something like "I had 8x the BB but there were antes involved". Instead just do this calculation at the beginning of each level.



(4.67) instead of (7).


This is an example of how important the ante amount is. Despite having less chips we actually have more multiples of the BB than in example 1, just because the ante size was 33% less.


(14.167) instead of (17)


This shows that the effects will be lessened somewhat when the table is shorter and the antes are only 1/20th of the BB. However there still is a serious difference between 14 and 17x the BB. If the table was 9 handed we would have just 13x the tBB.









**** - Another method of calculating your tBB is to look at the total pot size before the hand. Most online sites provide this information in clear view on the playing table. You can then take 2/3rds of this figure and have an approximate BB size to use for your calculations. In fact this method may be simpler than the one I have written about above. It's the same concept it just allows you to skip a step, namely the adding of 2/3rds of the ante to the BB.

Post Extras Print Post   Remind Me!     Notify Moderator


Entire topic
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Bond18Moderator 10/05/07 09:52 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes eBo   10/09/07 10:57 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes armen13   10/09/07 01:27 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Qar   10/09/07 02:06 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Bond18Moderator   10/10/07 08:14 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Boise123   10/06/07 04:44 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes JammyDodga   10/05/07 11:49 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes curtains   10/06/07 09:16 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Bond18Moderator   10/06/07 09:21 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes curtains   10/06/07 10:00 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes 21times20   10/07/07 12:50 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes RonFezBuddy   10/08/07 12:36 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes lamma888   10/08/07 08:59 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes sonneti   10/08/07 10:18 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Qar   10/09/07 04:18 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Sherman   10/06/07 09:27 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes BarryLyndon   10/05/07 12:03 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Bond18Moderator   10/05/07 07:39 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes 21times20   10/05/07 11:26 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Bond18Moderator   10/06/07 05:33 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes ChipSpeak   10/06/07 10:58 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes MJBuddy   10/06/07 01:43 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes jonnyd   10/06/07 02:07 PM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes runout_mick   10/05/07 11:40 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes ssnyc   10/05/07 11:00 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Sherman   10/05/07 10:56 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Perplexity   10/05/07 10:50 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes bogey1   10/05/07 10:06 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes cheburashka   10/05/07 10:22 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes Bond18Moderator   10/05/07 10:18 AM
. * * Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 1, Stack Sizes ettorek   10/05/07 09:57 AM

Extra information
0 registered and 4 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Mat Sklansky, Bond18, Jurollo, ZBTHorton, Mike Haven 



Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Thread views: 2036

Rate this thread

Jump to

contact us 2+2 Publishing

Powered by UBB.threads™ 6.5.5


Message Boards and Forums Directory

Pages provided by ConJelCo